Preview

What Is Nils Christie Conflicts As Property

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
943 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Nils Christie Conflicts As Property
The article Conflicts as Property by Nils Christie was published in the British Journal of Criminology in 1977. Christie suggests in this article that the conflicts of the individual are a valuable property to be owned and that in highly industrialized societies, conflicts have largely become the possessions of legal professionals rather than of those who are directly involved. Christie views this system, which most western legal systems follow, as one that should be abolished in order to more efficiently rehabilitate the offender through reconciliation with the victim as well as those within the community. This summary will outline Christie’s arguments as to why the current legal practices of the justice system are harmful to society as well …show more content…
Christie has accomplished this by exposing some of the underlying negative traits of western legal systems, thus forcing the reader to consider the legitimacy of them; However, he did not provide enough empirical evidence to support his claim that the type of court system he suggested would be possible to adopt successfully. While Christie does acknowledge the hindrances to the development of lay-oriented courts within western culture, his arguments for its potential success are more idealistic than fact based. He only provides examples of true local/lay-oriented courts in non-western cultures, making it difficult to asses whether or not it would be plausible here. A system of restorative process for youths was conducted in New Zealand and like Canada, follows the Westminster system – making it a good candidate for comparison. Although New Zealand is the most well developed example of a restorative justice system such as the one Christie proposes in the article, research shows that “It has been less successful in achieving goals of enhancing the wellbeing of the young people who enter the system and ensuring that they have the skills to be effectively reintegrated into society as people with a potential to contribute to society as well as to benefit from the rewards of participation”. Christie …show more content…
When this occurs, victims may not experience restorative

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions- A Comparative View. (2005). (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge). [24 April 2007].…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Narrowing the judges’ focus to only punishment and retribution would not serve the initial purpose of having a justice system at all. Certain members of the public may believe the opposite. These individuals believe that judges in our court system are too lenient on sentencing the accused. However, how knowledgeable are these individuals in the Australian justice system? In contrast to the expertise judges and Australian judicial workers have learnt through years of experience, must the public’s contradicting, non-expertise opinion determine the outcome of individuals accused of crime? Certainly, the law must take into account the values and expectations of the community. However, it is fundamental to our system of justice that there is the right of an offender to a fair trial must exist – this is protected in our current sentencing system. Under Section 5 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), a court should consider a number of objectives to determine the appropriate sentence; punishment, deterrence, denouncement, rehabilitation and protection. Sentencing legislation also specifies matters that courts must take into account when passing sentence, such as mitigating factors and the offender’s personal circumstances.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    offenders’ rights do not have to be compromised to favor the victim. Communities and law-…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice Act 1992

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of the Juvenile Justice Act 1992 is to establish a code for dealing with youth offenders under the age of 17. The Act regulates the courts dealings with children who come in contact with the youth justice system. This includes police response, diversionary options of rehabilitation against detention, multiple sentencing options, operation of detention centres and recognition of family and community with particular reference to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island communities. A review of the former Juvenile Justice Act 1992 commenced in May 2007. This review was an assessment of legislation to ensure it is providing the best practice youth justice system that has the capacity to adequately respond to demands and challenges of today’s…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    two schools of criminology: the school of classics and the school of positivist. Simply put, the school of classics focused more on the crime and punishment of the criminal whereas the school of positivist focused on the criminal and how to typically “rehabilitate the criminal” in order to prevent the crime. Note that while there may be two distinct schools with differing ideas, there cannot be such a case that is so one sided that fits under that school exclusively, rather it must be a “combination of classical and positivist principles” (Kubrin 9). However,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    “It has been said something as small as the flutter of a butterfly’s wing can ultimately cause a typhoon halfway around the world.” ~ Chaos Theory…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stand Your Ground

    • 2777 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Westervelt, Saundra; Humphrys, John (2001, June 1). Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice (Critical Issues in Crime and Society). Retrieved From:…

    • 2777 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Researchers believed that juvenile courts should be abolished due to the belief that juvenile crime and violence was the cause for public anxiety and most political responses. Because juveniles are considered a major problem, people were led to believe that juvenile courts were no longer a social welfare agency and had become a deficient criminal court. Researchers argued that youth need to be taught to take responsibility for their actions, and thereby when dealing with a juvenile offender judges should use “a sliding scale of developmental and criminal responsibility, as the appropriate sentencing policy mechanism to implement the lesser culpability of younger offenders” (Feld,…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, Australia’s primary answer to offending youth, for serious matters, is incarceration. However, across Australia many believe that the incarceration of youth is still the stem of the issue of recidivism, and therefore, the issue cannot be solved until the incarceration of youth is removed. Between 2011-12 approximately $640 million was spent on the youth justice system nationwide, and even with this much there the recidivism rates are anything but favourable. Approximately half of the juveniles appearing before a youth or children’s court will have been convicted previously, and approximately one-third of juveniles appearing…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper is about a court case, different types of federal and state courts, and new technology used in court cases.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflicts are conducive to society's growth and development. It is not a good indication that crime rate has been decreasing in highly industrialized societies. Our structure of society had led to people’s over-reliance on the modern judicial system and professionals. Christie proposed that individuals ought to participate in resolving conflicts they have created. Victim-oriented court allows victims to participate in the proceeding and they would receive compensation for injuries suffered. That way, offenders would get to receive direct blame from the victim. Christie claims that attention should be centered on the victim’s loss, instead of the offender. Providing compensation and redressing to victims that were affected by offender should be considered a priority. The collaboration between victims and offenders in seeking the resolution for their conflict would enhance interpersonal relationships and understanding between one another. Furthermore, the author indicated that having lay judges would help in presenting a much fairer and consistent resolution, rather than having the skilled, professional judge take over people’s conflicts. A lay-oriented court would be depending on the judgement of people with no legal practice. In the article, The advantages and disadvantages of lay judges from a Swedish perspective, the author states,"career judges are isolated from the real world or at least that lay…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice Reform

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The first five Criminal Justice Acts of the century were spaced out over nearly 50 years, from 1925 to 1972, whereas the last five have come in less than 20 years since 1972 and the current Act is the third in only five years” (Davies, et al., 2010:29). There have been many important legislative changes affecting the criminal justice system since the 1990s. Many of these provided numerous reforms to sentencing, creating a systematic process. There are three legislative changes that could be considered the most significant to the criminal justice system today: the Criminal Justice Act 1991, the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, and the Criminal Justice Act 2003.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies

    • 8135 Words
    • 33 Pages

    First of (any act or omission of duty resulting in harm to society that is punishable by the state. it seems quite clear but there is no clear definition of what those acts or omissions of duty are. This is due to which someone behaves in way that society at that point and time may become legal, or have been legal, at another.…

    • 8135 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays