Preview

Was Lenin More Significant for His Actions in 1917 or for His Subsequent Actions from 1918 to 1924?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Lenin More Significant for His Actions in 1917 or for His Subsequent Actions from 1918 to 1924?
Was Lenin more significant for his actions in 1917 or for his subsequent actions from 1918 to 1924?

Lenin was a Russian revolutionary and was best known for being one of the main leaders of the October Revolution in 1917 and the first head of the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic. But was Lenin more significant for his actions in 1917 or his subsequent actions from 1918 to 1924? That is the question I will be exploring in this essay and I will be thinking of all of his actions in the mentioned years.

Lenin 's main role in 1917 was to spearhead the revolution. In February 1917 the February Revolution took place, the result of an accumulation of social, political and economic problems caused by the war. In 1917 the war effort caused economic chaos and by February people in the towns of Russia were starving and freezing. Workers and soldiers set up the Petrograd Soviet which elected an Executive Committee, which contained independents and members of political groups, including Bolsheviks. Many of the more prominent Bolsheviks were abroad and powerless. Lenin 's own initial surprise at the news from Petrograd was quickly translated into feverish attempts to return home and catch up with the Revolution.

In April 1917 Lenin published his April Theses. This document outlined Lenin 's aims for the future: to end the war; to give all power to the Soviet; to give all property and land to the people and worldwide revolution. Lenin forced these ideas through despite opposition and skepticism form the party. The April Theses became the basis of the party 's policy. This brought the Bolsheviks much support and made them into strong competition against the provisional Government.

In October 1917 the Bolsheviks staged a coup to take over the provisional Government in Petrograd. Late at night, on the 25 October, Trotsky 's red Guards helped by the Kronstadt sailors took over the bridges in Petrograd and the telephones lines. They cut off Petrograd off from the rest of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) How significant was Lenin’s leadership in the Bolshevik consolidation of power in the period to 1924?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia Timeline

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    14. 23-27 February 1917, February Revolution: After a series of strikes demanding the end of autocracy and the pulling out of WWI, soldiers join the protesters, Petrograd Soviet founded…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the turbulent years in which Lenin had passed, his significance still continued to dominate Russian politics. One clear example of this was his funeral as party members were afraid to read his testimony as it would make themselves look unpopular. This showed that even in death, Lenin’s words still held weight making him extremely significant. Furthermore, many of Lenin’s early policies such as his feminist policies continued to persist through Stalin’s administration as the USSR was the first country to have female pilots and female snipers. Lastly, we can see similarities in both Lenin and Stalin’s policies. For example, Stalin had copied some of Lenin’s “War Communism” as Stalin’s “Collectivization” advocated requisitioning of grain.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonetheless, with the release of the “April Theses” by Lenin, the Bolsheviks support grew. The “April Theses” pushed what Lenin thought Russia needed most at that time: ‘Peace, Bread and Land.’ This vastly appealed to masses of the lower working class of Russia; they had been exhausting this for years; the mass famine across Russia, the land controversy’s that exploited the peasant populace, which approximately made up 80% of the Russian population, and the continuation of the war, which…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky was important in organising and coordinating the actual take over Petrograd in November, but Lenin was even more important because he was a strong leader who guided the Central Committee of the Party and pushed to make the takeover happen. For example, he produced the April Theses, which gave the Bolsheviks clear goals and made them better focused and organized, which was vital if they were going to take over successfully. He also put together the slogan ‘Bread, Peace, Land, and All power to the Soviets!’ which was designed to appeal to a broad range of people and he gave speeches and led rallies to inspire people to join the party. This meant that the Bolsheviks grew in popularity because they were offering people what they wanted – in particular they were the only party who opposed the war and all the other parties were associated with the much-disliked Provisional Government, which seemed to be doing…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How important was Lenin compared to Trotsky in the Bolshevik coming to and consolidating power between 1917 and 1924?…

    • 2658 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Lenin was the most significant leader of Russia and the USSR due to his revolutionary ideas, such as the implementation of socialist reforms, his New Economic Policy in 1921 and the transformation of the Bolshevik faction to the Communist Part of the Soviet Union leading to a huge Marxist-Leninist movement in the USSR. However, when assessing the ‘significance’ of a leader, it’s crucial that four main themes are taken into account, these being – economics, foreign policy, social change and leadership ability. It can be argued that other leaders of Russia and the USSR have been more ‘significant’ in these areas such as Gorbachev and his foreign policy – including his unorthodox approach to the West which incorporated his “New Thinking” slogan for a policy based on ‘shared moral and ethical principles to solve global problems’1 instead of Lenin’s isolationist approach. The actions of other leaders across these themes have had considerable effects of Russia and the USSR and therefore one can infer from this that Lenin was therefore not the most significant leader of Russia and the USSR.…

    • 3048 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is easier to quantify a historical figure’s achievements not by showing what he changed, but rather by showing what the world would be like if he had not been there. If Vladimir Lenin had not been born, there would be no Cold War, no Soviet Union and Russia might still be ruled by a Tsar. However, Lenin was not simply a catalyst in the many changes Russia faced; he was a most volatile reactant in the chemistry of Russian and world politics. Breaking the barrier between attaining both economic success and political achievement, Vladimir Lenin almost singlehandedly ended the Tsardom and brought the socialist “Bolshevik” party to power in Russia. Lenin’s unique experiences in his youth led him to his status as a revolutionary and ultimately changed Russia and the world. Lenin’s early life helped to shape his destiny as a revolutionary leader.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent was the Revolution of February/March 1917, in Russia, due to the nature of Tsarism and the policies of Nicholas II (1894-1917)?…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin became a Marxist in 1889. He had a dream that Russia would be like Karl Marx had predicted, a communist state. He worked tirelessly to achieve this goal. The Bolshevik Revolution occurred in 1917, when Lenin’s political party, the Bolsheviks, took over the provisional government. Lenin demanded that all Russian farmland be distributed equally among the peasants, and control of factories be handed over to the workers. All of this change led to conflicts throughout Russia and the creation of “The White Army” which was made up of citizens who opposed the Bolsheviks who associated with the color red, and were called “The Red Army.” Lenin saw these revolutions and realized that regular Marxism, which had the proletariat voluntarily taking over the government, would not be successful in the 20th century, which is why Marxism-Leninism was created, even if it was not called that at the time. It included an extra push, especially on the working class, as they would not actively want a revolution. Lenin had to incite the working class to fight with him, because they would not do it themselves.The failure of Karl Marx’s prediction, which was the proletariat taking over on their own, pushed Lenin to be harsh and push his beliefs onto citizens of Russia to get his way. The extra push that Lenin used was known as the…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler (Germany)

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He condemned millions to lethal work camps in bloody purges and controlled Russia tightly. In deciding the outcome of World War 2 and being instrumental in starting the Cold War, he perhaps affected the twentieth century more than any other man.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays