Preview

What Is the Advantage of Using Anova to Test for Differences Among Treatment Means Rather Than Testing All Possible Pairs of Treatment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
601 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is the Advantage of Using Anova to Test for Differences Among Treatment Means Rather Than Testing All Possible Pairs of Treatment
What is the advantage of using ANOVA to test for differences among treatment means rather than testing all possible pairs of treatment means?
The advantages of using ANOVA is that (1) If two means are compared the ANOVA will provide the same result as the t-test. ANOVA is a statistical method for making simultaneous comparisons between two or more means. It therefore generalizes t- test to more than two groups. Doing multiple two sample t- tests would result in an increased chance of committing type 1 error. Type 1 error occurs when the null hypothesis, (Ho), when it is true but it is rejected. For example if you have four group (A,B,C,D,) and compare the pairs of mean then you will get six result such as (A vs B,A vs C,A vs D,B vs C,B vs D,C vs D). The probability of not obtaining a significant result is 1-(1-0.05)^6=0.265. This means that your chances of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis is about 1 in 4 instead of 1 in 20. ANOVA compares all means simultaneously and maintain the type 1 error probability at the designated level. (2) Also t-test for comparing two or more means are time consuming than ANOVA.(3) You can use the ANOVA for the three treatment condition but in order to compare the three conditions with the t-test you cannot do so. In research using a two-variable design offers many advantages over using a one-variable design. The first advantage is increased efficiency. The other advantage is that we can analyze the interaction of the two variables in the design. (4) ANOVA is used in the analysis of comparative experiments, those in which only the difference in outcomes is of interest. The statistical significance of the experiment is determined by a ratio of two variances. This ratio is independent of several possible alterations to the experimental observations: Adding a constant to all observations does not alter significance. Multiplying all observations by a constant does not alter significance. If we do an ANOVA test we can do two or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Advantages of the study are that blood tests are objective measurements, so there was no social desirability or experimenter bias when analysing the results. The participants were also compared to themselves which removes participant variables on how they perceive stressors. The experiment was a field experiment so there was no manipulating of the independant variable to deliberately cause stress to the participants which makes it ethical. It also means the research has ecological validity and can be applied to the wider world. However, a field experiment may have extraneous variables which impact the results. For example, the student lifestyle of having little sleep and poor accomidation may have been an alternative source of stress. Another disadvantage is that there was a biased sample used of students. It may not be possible to generalise students’ response to stress compared to the general population.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    RossRAssgnWK9spss

    • 922 Words
    • 9 Pages

    n analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a test which is used to compare the means of two or more independent samples and test to see if the differences between the means are statistically significant. The One-way ANOVA is an extension of the t test for independent samples. The t test for independent samples compares the mean of two groups,fortuantly the One-way ANOVA has the capacity to campare the means of two or more means. ANOVA can compare all means simultaneously. If one was to consider using a t test to compare all means a series of comparsions would need to be conducted with only two means at a time.…

    • 922 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of posttest only design and pretest-posttest design 3. What is meant by sensitivity of a dependent variable? 4. What are the differences between an independent groups design and a repeated measures design? 5. How does an experimenter’s expectations and participant expectations affect outcomes? 6. Provide an example of a factorial design. What are the key features of a factorial design? What are the advantages of a factorial design? 7. Describe at least four different dependent variables. 8. What are some ways researchers can manipulate independent variables? 9. What is the difference between main effects and interactions?…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    exercise 36

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * ANOVA tests differences in relationships among and within groups. To do this, the test requires more than one sample group. ANOVA cannot be used in this situation.…

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bus 642 Week 2

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b. Experimental and ex post facto research designs: In an experiment, the researcher attempts to control and/or manipulate the variables in the study. It is enough that we can cause variables to be changed or held constant in keeping with our research objectives. Experimental design is appropriate when…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    in multiple dimensions. It is a way of identifying patterns in data, and expressing the data in such a way as to highlight their similarities and differences. Since patterns in data can be hard to find in data of high dimension, where the luxury of graphical representation is not available, PCA is a powerful tool for analyzing data. The other main advantage of PCA is that once you have found these patterns in the data, and you compress the data, i.e. by reducing the number of dimensions, without much loss of information.…

    • 3283 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A factorial design, then, is one with more than one factor or independent variable. A complete factorial design is one in which all levels of each independent variable are paired with all levels of every other independent variable. An incomplete factorial design also has more than one independent variable, but all levels of each variable are not paired with all levels of every other variable. One advantage of using factorial designs is that they allow us to assess how variables interact. In the real world, it would be unusual to find that a certain behavior is produced by only one variable; behavior is usually contingent on many variables operating together in an interactive way. Designing experiments with more than one independent variable allows researchers to assess how multiple variables may affect behavior.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some experiments are designed so that two or more treatments (independent variables) are explored simultaneously. Such experimental designs are referred to as factorial designs. In factorial designs, every level of each treatment is studied under the conditions of every level of all other treatments. Factorial designs can be arranged such that three, four, or n treatments or independent variables are studied simultaneously in the same experiment. If two independent variables are analyzed by using a completely randomized design, the effects of each variable are explored separately (one per design). Thus, it takes two completely randomized designs to analyze the effects of the two independent variables. By using a factorial design, the business researcher can analyze both variables at the same time in one design, saving the time and effort of doing two different analyses and minimizing the experiment-wise error rate. Some business researchers use the factorial design as a way to control confounding or concomitant variables in a study. By building variables into the design, the researcher attempts to control for the effects of multiple variables in the experiment. With the completely randomized design, the variables are studied in isolation. With the factorial design, there is potential for increased power over the completely randomized design because the additional effects of the second variable are removed from the error sum of squares. The researcher can explore the possibility of interaction between the two treatments variables in a two-factor factorial design if multiple measurements are taken under every combination of levels of the two treatments. Factorial designs with two treatments are similar to randomized block designs. However, whereas randomized block designs focus on one treatment variable and control for a blocking effect, a two-treatment factorial design focuses on the effects of both variables. Because the…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Facilitation Theory

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction One of the three major principles of the cognitive level of analysis in psychology is that the mind can be scientifically studied by using theories and research models. One theory is the social facilitation theory, which is the tendency for people to perform better on simple tasks when they’re in the presence of others than when they are alone. Norman Triplett’s study on this theory in 1989 is believed to be the first of this kind. Triplett first noticed the effect of social facilitation in his research on racing cyclists.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advantages: Economical in use of Ps, no risk of participant variables confounding the findings as same Ps used in each condition,…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are various pros and cons of this research method. Quantitative research is the best way of finalizing a result by proving or disproving a hypothesis. Results are statistically analyzed and a comprehensive answer is reached. Unbiased and real results can be obtained by proper designing of the experiment. Quantitative research is helpful in testing various results obtained by series of Qualitative research and thus arriving at a final answer. On the contrary above research method is difficult and expensive. It requires that the study groups are randomly placed and it also demands a thorough knowledge of Statistics. Sometimes in order to arrive at the conclusion, retesting is also required which again makes the process more expensive and time consuming. There is little room for grey areas or uncertainty in this method since the final answer is either a Yes or No.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on the normality test that was done, it was shown that the data were not normally distributed so a non-parametric test has to be done instead of a parametric test. Kruskal-Wallis’ test (also called the one-way ANOVA on ranks), was done to determine if there were statistically significant differences between three groups of an independent variable on a continuous variable.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experimental Design

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Experimental design is a research method in which researcher tries to examine causal effects by manipulating independent variable under controlled settings and measures whether it produces any change to the dependent variable. In an experiment experimenter deliberately imposes a treatment on a group of objects or subjects in the interest of observing the response. This differs from an observational study, which involves collecting and analyzing data without changing existing conditions. In an experimental design scientists try to find an experimental hypothesis. To support their hypothesis scientists measures to find significant difference between experimental group and control group when measuring a dependent variable which can be influenced by independent variable.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experimental Design: An experiment to prove my hypothesis could be to evaluate a control group and experimental group based on how many times they hang out with their respective social groups. Group A is the control group that would consist of five eighteen year olds that are daily cell phone users. Group B is the experimental group that would also consist of five eighteen year olds that are daily cell phone users. However, the experimental group will give up their cell phones for a month. The age restriction of eighteen is based on how teenagers use cell phones most frequently out of any age group. This experiment will take place over a month and will be recorded by the amount of times each participant acquaints with their social group. This T-Test can be recorded by the observation of participants. The independent variables for my experiment are the cell phones and the dependent variables are the amount of times the participants are acquainting with their social groups.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay Experimental Design

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Between-subjects designs are one of the most common experimental designs in many scientific disciplines, especially within the world of Psychology. In the case of a tradtional experiment, one group will be exposed to some kind of experimental condition (treatment), while the second group is not, so as to serve as a comparison to the group exposed to the condition. This comparison group is termed as the control group,and the group exposed to the treatment is termed as the experimental group. Participants cannot be part of both groups, if more than one condition is tested, then a completely new group is required in order to perform the experiment…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics