Preview

What Is Mill's Utilitarian Principles?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Mill's Utilitarian Principles?
Utilitarian Principles
Barbara Lawson
AUPHI208
Instructor Sorensen
October, 20, 2014

Utilitarian Principles In this assignment the theory that was chosen will be the utilitarian that applies to our respecting the environment. The utilitarian theory is that of J. S. Mills and environmental ethics. Utilitarian supports the position is that human interests are no more important or if no greater moral concern than the interests of the worth or their intrinsic value. “Utilitarianism has a two part theory there is the theory of good and the theory of right which compasses the greatest good is happiness and the freedom from pain. Holistic ethics acknowledges that we have duties to humans, holistic ethics place the
…show more content…
Mills defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain. Mills argues that pleasure can differ in differ in quality and quantity and pleasure are either higher or lower. He further goes to explain that the sentiment of justice is actually based on utility (principle of unity), that rights exist only because they are necessary for human happiness. “Utilitarianism offers a very straightforward and direct way to evaluate behavior. When given a choice between two acts, utilitarianism states that the act that should be done is the one that creates the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Philosophers (and economists) often use the term wisely to express this quality utility is the satisfaction one gets from something” as quoted by (Mosser, 2014).
Application
We owe it our future generations of people that we are not to undermine their opportunities for human and sentient life. People do have human worth and rights and our actions will undermine their opportunities for living, we wrong them with our actions that hinders there today or
…show more content…
aware to all future generations a right to a fair share of non-renewable resources [that] out destruction of the environment eventually has serious impacts upon the quality of life in the future. Moral duties to future people therefore contribute to the justification of conservationist environmental policies relatig to various aspects of culture” (Saugstad, 1994). In concluding utilitarianism is a two part theory, theory of good and the theory of the right. Which compasses that the greatest good is happiness and the freedom from pain and suffering. The acts that will promote the greatest good or the (principle of utility) are morally right and acts that reduces happiness and/or acts that promotes pain is morally wrong and that not all environmental ethics believe that a valid environmental ethic must be non-anthropocentric holistic, or embrace the concept of intrinsic values these are dominant themes in our environment ethics, however, and the lack of conscious only highlights the fact that there is no widely accepts alternative to a utilitarianism environmental ethics” (Wolff, 2008, p.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad. Mill is considered a rule utilitarian.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical theory behind justifying an action for being for the greater good. This is a teleological theory because it looks at the consequences of an action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. There are three types of utilitarianism: Act, Rule and Preference. Jeremy Bentham began the Utilitarianism theory. Utilitarianism is a hedonistic theory because it is based on pleasure and happiness. Each utilitarian has a different theory of Utilitarianism and this will be explained in my essay.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism in ethics is the theory that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its usefulness in bringing about the most happiness of all those affected by it. The word utilitarianism comes from the Greek word telos, which means “end”. Under this direction, acting ethically means making decisions and taking actions that benefit the people by maximizing “good” and minimizing “bad” (danielsfund.org). Englishmen Jerry Bentham and John Stuart Mill were too of the most influential developers of the utilitarian view point. Utilitarianism focuses on the pursuit of happiness.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Prisoner Doctors

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mill, J. S. (1863). “Utilitarianism.” Exploring philosophy: an introductory anthology (4th ed., pp. 420-427). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a relativist, consequentialist and teleological system of ethics based on the idea of ‘utility’. This means usefulness and utilitarian suggest that everyone should be the most useful thing. The theory was devised by Jeremy Bentham who said “an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number”. He believed human beings are motivated by pleasure and pain.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Almost any individual will admit that they do not think the same way they did 10 or even 5 years ago. Mills also argues that “happiness is desirable” and I do not agree with this statement with my current definition of happiness. I believe happiness is a feeling you can achieve while taking part in an activity that makes you feel better than normal. So, if you desire to be happy all the time when will you know if you are experiencing happiness. If you spend all your time thinking about being happy you will not be able to tell you are happy until after it passes because so you were so focused on being happy you were not living in the moment. Thus, I think people should not spend their time trying to be happy simply knowing when they are experiencing…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both justice and utility have an argument for results that lead to fairness. Fairness in terms of justice can be seen as what doesn’t violate individual rights, and fairness in terms of utility does not place emphasis on the individual but society at large. Ideas such as impartiality, which justice should result from, can also be directly related and derived from utility. When acting to maximize utility, it is important to consider equally the interests of others, without being partial to your own interests. Justice demands the same criteria. By being partial we do not act just, and by being partial to ourselves we do not act to satisfy the greater good. Utilitarians must value what is most pleasurable for all, not just themselves, and agents of justice must value what respects the rights of others the most and sits well with the majority of society. By having moral rights, Mill sees this as something that we have a duty to protect for the greater good and to impose the most happiness, similar to what justice argues. It is desirable to act from utility. Some moral obligations to act in accordance with maximizing pleasure supersede acting to be just. Justice works to uphold the points in utility that receive greater weight on the scale, and serves as a platform to argue for utility, rather…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Utilitarianism

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper, I will argue for the truth of utilitarianism. In my opinion, the most interesting version of utilitarianism is hedonistic utilitarianism. It is the most interesting because it defies logic and rationale in favor of impulsion decision making. Hedonistic utilitarianism is the most interesting version because it is tied more intrinsically into the wellbeing of an organism, specifically humans, than any other alternatives of utilitarianism. Other forms of utilitarianism are wide-ranging and in my opinion not applicable to everyday decision making processes for one’s actions, whereas embracing a hedonistic decision making process is simple by conforming to ones desires based on impulse and therefore more applicable to everyday scenarios…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, Mill discusses the concept of utilitarianism, defined as, “The doctrine that actions are right if they are useful of for the benefit of a majority.” Mill elaborates on this idea and within the second chapter of his essay, addresses many misconceptions towards this view. Addressing the given quote, one misconception made is that utilitarianism degrades the meaning of life. Some people oppose this view because they think that it is wrong to say that there is no better end than pleasure and freedom from pain. Mill replies to this by saying that there are different qualities of pleasure. He professes about a higher quality pleasure being one which you would choose above another pleasure even if it meant pain…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Well, unsurprisingly, there doesn’t seem to be a universally applicable understanding of ethical principles. In fact, John Stuart Mill asserted that his ideology of ‘utilitarianism’ is subject to development in lieu of that lack of concurrence. In an attempt to disprove the argument that perfectionism requires far more time than is inherently available while one is pressured to make an instantaneous decision. Mill rebukes this objection by agreeing that there is simply not enough time to readily calculate the quantitative and qualitative potential of an action whereby computing the amount of happiness that an action can generate. Instead, he argues that this calculation is already prepared. Mill explicates this misunderstanding, verbatim: “the answer to the objection is that there has been ample time, namely, the duration of the human species. During all that time mankind have been learning by the experience the tendencies of actions; on which experience all the prudence as well as the morality of life are dependent” (Mill 23:35–39). This notion is particularly compelling, considering it is unconcerned with likening ephemerality to reality; alternatively,…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays