Preview

What Are The Similarities Between Russia And The United States

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1141 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Similarities Between Russia And The United States
The Russian Federation and The United Kingdom are among the most powerful countries in the world we live in today. Both countries occupy spots in the top ten of the World GDP Rankings and also in the GDP rankings based on purchasing power parity. Their respective ranks on these lists prove the power of the countries through their massive spending, exports and consumption in international markets. Russia and the UK are both super powers however they run their countries in very different ways. The United Kingdom is a democratic constitutional monarchy, with a bicameral parliament. The Head of the British government is the Prime Minister. Russia is a federal semi-presidential republic. The head of the Russian state is the president and the head …show more content…
The 650 members of the House of Commons are elected through the first-past-the-post system, which promotes two party competition between the Labor and Conservative parties. When the British Parliament Act of 1911 was passed the House of Lords lost its ability to veto laws passed by the House of Commons, instead only giving it the ability to delay said laws or make the lower house re-visit them. This change is what truly made the UK democratic. The representatives in the House of Commons are elected by the people and because of this can be held accountable for their actions. Before 1911, the aristocrat filled House of Lords could veto any legislation passed by the elected representatives, thus taking power away from the lower and middle …show more content…
The current Prime Minister of Her Majesty’s Government is David Cameron, who was appointed to his position by the Queen in 2010. Technically the position of Prime Minister is not mandated by the Constitution of the United Kingdom however it the accepted standard for the current monarch to name the leader of the party with the most seats in the House of Commons the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister may select the 22 members of his or her (in Margaret Thatcher’s case) cabinet from either house of legislature, most commonly though the cabinet members are elected officials chosen from the House of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11

    They wasnted the Lords to never again block a measure passed by the House of Commons. Therefore in 1990 they drew up a bill to curb the power of the House of Lords by taking away the power to veto. Reform of the Lords was vital as the Conservatives were strongly opposed to Home Rule for Ireland, and would vote against any Home Rule Bill in the Lords. This was necessary as the Liberals had promised Home Rule to the Irish Nationalists, in return for their support, so reform of the Lords had to take place before Home Rule could be brought in. The 1910 Parliament Bill proposed that the House of Lords was to have the power to amend or reject those bills the speaker of the Commons certifies to be true money Bills. The Lords veto was abolished, but could delay it for no longer than two years. Also the maximum period between general elections was to be reduced from seven years to five to make parliament more accountable to electors. Although the Bill was not as radical as it could have been because it did not alter the composition of the Lord. The Bill would easily pass through the House of Commons but to curb the Lords’ power would have to be passed by the Lords themselves. Asquith planned to ask King Edward Vll to create 570 new peers, who would be willing to outvote the Conservative Lords and therefore ensure the parliament bill…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did England And Russia Have A Centralized Government
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did England And Russia Have A Centralized Government

    From the 14th century to the 15 century, the nations that exist today were just starting to develop. With everyone wanting power, it was a struggle trying to get land and a nation with a centralized government. Russia and England both fought their way to success by fighting and uniting their people. At the same time, they also both used different methods. While Russia and England both used force and military to have a centralized government, they also both used a different approach to gaining power.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain The Structure Of The State And Commonwealth Parliaments And The Roles Played By The Upper House Lower House And The Crown In The Law Making Process
    • 950 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain The Structure Of The State And Commonwealth Parliaments And The Roles Played By The Upper House Lower House And The Crown In The Law Making Process

    is a Commonwealth country, this means that the head of state is the Queen of England and is…

    • 950 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Have Uk Prime Ministers Become More Presidential in Recent Years?
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Have Uk Prime Ministers Become More Presidential in Recent Years?

    Although the UK has a Head of State, the Queen, most of her powers now lie with the Prime Minister- this proves that the UK Prime Minister is acting like a President- he is the head of government, but also carrying out the duties…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 made the UK more democratic?
    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 made the UK more democratic?

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Make out the case against an elected second chamber
    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Make out the case against an elected second chamber

    The UK currently has a system of Parliament whereby there are two chambers who can pass or reject (or, in the House of Lords just delay) bills. The House of Commons is a fully elected chamber and it is made up of representatives from different areas in the United Kingdom. However, the House of Lords is made up of people who have earned the right of being a Lord through merit. They also have a number of hereditary peers (although there will no longer be any hereditary peers appointed. There have been many calls to make the House of Lords into an elected chamber as people say that the fact that it is unelected reduces the democracy of the United Kingdom and that it is unfair to have an unelected as the peers may not actually represent the views of the people.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far was Britain a democracy by 1918?
    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How far was Britain a democracy by 1918?

    At the beginning of the time period, 1850, Britain was not democratic. There was not a lot of choice concerning the political parties, there were only two parties: The Liberals and the Conservatives. Woman did not have any right to vote and were considered second class citizens. In England and Wales only one million and five men could vote and some men could vote twice. The distribution of seats did not take into account the migration of Britain. The House of Lords (HOL) were aristocracy that were their because of their ancestry. MP’s were unpaid and had to own property so the poorer classes could not be MP’s and therefore opinions not heard. A democracy is one which has universal suffrage, equal distribution of seats, wide range of choice of parties that cover a wide range of issues, everyone has the right to be an MP and the HOL should be trusted members of the public. By the end of the time period, 1918, the majority of these had been overcome, lots of people had the right to vote, redistribution of seats made it more equal, there were now more than two parties, the property qualification in becoming an MP was abolished and they were paid salaries and the HOL lost the right to veto laws and hold them for two years, they could only hold them for one year.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has British constitution been effectively reformed since 1997
    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has British constitution been effectively reformed since 1997

    Modernization is one of the key ways in which the British constitution has been reformed since 1997. Under this falls the House of Lords reform. This reform entailed the 600 hereditary peers of the House of Lords being cut to just 92, allowing the second chamber to be much more democratic. However this is the only part of the reform which has taken place over the last 13 years, and there has been no reform for a fully elected second house – something that would be extremely beneficial to British politics. Until an elected House of Lords is achieved, the second chamber is not democratically legitimate, as the people or representative does not appoint it. Due to this, many consider the House of Lords extremely unaccountable and a massive flaw in Parliament. However, the creation of the Supreme Court means that the House of Lords is no longer the highest court of appeal, meaning that the currently unelected House of Lords is not as much of a problem. A way in which modernization has been effective is in reforms to the way the House of Commons is run; the increase in use of Westminster Hall for debates, the publication of bills two weeks in advance to increase scrutiny and the changes to Prime Minister’s Question Time. The latter reforms have in fact strengthened the UK constitution, in contrast to the reform to the House of Lords, which was essentially ineffective.…

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Similarities Between Russia And The United States
    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Similarities Between Russia And The United States

    Both Russia and the United States have powerful roles in this modern world. They have built up impressive reputations and practically everyone knows of them, but that doesn't make them the same. Because while they do have some similarities, they also have many differences. The first, and most obvious example, would be their opposing governments.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Soviet Union Vs United States
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Soviet Union Vs United States

    America’s government is a democracy which holds republicans, democrats, and millions more Political parties I am sure. The economy is Capitalist, Private citizens control almost all economic activity and, the people vote for candidates for presidential elections congress elections and senate elections mayors. THe people have the control on who represents America. And this is how The Soviet Union's government was like Communist government controlled all property and economic activity. THe Communist Party even establish a totalitarian government with no opposing parties at all. America and Soviets were complete…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is the Prime Minister Too Powerful?
    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is the Prime Minister Too Powerful?

    Canada is a fusion of the British parliamentary system with the American federalism. The Prime Minister is the highest role in the government. He can appoint or remove individual from the cabinet and patriotic appointments. Lloyd Axworthy was hired as a cabinet minister by both Trudeau and Chrétien (Cook & Belanger, 2007: p. 401). The PM controls all justices of the Supreme Court of Justice, vacant seats in the senate, all heads of Canadian Crown Corporations and many more.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Russia Constitution And Us Constitution
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Russia Constitution And Us Constitution

    When the United States of America created the constitution in 1787, it was made to keep balance and order to the people with a civil government. The United States Constitution is known as the oldest written constitution in the world, however it is not the only constitution that was created. Many other countries followed the United State's written constitution and created their own unique and different constitution. One example of a country that created their own constitution is Russia. Russia's constitution is very similar to the United State's constitution but they both have differences and distinctions that set them apart.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    British Political Structure
    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    British Political Structure

    The houses of commons is part of the process of british politics. The house of commons currently holds 647 mp’s in parliament which act as a political forum for Britain. Where MP’s can scrutinise, examine and react to the government polices and actions. After having a debate on a certain issue the commons will vote on how to deal with the issue. MP’s are voted in from 647 consituencys in the general election which takes place every five years. the biggest party majority of mps currently labour will form a government.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics