By Darren George
First off, let me preface this argument by saying that the answer to this question might leave many people asking another one: "SO WHAT?" Only you can answer that. As to the implications to world history, especially post-slavery propaganda against “blacks,” this argument imposes many. I'm not attempting to deal with those implications, nor is this a thorough scholastic research. Rather, this demonstrates that simple reason and logic can :-
1) support faith in the Holy Bible
2) reveal truth
That so many people have read the Bible, and yet, I have never heard an argument posed strictly from internal Biblical evidence as to Moses’ ethnicity (even after searching the internet) indicates that truth can remain visible and yet, unnoticed, simply because people don't think; and, that people don't think for …show more content…
Either way, Moses was born during this time and after three months, being no longer able to hide him, his mother placed him in a basket along the riverbank of the Nile. The Pharaoh’s daughter found him and without a doubt, saw his circumcision and yet, had pity on him. She would have probably taken him in at that time, but both for wisdom’s sake and probably because she didn’t have breast milk, asked for an ISRAELITE to nurse him until she could take him in herself. This woman was Moses’ mother and she also got paid by the Pharaoh’s daughter to do so. Fascinating turn of events. Either way, Pharaoh’s daughter took Moses into her house shortly after he was able to eat solid food, and “he became her son.” (cf. Ex. 2:1-10) Immediately you should be thinking, how is this possible in the context of a period of genocide against ISRAEL’S male children? Simple reasoning states three things