Preview

What Are The Differences Between Romeo And Juliet

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Differences Between Romeo And Juliet
The Zeffirelli and Luhrmann versions of William Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy, Romeo and Juliet, are similar in several ways. One way that they’re similar is at the beginning of Act I, scene i, Samson and Gregory are at the public place in Verona are talking. When they see the servants to the Montague’s walk by the Capulets servants, one of them bite their thumb at them. Another thing that is similar is when they draw their swords in the Zeffirelli version. In the Luhrmann version, they have guns that are known as “swords” but which are drawn in both versions of Shakespeare's play. In the Luhrmann version, the “swords” they use is a gun. On the clip of the gun, it says Montague or Capulet depending on who the servants belong to. In the Zeffirelli version of the play, the actors would use real swords in the fight scenes. To conclude, there are multiple similarities of William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet. …show more content…
In the Luhrmann version, the Montagues and Capulets would cars instead of having to walk and ride horses. The “prince”, chief of officers, would use a helicopter and uses a megaphone to tell Tybalt and Benvolio to lower their weapons. In the Zeffirelli version, the prince would ride a horse and will have his men follow him. Another difference is that the Lord Montague was riding a limousine in the Luhrmann version. In the Zeffirelli version, Lord Montague runs to the Capulets place and wants to fight Lord Capulet. Lady Capulet was trying to hold Lord Capulet back but he didn’t let her. In conclusion, there are many differences between both versions of the play but are very

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Zeffirelli’s and luhrmann’s individual movies on the Shakespearean play of Romeo and Juliet, they show a great deal of focus on the theme of conflict, which had occurred mainly between the two rivals of the play, the Montagues and the Capulets. Although the movies are based on the same play, they differ quite a lot. Zeffirelli’s version of Romeo and Juliet was set in the 1600s, which was accurate for the play. For luhrmann’s version, he set the movie in the modern era which inevitably causes a drastic difference between the two movies but they both focused their themes of conflict on the help of sound effects, costumes, and visual movements.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann reenactments of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet are wonderful and was and still is very famous for its use of words and the plot of the play itself. All though there are many differences between these two films there are many similarities to the reenactments. The characters from the films had many things in common the character were very funny with their acting and put emotions into their part. The plot line between the two films was very different but had many similarities, the plot was the same by the Montague and Capulet running into each other and then starting an argument leading to a conflict many moments later. The family feud is a strong and very hostile emotion between these two…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the opening scene of the modern adaptation of "Romeo and Juliet", the qualities of the feuding families: The Montagues and The Capulets are successfully exposed to the audience by the use of presentational devices. The director, Baz Luhrmann, has paid deliberate attention to these areas, which successfully portray the rival family member's temperaments. The use of different lighting, colour, music, sound effects, costume and make up are applied to represent the different families to show the distinction of the two. Areas such as framing, location, camera angle and movement help to express the diversity of the two families, making it apparent to the audience the existence of the two families resentment towards each other. This essay will…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann have both directed a film version of Romeo and Juliet very well, but a movie can not capture everything from the book. So, which movie portrayed the book better? There are aspects of both movies that portray the book better. For example, there could one movie could show the character's personality better than the other one or one movie can show the city of Verona better than the other movie did. Small details of a scene could make a scene in one movie a lot better than on the other. Even the smallest of things like the way the characters are dressed could impact the entire scene. In some scenes, the Baz Luhrmann movie portrayed the book better because of the small details…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lurhmann has made a film that is like a modern drama in the way that strange camera angles and movements are used, also there are numerous small adaptations and changes to the script. Both films are a tragedy type film because people die, there is fighting and despair, and two of the main characters die during the fight scene and two more die at the end of the play. Both of the films are also romances, which is obvious, and the main theme of the play/film, but the romance is brought into the fight scene in Lurhmann's version so as to make it feel more important and noticeable. I think that these adaptations of the script by Lurhmann make the film more like a modern…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The context of both Shakespeare in the Elizabethan Era and Luhrmann in the late 20th century impacts Shakespeare’s play, and Luhrmann’s film: Romeo and Juliet. In Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet,’ the social, religious and political aspects of the Elizabethan Era clearly were an influence on the play. For example, during the time at which the play “Romeo and Juliet” was written, religion was involved with politics and there was a small percentage of the wealthy and a large percentage of those who were poor. Verona was a very Catholic place; people were very violent and were openly armed. In the play, “Romeo and Juliet,” the Capulets and the Montagues were amongst the small population of wealthy families and at the time were portrayed as the most important families of Verona. Such a hierarchy was very common in Elizabethan times, with the wealthiest families being the most important and having influence both politically and socially. In Baz Luhrmann’s,” Romeo and Juliet,” the film was set in modern-day Mexico, where the Elizabethan version of Verona was interpreted into the context if the modern world. For instance, in the film, people walk around openly with guns, instead of the traditional swords from Shakespeare’s time. The Capulets and the Montagues, in the film, were set up as the two most important families in Verona, but the modern context influences there wealth to come from financial, and business prowess. In the film “Romeo and Juliet,” Luhrmann chooses to stick to the Shakespearean text and to keep as many customs from the Elizabethan Era as he can, and convert them to the context of a modern world, such as the important code of etiquette and honour for each family. The hate between the two families is shown through the younger generations of the family, the elders are content with being in the background, working the cogs, which in the Luhrmann’s film are the families’ businesses. The context of the Elizabethan Era and the late 20th century both are…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original play by Shakespeare and Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s interpretation of the play are all different versions of the classical tragic story of Romeo and Juliet. When reading the play or seeing Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s film we can observe various differences between them. Juliet, being one of the dominating characters of this story can be seen to be recontextualised differently through her personality, looks and role in society.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Zefferelli version is different because it is the older movie version. One person tells what is going to happen in the movie. It also has fewer lines from the real Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet than the Luhrmann. It also cuts some parts out from the book. They used swords to fight and Mercutio died by being stabbed with a sword. Mercutio dresses normally back then. Romeo and Juliet met in the ballroom and they kiss behind the crowd by the food.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Zeffeirelli’s version the film was very intense and the audience could feel the affection, grief, rage, and enmity of each character. An example can be when Mercutio is giving the famous Queen Mab speech. In this scene the audience can see that Mercutio not just a joker but he also has a dark side. On the other hand in Luhrmann’s version the mood was very comedic and less suspenseful. This was shown from the more humorous yet passionate actors. An example can at the party when Luhrmann dresses Paris in a spaceman suit to make him look ridiculous and uses him as comic relief. This symbolizes that Paris is not what Juliet wants in a man and knows that Romeo is her true love. The passing of time in Zeffeirelli’s version was slower than the faster paced modern version. In both films, a few scenes were left out, such as the fight with Paris at the Capulet’s…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters do have some differences, since they are created in another place and time. For example, Doc is more helpless than Friar Laurence; Det. Shrank shows the dark side (not the wiser side) of the law; the religious side of Maria and Juliet comes from a different motivation. There are also other possibilities for comparison--are the characters Anybodys and Action similar to Shakespeare's clowns in the way they comment on society? Are Rosalia, Velma and the other women Romeo's Rosalind--stereotypes of women by naive men?…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Sweet, sweet, sweet nurse, tell me, what says my love?" (RJ 2.5.55) In Zeffirelli's version of Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 5, Juliet seems bratty and impatient because the nurse fails to deliver the information about Romeo as soon as she walks through the door. Luhrmann made his version more modern, and makes the characters kinder to emphasize their relationship. These movies contain some similarities and differences; they both use some of the same lines, but portray the characters in diffrerent ways and the characters wear different types of costumes.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story, Romeo and Juliet was filled with violence and love. Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet loved each other, even their parents hatred for each other didn’t prevent the star-crossed lovers from being together. Many lives were taken away due to the rivalry between the Montagues and Capulets, including Romeo and Juliet’s. The characters in the three versions of Romeo and Juliet had many similarities and differences. Juliet and Lady Montague stood out to me the most while watching “Romeo + Juliet” by Baz Luhrmann, reading “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare and reading “Romeo and/or Juliet” by Ryan North. In my opinion, the most interesting version was the movie by Baz Luhrmann.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One detailed part that both movies portrayed conveniently and truthfully are the characters of the original play. In the original play of The tragedy of Romeo & Juliet, Tybalt, (Juliet's cousin), is this violently aggressive jealous man with a hot-tempered attitude, which causes him to amuse certain events at the annoyance of his relatives. This can be seen at the feast, as Tybalt automatically amuses Romeo has come to dispute the party based on him being a Montague. “This, by his voice, should be a Montague...What! Dares the slave come hither covered with an antic face, To fleer and scorn at our solemnity? Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, To strike him dead I hold it not a sin,” (Act 1, Scene 5, Lines 53-58 ). This scene shows that Tybalt will take any chance he has to kill a Montague, as long as it's not a sin; thus also showing that he has such a strong sense of honor towards his family. Seeing how Tybalt is described in the original play, both directors made sure that Tybalt’s performance would be as similar to how he’s depicted in the play, to establish Tybalt as the main antagonist in their films. In Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet, Tybalt overreacts in an almost menacing vengeful way when he hears Romeo, as he begins to bang his chest and threaten him with death for the sake of his family. In Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt reacted similarly to when he saw Romeo dance with Juliet at the feast, as he furiously walked afterwards towards Lord Capulet with rage and envy, telling him that he would not tolerate Romeo. Above all, both movies depicted this character truthfully and convelling as the main villain of Romeo & Juliet, by bringing the play’s details to life; thus capturing a small, but crucial part of Romeo & Juliet’s whole essence. However, while both movies were able to capture the essence of the original play’s characters,…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main film interpretations of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" are Zeffirelli's, made in 1968, and Luhrmann's, made in 1997. Although they use the same original script written by Shakespeare, these two films are very different. Zeffirelli's is set in the 16th century, at the time when the screenplay would have first been written whereas Luhrmann has set his film in modern time but still using the Shakespearian language. The most popular and well-known scene of "Romeo and Juliet" is the balcony scene where Romeo and Juliet first declare their love for each other.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie when Romeo heads to the monument he already had the poison. In the play he goes to the Apothecary and buys the poison. Another thing that is different is the letter. In the movie Friar John ha the letter and has his back turned when they ride past him. In the play John is in the house where a sickness is when Romeo and Balthasar ride past him. A third thing that is different is in the play Paris goes to the monument a little before Romeo. In the movie, it is only Romeo that went to the monument. The fourth thing is related to the third difference. In the play, after Paris sees Romeo they fight. When they are fighting Romeo kill Paris. Romeo then says his goodbyes to Juliet. In conclusion, Act V in the play is way different then the Act V in the…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays