What Are The Similarities Between Private Property In Free To Choose And Utopia

Both Free to Choose and Utopia share two different but very similar stances on the issues of private property. On one side, there is the belief that private property is good for society, while on the other there is an argument more so between communal property versus private property. In Free to Choose, Friedman expresses that private property is something that is essential to society especially for an ideal free market which would rest on private property. In Utopia, More argues common property versus private property and that, in a similar way to Friedman, that private property is an important part to a country and that a country without private property will have no prosperity however, Raphael Hythloday thinks otherwise and that private property is the source of corruption and causes nothing but problems for a country. Both of these texts regard private property in their own way, similar yet different, which their attitudes on the
In Utopia there is a constant argument between Thomas More and Raphael Hythloday about communal property versus private property. Thomas More agrees with Friedman that private property is an important part of society and that a country or society without it would not prosper. Raphael Hythloday disagrees and thinks that private property is the source of corruption and that our countries should be focused more on communal property and that that is the way of the future. In Utopia, Hythloday explains that due to all property being communal, Utopia in turn lacks many of the problems and troubles that plague a country or society. Hythloday believes that abolishing private property is the only real solution to the problems that plague such countries, by doing so a country would be able to resolves much of the problems it faces. More completely disagrees and that such a notion would do nothing but hurt a society and throw it further into