Preview

Was The War Against Mexico Justifiable?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was The War Against Mexico Justifiable?
Was the War against Mexico Justifiable? American expansionists sought new territory in the South and West, making conflict with Mexico seem inevitable. Both country wanted land and texas is already rebelling against Mexico. Texans wanted to be separated with Mexico because Texans thinks that Mexico's government is weak and their rules is too strict. Although the United States war against Mexico may be viewed as controversial, the war was just due to Texas, Government of Mexico, and Violence towards Americans. First of all, the war against Mexico invasion of Texas was morally correct because of the restrictions, and Santa Anna way of being tyrant by the Mexican government onto Americans. According to Document A, it states “General Santa Anna, …show more content…
In president Polk’s declare for war on May 11, 1846 he states, “... after a long continued series of menaces, have at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soul…” This shows that Mexico took over America territory and killed 16 American soldiers without neigotate or any greetings. In Document D it states “The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined, in accordance with solemn resolution of the Congress of the United States…” This tells that it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil… Also Mexico was passed the boundary of the United states, has invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon the American soil. Despite the fact that there is overwhelming evidence to prove that the war is reasonable for America, there are those that view that the war is not necessary for America because of slavery. However without slaves, then people won’t be happy and slaves will help crops the food while owners will do their jobs. Additionally, with slaves, it will change people in the good way because people won’t worried about the things in their house and slaves will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    -Polk’s says he send military force “between Nueces and Del Norte” to protect Texas from the Mexican threat of invasion. Military has special instruction not to attack any Mexicans, unless Mexico attacks first in which case the war is then on. The military had set up a camp at Matamoras, Mexican army assume belligerent attitude towards US army.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was not easily negotiated, for the disputes which underlay it went back to the question of Texas. Following the successful revolt of the Texans, including Mexicans who lived north of the Rio Grande, against the dictator Santa Ana, the Mexican government did not reconcile itself to the loss of this vast territory. Instead, it plotted and planned to recover Texas, by military force if necessary. The accession of Texas to the Union in 2 March 1845 poisoned relations between the United States and Mexico and set the stage for the Mexican-American War.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, while the Anglo-Saxon’s openly welcomed the opportunity to migrate into western territories, they may not have anticipated the differences they would have assimilating with their new neighbors. The Caucasians who moved to the western frontier, specifically those who found themselves on the border of Mexico, felt superior to their brown-skinned, Catholic neighbors. This racial superiority was motive for the notion of Manifest Destiny, or, a god-given right for those from the United States to usurp land from less-worthy counterparts in order to continue with the expansion of commerce. Mexico, on the other-hand, had difficulties with the fact that the Americans were bringing slaves into their territory, since Mexico had already eradicated slavery. When General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna sent troops in to promote a centralized authority, however, this did not go over well. This attempt at imposing a central government resulted in a rebel government comprised of American’s and Tejano’s striving for Texan independence. Santa Anna put an end to this provisional government at The Alamo, which killed 187 Mexican and American…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People from Mexico wanted the Nigerian River to be the border, and the U.S wanted the Rio Grande to be the border of the state. Sam Houston came up with the idea that if he went past the Nigerian River and the Mexicans attacked, then Mexico would attack on U.S soil. They did just that, and like that the war had begun. The very first battles were The Battle of Palo Alto, and the Battle of Resaca de la Palma, which the U.S won. Another motivation was the possibility of riches and both countries wouldn’t want to give that up considering that they were dealing with bad economies. This subject impacted society by making a rally cry for Texans “Remember the Alamo”, for instance was one of those cries. Another negative factor was the cost of human lives that was deeply felt by the survivors for many years more than 5,800 Americans were killed or wounded in battle, and 11,000 soldiers died from diseases, in addition to others who succumbed from their war injuries soon after being mustered out of service. The enormous financial cost, estimated at more than $75 million, was another negative factor. Many Mexican Generals also forced peasants into the army for benefit of the…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican War was justified for several reasons. Having more land would strengthen America and provide economic support. “.....territorial growth would actually serve to strengthen it (republic), providing unlimited economic opportunities for future generations” (Manifest Destiny, Haynes). Expansionists also believed that expansion would offer greater access to lucrative foreign markets. Great Britain was our only threat to claim the Pacific coastline, and they were allegedly continuing to plot with Mexico. This gave America a reason to want control of California and Texas. President Polk also stated that the Rio del Norte was included within one of our congressional districts. Mexico passed the boundary of the United States and invaded American…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mexican american war

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The American people were for the Mexican American war because they felt that they needed the land from Mexico, Texas had already gotten independence and because they wanted to achieve Manifest Destiny. When Texas had gained independence it started some border disputes between Mexico and America.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    alamo

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In another article by Stephen Hardin, said that in 1836 the Texans wanted independence from mexico and wanted to defend the Alamo and defeat the Mexicans for their independence. And the Mexicans didn’t want Texas to be independence. They thought that if Texas got their independence then the United States could annexed Texas and be come stronger.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can’t decide if the United States going to war with Mexico was justified or not justified? It can be a struggle to decide. Mexico won its independence from Spain in the nineteenth century. Spain controlled most of Central America. Due to the extremely low population for such territorial extension, Mexico relaxed its immigration policies, as a result, allowing American settlers to help populate the northern territories. Their conditions to settle were self-explanatory. Now what do think? The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because, of the Manifest Destiny, Mexico robbed the United States citizens, and the U.S. wanted to extend slavery and land.…

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As previously stated mexico wanted nothing to do with slavery as she had already abolished slavery. On the other hand, slavery in america was completely normal and very common. In a pamphlet “ The war in texas in 1836” written by Benjamin Lundy, an anti slavery activist, it states, “ The immideate cause and main goal of this war… has been to grab the large and valuable territory of texas from the mexican republic, in order to re establish the SYSTEM OF SLAVERY…” Not only did america want to spread across northe america but they also had hopes of using that new land to build a bigger slave market. The slave market is a cruel way of demanding labor on a human being and to go to war with a country just to gain more land to exauhst innocent people is insane and beyong unjust. Many people including Joshua Gidding felt that the war was unasked for and wrong. Joshua was a us representative at the time and voted agianst the war; in his explanation why he states, “This war is waged agianst an unoffending people, with out just or aduquate cause, for the purposes of conquest; with the design to extend slavery…” Joshua makes it clear that america wanted to make sure the new land would thrive off of slavery but in all, slavery was the reason the war happened. The reason america was so determind to create war would be…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Was the Mexican War a justified act of self defence or an unjustified act of imperialism, and are there comparisons to the recently ‘ended’ wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?”…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, the Texas revolution was the major spark of the whole dispute and was the main reason for war. Texan’s reasoning to break free from Mexico came from the Texas Declaration of Independence. According to this Declaration of Independence, “General Santa Anna, has…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first point to take under consideration is why the Spaniards were there in Mexico in the first place. Diego Velasquez, the wealthy governor of Cuba, placed Hernan Cortes in charge of an expedition to Mexico. Velasquez charged Cortes with the authority to represent the Spanish crown and trade with the indigenous people he would encounter (Díaz). Obviously, Cortes had other plans. Whether he had concocted his scheme for the settlement of the lands he would explore when he accepted the position from Velasquez or if it was something he developed over time is unclear and irrelevant. The fact is that he was not given the power or authority to wage any type of war against the native people. The fact that Cortes did is a direct reflection on him, and any judgment rendered on the ensuing events must be a judgment on Cortes himself. When taking into account that the original purpose of the expedition was in no way violent, one must draw the conclusion that the many deaths that resulted from battles between the Spanish soldiers and the native warriors was largely the fault of Cortes. The blood of those men is on his hands because of his greed and his ego. It was Cortes who made the decision to begin settling the area (which was also…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of “justified” is having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason. The second definition is declared or made righteous in the sight of God. The war with Mexico was both of these definitions. It was justified. In 1836, Texas had won it’s independence and had become apart of America. Mexico had attacked U.S. soldiers on Texas territory. Polk became president. He believed in Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny was the belief that God wanted America to spread across the continent. Polk wanted to fulfill that destiny and get Texas and California. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because they believed in Manifest Destiny, Texas was already apart of America, and Americans were killed on their own soil by Mexicans.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Expansion. By 1815, the United States was beginning to grow further and further west. Settlers were making their way through the Ohio River Valley, the Trans-Mississippi west, and into portions of the Louisiana Purchase territory. By the time Mexico had gained its independence from Spain, American settlers were already on the border of the new nation. The individual reasons for expansion are numerous but we know settlers wanted vast amounts of land (farmlands), and they wanted to explore – making a new life for themselves. Socio and political issues definitely existed through this time period, and these issues were the basis for more conflict between countries.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays