Preview

What Is The Difference Between The Underground Man And The Man Of Action

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between The Underground Man And The Man Of Action
In Notes from the Underground by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, the Underground Man’s views on revenge are paralleled to that of the Man of Action. The varying states of consciousness between the Underground Man and the Man of Action contribute to the action or lack of action displayed by the two men. Both the Underground Man and the Man of Action claim to believe in determinism, so that causes a problem for the Underground Man when evaluating the Man of Action’s position on revenge. In the end, the Man of Action will be content with his decision, but the Underground Man will be miserable no matter what decision he makes. In this paper I will discuss the positions of the Man of Action and the Underground Man on acting and then more specifically taking …show more content…
Due to the Underground Man’s strong consciousness he usually ends up in inaction or inertia. He explains this lack of action, “You know the direct, legitimate fruit of consciousness is inertia, that is, conscious siting-with-the-hands-folded…all ‘direct’ persons and men of action are active just because they are stupid and limited” (Dostoyevsky, 11). Thus, the theory of the Underground Man is contrasted to that of the Man of Action, again saying the Man of Action is “stupid” leaving the Underground Man with a superior consciousness, but with an inability to act on it. The Underground Man attributes his inertia with his belief in determinism, or the laws of nature that take free will out of the decision-making process, “It was all in accord with the normal fundamental laws of over-acute consciousness, and with the inertia that was the direct result of those laws, and that consequently one was not only unable to change but could do absolutely nothing” (Dostoyevsky, 5). Consequently, the laws of nature support the Underground Man’s conclusion to remain …show more content…
As a determinist, the Underground Man rejects that free will plays a role in one’s actions. Therefore, taking revenge would leave the Underground Man miserable because he nor the offender controls his own actions, so the punishment would be unjust and the Underground Man would have strayed from his beliefs. On the other hand, the Underground Man cannot avoid misery by not taking revenge either; however, this misery is rooted in the emotional or physical pain caused by the offense. Therefore, no matter the choice, the Underground Man will inevitably be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fyodor Dostoevsky’s novel Notes from the underground has captured audiences for centuries. It's self-contradictory nature and social commentary within has sparked numerous analysis within academia concerning varying parts that these two elements touch. The underground man’s self-loathing combined with a superiority complex creates a narrator and protagonist that confuses the reader. We know not whether to feel pity or loathing for the man who seeks to display his own perceived superiority over others at one moment, and then goes on to attempt to regain this feeling of superiority by verbally attacking a prostitute. Surely this literary figure has such a plethora varying, conflicting elements that have sparked such a variety of academic scholarly…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ha Jin The Saboteur

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Revenge puts off an aroma of evil to the outside world when a person seeks to pay someone back for the wrong committed against them. There seems to be no laws against declaring revenge against a neighbor in our country, but society should know that revenge lends no reconciliation to either party. Also, who truly decides the guilty party when both have committed a wrong towards each other? Mr. Chiu, a character in Ha Jin’s story “The Saboteur,” makes the transition from vacationer and victim of saboteur, to the very essence and definition of saboteur; Jin’s use of role-reversal in this story conveys the concept of revenge clearly and effectively.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking revenge is like stepping onto God’s territory. We take matters into our own hand without thinking that it is HE who should play judge and the avenger of our lives.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by the same author, Fyodor Dostoevsky, the two main characters from “Crime and Punishment” and “Notes from Underground” displays similar qualities. Both characters are corrupted in their ways thinking, which indicates their nihilistic behavior. Although these two characters can be considered nihilists, their behaviors can be classified as ethical, or moral, nihilism. These two characters also relates to one another in terms of inconsistency, individualism and self-justification. Despite of the excerpt from “Notes from Underground”, David Denby’s article, “Can Dostoevsky Still Kick You in the Gut?”, provides a more detailed analysis of the book. Raskolnikov, from “Crime and Punishment”, and the underground man, from “Notes from Underground”,…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the end of Dostoyesky's Crime and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible existence of "extraordinary" men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded ones too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikov's proposed theory on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had "been printed and read a thousand times"(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a German philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends rather than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsche's more selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the "extraordinary" man presented in his…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Background and themes : The central idea of this psychomyth, the scapegoat", writes Le Guin, "turns up in Dostoyevsky's Brothers Karamazov, and…

    • 3149 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Frankenstein by Mary Shelly are two novels which explore the mind and the morality of human nature. One, an epic work of psychic exploration and great depth, the other a tragic story of the cruelness of mankind. In Crime and Punishment, the rehabilitation of man, and the decaying psyche of a criminal are two ideas that are not only evident, but are the roots of many discussions about humanity and the nature of the human mind. In Frankenstein, the cruelness of man and his both denial and impending acceptance of responsibility for his actions are two themes that are seen throughout the novel.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Underground Philosophy The Underground Man lives in a paradoxical state between accepting society, while also resenting it. This mindset has affected his way into integrating himself into civilization. Usually, a person who questions such norms, while also not being sure of his own intentions, is viewed as insane. Conversely, this is not the case, The Underground Man thinks on a philosophical state, which essentially separates him from the society that he is trying to understand.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that they can receive what they desire but not what they need. When they receive desire, they create their own suffering rather than receiving what is actually good for them. He believes that they may not have intentionally punished themselves but they end up getting wound up into their own evil. An example that we both can reflect on is when we indulge in our ice cream while watching The Bachelor. In the moment, we say how good it tastes, but after the show we complain about how it probably wasn’t the best idea to eat the whole carton. This relates to those “in the moment” feelings. In the moment, it sounds like a great idea because we love ice cream, until we start hitting the bottom of the carton with our…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Underground Railroad was a secret network of roads used to lead slaves to the “free” states in the north and Canada. For the abolitionists and the slaves themselves, this was a dangerous and long trek which could last up to two years. Thanks to the outstanding efforts made by the “train masters”, or people who orchestrated the passage of slaves to freedom (particularly Harriet Tubman, a former slave, and Levi Coffin, the reputed president of the Underground Railroad) and the owners of safe houses, many slaves escaped to freedom.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Invisible Man

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Invisible Man, the narrator is in a continuous search for his own identity as he passes from one section of society to another, taking on different roles within each as he questions his place to find his own true self. He is forced to make a choice of whether he will go against society to find himself, or if he will stay obedient to that society, in conforming to the stereotypes that he is given and go with the expectations of him in society. The narrator portrays many qualities of outward conformity while at the same time is inwardly questioning his own actions as he searches for his identity and place within society. However the main character presents these ideas in unique ways through the main character’s awareness of the standards he is conforming to. The narrator from Invisible Man is not aware of his conformity or his rebelling against it until the end of the novel.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “At the end of the novel, when he is about to leave his hole, he talks about the ‘possibility of action’ and explains that even an ‘invisible man has a socially responsible role to play,’ echoing with mild irony the phrase he once used without thinking.”…

    • 4474 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foner writes in Gateway to Freedom about the secret story of the underground railroad in New York City. He shows the various intuitions that came into being to combat slavery and the impact of the Fugitive Slave Act. The topic is important to remind the audience that history needs to be explored deeply to understand the truth behind great feats such as the underground railroad. The type of reader likely to enjoy this monograph is a history student or anyone interested in a more complete image of the…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book “Crime and Punishment”, Dostoevsky explores the path of Raskolnikov who has faced many difficulties and obstacles throughout his life. He commits murder and is faced with the long and extremely painful journey of seeking redemption. Raskolnikov believes that by the law of nature, men have been divided into two groups of “ordinary” and “extraordinary”.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory Of The Cave

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    That person is so amazed what they sees on the outside that they go back in the cave to tell their prison mates that there is more to the world than just a cave, and they should also experience outside as well. The other prisoners see the freed prisoner as very…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays