Preview

Was Hiroshima Wrong

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1053 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Hiroshima Wrong
War is something that has affected everyone since civilization started. War is between two or more groups of people, their leader usually sending out an army of a sort to attack the opponent. Whether it be internationally known countries, or a child playing with their action figures, war is violent. It causes destruction, tragedy, and loss. Hiroshima was one of the most catastrophic events that took place in history. No one knew what was happening or what to do, since this was the first atom bomb ever dropped on a city. Some say that Hiroshima could have started the cold war. The ethics of war take their place here. People have asked about Hiroshima and the Just War Theory. They ask if Hiroshima was justified, or if it wasn’t and Americans …show more content…
More than one-hundred and forty thousand innocent people were killed, due to the harsh actions of American nuclear scientists. Miss Toshinki Sasaki, Doctor Masakazu Fujii, Mrs. Hatsuyo Nakamura, Father Wilhelm Kleinsorge, Doctor Terufumi Sasaki, and The reverend Mr. Kiyoshi Tanimoto were among the few survivors. Mrs. Hatsuyo Nakamura’s story has really stood out. She was a caring and resourceful person, she was also a very dedicated citizen to Hiroshima. As a tailor’s widow, three children were dependent on her to raise and provide for them. Mrs. Nakamura was the kind of person who was obedient, she did what she was told to do and did it when she was told it to be done. After the bomb dropped, she and her children didn’t endure any physical damage, but she and Myeko suffered radiation sickness for many of the following years. Mrs. Nakamura was the only person whose priority was taking care of a family out of the six. Although some of the males were married and have children, their families aren’t a major part of their stories. She was also the only one who suffered in poverty for many of the following years as an explicit outcome of the bomb. She had no option to ignore her children. They needed her to be there for them, to provide food and drink for them to survive, to make sure they were healthy even though they lived in poverty. …show more content…
It consist of a body of ethical reflection on the justifiable use of force. This theory takes part in overcoming injustice, reducing acts of violence, clarifying when force may be used, restraining the resort to use force, and limiting damage done by war. The Just War Theory consists of seven sections: Just Cause, that force may only be used to correct a grave, public evil, Comparative Justice, where the rights on a side of a conflict must significantly outweigh the wrongs, Legitimate Authority, only duly constituted public authorities may use deadly force or wage war, Right Intention, force may only be used in a truly just cause, Probability of Success, arms may not be used in a cause where disproportionate measures are taken to achieve success, Proportionality, the good to be achieved must outweigh the overall destruction to be expected, and Last Resort, forced may not be used unless all other peaceful alternatives have been seriously tried and exhausted. Hiroshima was not a just case. Japan was already losing, they would have ended up surrendering before. The United States could have dropped it elsewhere, to try to scare them into surrendering when they saw the power of the bomb. The people of Hiroshima ended up with radiation sickness in the years following, they suffered in torture that the United States inflicted upon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mrs. Nakamura’s struggle was that she was not able to get hired for a job because of the disease’s and problems that she faced from when the bomb was…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The horrors of August 6th and 9th of 1945 can in some respects, be compared to Sherman’s “March to the Sea” during the Civil War. In both cases, the military’s targeted objectives were not necessarily connected with the war and instead followed the “scorched earth” policy, Hiroshima obviously more so than Sherman’s ordeal. The goal of both of these war aims was to break their opponent's’ spirit. Whether or not they were successful is up to interpretation, though evidence points to not successful in Hiroshima’s case.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During wartime, horrible atrocities against all of humanity must be dealt with. Crimes against humanity, as never witnessed before, and hopefully to never be seen again, occurred during the course of World War II. The security of our nation and of other allied nations was severely threatened, not only by the Germans, but by the Japanese. The Japanese were a strong people willing to fight till it was no longer possible. It may even be said that they were suicidal, with their kamikaze pilots and no real hope of defeating the allied nations. America has always, and most likely will always place a high value on American lives. In order to protect these lives and to insure that the world is safe for democracy, American leaders had to make a very tough decision, whether or not to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. This act would essentially be trading Japanese lives for American lives. The Japanese, who were the aggressors, much like the Germans, were not sympathized with. They were responsible for hundreds of thousands of American casualties in the Pacific, including the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. With Japanese forces showing no signs of surrender, American leaders made a decision. A decision that changed the history of warfare forever. On the week of August 6, 1945, the first and the last atomic bombs ever used during war were unleashed against Japan, vaporizing two of its largest cities.…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to The United States war crimes, killing civilians during war is a serious offense, the US did exactly that when it bombed Hiroshima in 1945. The tactic that America took to end the war resulted in the deaths of nearly 146,000 people; this was unacceptable because the citizens of Hiroshima were unarmed and were not part of the police force. This act was not a reasonable resolution to the war, it was a genocide that occurred because of a poor decision. Killing civilians during war is a serious violation (The United States war crimes). The bombing of Hiroshima was an unreasonable act that took the lives of thousands of innocent people, the majority being civilians.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan's empire had shattered, and Nazi Germany had just surrendered. President Truman had decided to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There' been a debate ever since on whether or not his decision was reasonable. Japan was ready to surrender and on the verge of collapsing. One could argue that the bombing was barbaric and unnecessary.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have investigated whether the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary and what effect the bombs had on ending the war in the pacific. The government of the United States of America were divided in opinions on how to use this weapon of mass destruction, and its impact on history. However now, the decision for dropping the atom bomb was an extremely complex and connected to a wide array of problems, and many of them simply went beyond the goal of the surrender of japan. Through analysing the many intertwined issues, I personally believe that the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified, as it had saved more lives, not just for the allied forces, but also…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States’ decision to bomb two cities of Japan, which we’re Nagasaki and Hiroshima, was not at all justified. Many people know that Japan deliberately attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, in order to strategically weaken the American Naval Base. However, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to push Japan to surrender the war . The bombing was unjustified because the U.S. military: targeted heavily populated civilian cities, deliberately planned their attack to kill, did not give Japan enough time to respond to the first bombing, (4) did not experience as many casualties than Japan.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War II was a war between governments, by dropping the bomb; they put the innocent people of Japan in danger too. The two cities were of limited military value. Civilians outnumbered troops in Hiroshima five or six to one. Japanese lives were sacrificed simply for power politics between the United States and the Soviet Union (as stated in Document B). By dropping the bomb the US was hurting the citizens (people not involved in the war) more than they were the government, the people they were really fighting against. Between the two cities, there was an estimated 105,066 dead, and 94,000 injured; that’s almost 200,000 causalities total (document A).…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just nearly three years into the war America had lost already 400,000 young American soldiers. The US was starting to prepare to invade Japan’s main land. The US started to draft more young Americans. The US estimated it would need at least five-million-man power to invade Japan’s. At that time, Japan population was around seventy-one million citizens and seven million Japanese soldiers. The US already had drafted more than a million soldiers to support the war in Europe and the Pacific. It would probably take about another five years to overtake Japan. American didn’t want to keep on losing more young men to the war. So, the US went into the dilemma of either keep on with the war and lose more human lives to the war or drop the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima with the hopes it would end the war. And finally, they came to a decision on dropping the bomb. They planned at first to drop the bomb on Tokyo Japans capital city and most populated city at that time. The bomb would’ve killed more than a million civilians. So, they decided to drop the bomb on Hiroshima which it’s was a smaller city and with a smaller population than…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many farming estates had been heavily damaged. Thus, leading to poor trade and disease. Radioactivity was transferred from the crops to the significant amount of people still alive. Pushing the ‘people who were not injured in the bombing, … [to] dying mysteriously and horribly from an unknown something which can only [be described] as the atomic plague.’ A British journalist wrote describing concern 30 days after the bombing. Up to 70,000 people were killed and another 70,000 were left injured. The few people that were still alive were forever traumatised.‘The skin was burned off some of them [the people] and was hanging from their hands and from their chin’ A young girl aged five at the time had witnessed. For many families, the moment someone had walked out the door, was the last time that they would ever see each other again. In comparison, the Pearl Harbour bombing did not affect as many people in which the way of the Hiroshima bombing did. An entire city was affected and damaged for years after the bombing, whereas, the pearl harbour bombing…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Historian A had a lot of reasonable and strong perspectives on the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. She views the United States was not justified in dropping the bomb. A huge argument begins with the U.S. knowing that Japan was trying to surrender. This is a great example of unnecessarily kicking someone when they are already down. The Japanese wanted peace and tried to surrender, the only condition was that they could keep their emperor. The U.S. declined and said they had to have an “unconditional surrender.” After the bombing, the U.S. let Japan keep their emperor anyway. The U.S. could have saved so many lives if they had just let the Japanese surrender earlier, considering they gave them their one condition they requested. It seems cruel and impractical of the U.S, because the damage we created was so drastic and clearly unnecessary. Another argument arises when it comes to the true reason why the bomb was dropped. Since Japan was already surrendering, why even drop the atomic bomb? We had won. Historian A claims that the bombing was used as a scare tactic for Russia, showing them what the U.S. could really do in battle. The Japanese were basically a guinea pig and a test, which is completely inhumane. Scientists who worked on the bomb insisted it not be used on people and rather on empty land which would still make a huge statement. The U.S. rejected this idea and bombed the city anyway, causing mass destruction. This was a monstrous and malicious move, killing over 100,000 people who had tried to surrender and just to scare another country. None of this was right on behalf of the United States.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays