Preview

What Are the Similarities and Differences Between the Political Systems in U.K and U.S?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are the Similarities and Differences Between the Political Systems in U.K and U.S?
What are the similarities and differences between the political systems in U.K and U.S?

When the U.S. Constitution was being drafted, its writers had the British Parliamentary system to base on. The British system was the system they were used to and had learnt since childhood. However, because the monarchy was one of the main things that the former colonists had rebelled against, any form of monarchy and most forms of concentrated power were avoided.

The most fundamental difference between the political system in the U.K and the U.S is the constitution. The United States has a written constitution which is very difficult to change. The UK does not have a single document called the constitution but instead its constitutional provisions are scattered over various Acts of Parliament, any of which can be changed by a simple majority in the Parliament.

Similarities
Both the U.S. and British political systems have a head of state, a court system and an upper and lower house. The U.S political system has a constitution which lays out the rules for government and the rights of the people, however, the U.K has documents with constitutional provisions which lay out the same rules. Both systems are democratic in nature, as governments are put in place and removed from power by the will of the people and both have systems of checks and balances to limit the power of any one branch.

Head of State
In the U.S. political system, the president is the official head of state. The president is elected under the electoral college system. In the U.K., although the prime minister usually has the spotlight on political matters and is the official head of government, the queen or king is the official head of state. The queen officially signs off on acts of parliament and, just as the U.S. president delivers the State of the Union Address every year, the queen reads the "Speech from the Throne," which is written by the prime minister. In U.K, the monarch is more of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stated In Document 2 “ The constitution makers of 1776 and 1777 had to refer to basic principles partly because they lacked exact models to guide them .. The closest thing to a working model was, ironically, the British government.” After all the colonies only knew about and experienced one government at the time . They used this to there advantage playing off british ideas to create new ones that benefitted them and reflect their own ideas. This indirectly lead to the separation of powers, where no one party / power can outweigh the next .This protects our rights as citizens as now no one can abuse their power to violate them…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biotechnology in London

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, London’s regulation and political view are not exactly the same as the United States; London obtains a political system of the Constitutional Monarchy. The social structure of the United…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After America declared their independence from Britain in 1776 they had no governance system. One year after the Declaration of Independence was signed, and America gained their freedom the Articles of Confederation was signed and served as the governance for the nation. There were weaknesses in the articles such as the inability of the natural government to implement foreign or domestic policy, to tax, or regulate trade, and due to these weaknesses in 1778 the Constitution was the replacement of the Articles. The articles simply did not allow enough power to the national government, and because the constitution maintained state power it also gave the central government power over commerce and foreign policies. During this time, Britain was…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The governments of England and France differ greatly in many ways such the following: they are two completely different forms of government, absolutism and constitutionalism, but they are in many ways similar partly because they both began as absolutist forms of government.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Tea Act

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before the two system was put in place power had to be taken and adjusted. Colonies took and adjusted power from Great Britain for the Article of Confederation. Power was changed and adjusted from the confederation because of fear of anarchy for the United states constitution.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In UK there are two main levels in the system of the government; these are the Central Government and the Local Government. Apart from this there are also various regional governments and the institutions of the European Union that affect the administration of the system of the government.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the moment we have a mixed use of democratic systems in the UK, however we are mainly based on a representative democracy, and a participatory democracy. This is because like a representative democracy, we do elect people to represent us and to be held accountable for their decisions. Also, like a participatory democracy, there are many pressure groups and ways in which people can get involved in politics, without directly voting like in a direct democracy. The UK does hold some features from the direct democracy system. For example, there are referendums and initiatives which enable’s everyone to vote on matters, just like in a direct democracy.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government in the UK is a representative body elected for and by the people. The UK uses the parliamentary system as its model of representation; this means the different areas of government which are the legislative, judiciary and executive branches work in and through each other as opposed to the Presidential model which separates the powers. Westminster Parliament is the acting microcosm for the UK society; it is a small group of 365 MPs who are chosen to represent their constituencies. Each MP is given power through trusteeship when voted in, this meaning that they will try to carry out what is best for their constituency. They are also once voted in known as a mandate, the authority granted by a constituency to an MP to act as its representative.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism involves the sharing of powers between different levels of government. In the United States this relates to the government at national level (the federal government) and those at the level of the state. The United Kingdom is not a federal state instead it is a unitary state where power is held in one place (parliament). Federalism is the process of sharing power between a central government, in America’s case Washington, and the States. The US Constitution dictates what areas the Federal Government have control of and the areas that the States have control of. Amendment 10 of the Bill of Rights dictates that any area that is not a power of Congress, President or Supreme Court it is up to the States to decide. Dissimilarly to the UK, Britain has adopted the unitary system which means that there is just one main body of government as opposed to powers being distributed across the nation. Over time, federalism has adapted and changed and the theory of New Federalism was introduced after Nixon’s and Reagan’s administration and was further mentioned under George W. Bush’s presidency.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British government had a plethora of problems that most people complained about. When the Americans saw these problems they decided to go off and start their own government. This government came along with a Constitution, a Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence. These three things helped the people have, basically a mind of their own, the government was not controlling them.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This form of government is flexible thereby reducing the possibility of anarchy. “When the government is dissolved, the people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative, differing from the other, by the change of persons, or form, or both, as they shall find it most for their safety and good,” (John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, Chapter XIX, Article 220). The American two party system allows the people to differ in their ideas from each other on how the government should lead. Through the election of representatives the people can decide what actions the government will take. “We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us… We must, therefore acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation,” (Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, Paragraph 5). To prevent representatives from gaining to much power, term limits have been placed on both the Executive and Legislative Branches. To farther reduce the President from obtaining to much influence over government he is allowed only two, four-year terms. The Legislative Branch is broken into two bodies the House and the Senate. By constant elections it farther reduces either body from becoming too powerful over the…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political system was set up differently in the two different areas, mostly because of their different religious beliefs. The New England colonies set up a Religious based Oligarchy; the people based all their laws on the rules of their religion. In the New England colonies they set-up town meetings where any man that believed in the religion could vote, this stopped many people so they soon developed the Half-way covenant, to include the people who said they would soon convert to the religion. In the south they setup a representative government called the house of burgess, this was a good idea, but only the wealthy land owners were allowed to participate. The differences in the governmental…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We can highlight that the United States practices wants a federal constitutional republic form of government while the British uses constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary system; if we look at the constitution, it says that, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…” (U.S. Constitution. Art. IV, Sec. 4.). Therefore, the colonies don’t want a king as the head of the state because the monarchy was one of the main things that the former colonists had rebelled against, any form of monarchy and most forms of concentrated power were avoided. Moreover, the United States describes itself as a federation of states, each with their own government and a Federal government to rule them all, which makes sense due to the large and spread-out country; on the other hand England is small, densely populated and much centralized. Furthermore, we can say that the most fundamental difference between the political systems of the United States and the British is the constitution; the United States has a written constitution which is very difficult to change while Britain does not have one but instead its constitutional provisions are scattered over various Acts of Parliament, any of which can be changed by a simple majority in the…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans created a unique government after gaining their independence. The founding fathers completely moved away from the ideas of a monarchial government and created a new one that came from the ideas of a republicanism. During the time of the Revolutionary War we were under the Articles of Confederation, But the Articles granted independence to each state. Which lacked the authority to make the states work together to solve national problems. The Constitution of the United States sets forth the nation's fundamental laws.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays