Preview

Was Germany Responsible For World War 1

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Germany Responsible For World War 1
Were German Militarism and Diplomacy Responsible for World War I? I don’t think that German Militarism and Diplomacy was responsible for World War I. I think that every country that was involved played a part in the start of World War I. Although Germany did play a role in the start of World War I, you can’t solely blame them. As disagreements occurred, countries banned together and formed the great powers. On page 138 it states, “Germany and her allies were held accountable for the war and all concomitant damages.” Yes, Germany did cause problems, but it wasn’t just their fault. Germany did in fact use militarism and diplomacy to attack other countries, but I think that there were many other factors that contributed to the start of the war.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why did Germany start World War I? They didn’t. The Big Four, Woodrow Wilson, David Lloyd George, Vittorio Orlando, and Georges Clemenceau weren’t justified in making Germany take the blame for WWI because Austria and Hungary were the countries who had started war with Russia, France and Serbia. Germany entered the war and fought for Austria and Hungary because they were bound by treaty, in fact Germany called a cease fire but Austria and Hungary kept battling.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the sources give different impressions as to wether Germany's leaders are responsibe for the outbreak of the First World War. Source 1 seems to strongly suggest that German leaders and the German Government did in fact push for the war with Hewitson blaming the Army and suggesting that Germany was looking for an opportunity to start war however he does not fully support the view that German leaders were responsible.Porter and Armour (Source 2) strongly supports this view by again pointing to the millitary and prime minister Bethmann Hollweg looking for an opportunity to wage war but again not fully placing the blame on Germany but looking at the threating actions of Russia and Britain. In contrast to both Source 1 and 2 Norman Stone ( Source 3) does not blame Germany, instead he suggest that the tension in Europe for the last decade finally reached an ultimatum in the July crisis and the war was the fault of all Great powers.…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German delegation leader believed that Germany was not at all responsible for world war one, the Treaty of Versailles take it that Germany is the one responsible for this war due to their loss(Doc.4). At the delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference the German delegation leader had protested that one of the causes of this war was imperialism. The method of imperialism added to the threat to other countries because of its policies of retaliation and expansion(Doc.5). As a result of there being an expansion throughout European nations, mobilization occurred. Mobilization lead to militarism adding to the factors of tension and threats. While, both the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In source 1, JCG Rohl and Keith Wilson undoubtedly present Germany as being solely to blame, supporting the ideas of Fritz Fischer. Indeed, they highlight, “Far from being willing to accept British proposals for international mediation in the looming conflict, Bethmann Hollweg and Jagow advised the Austrians strongly against accepting them”. Therefore suggesting that Germany encouraged Austria throughout the July crisis to be aggressive and favored war over peace. Evidence to support this lies strongly with the blank cheque Germany issued Austria on July 5th, which pledged unconditional support for their allies in whatever action they decided to take against the Serbs. Therefore, by offering their full backing, they were knowingly giving Austria the option of war, thus it can therefore be argued that Germany pushed for the outbreak of world war one. This view is also supported in source 3, in which C Lee states, “methods of violence became the national vices of pre-war Germany, making the country an object of alarm to every leading nation”, thus suggesting that Germany was the main aggravator in the events leading up to war. Indeed, in the second Moroccan crisis, Germany attempted to bully France into giving her the French…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    causes of WW1 dbq

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One underlying cause of World War I was militarism. Militarism is when nations invested heavily in their armed forces in order to remain stronger than one’s enemies. Well first Great Britain spent the most money on its navy so it could have a very strong military. Also Germany spent the most money on its army, to also have a very strong military. This evidence supports the claim that militarism was an underlying cause of the war because Germany had the strongest power on the continent. But the British navy was the strongest in the world. So obviously both countries, Germany and Great Britain, began to battle to see who had the strongest and most powerful military in the world.…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wwi Dbq Essay Example

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One cause of World War I is militarism. The empires wanted to show who’s the strongest. They built a stronger military and weapons to show how strong they are. Document 1, shows how weapon prices increased in some countries. Military power is seen as a symbol of national prestige. Prestige is respect and admiration felt for someone or something on the basis of their achievement or quality. Militarism is the glorification of war by all powers. It is an arms race among great powers. In document 6, the Europeans are blamed for the start of World War I and now the mobilization of their armies for war. If one country built something, then the other countries would try to build something stronger and better. They believed in Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is the idea that stronger nations can dominate weaker nations and spread their culture and ideas. Militarism had a great influence and was one of the causes of World War I.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I as Germany blame England as being responsible for starting World War One because they started Imperialism. Imperialism led to alliances, nationalism, and militarism. To begin with, the Treaty of Versailles says that England’s Queen Victoria caused the Scramble for Africa. Knowing this, England basically forced me to create alliances because I felt that England was going to become too powerful and be too threatening. England created tensions because of their need to feel superior which is why it is not a surprise that we got into a war. Having the alliances got all of Europe involved which made it into World War One.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War Two was a time of devastation and misfortune for all people in the world. The war lasted for six years, and involved more than 200 countries, costing fifty-five million lives and material damage of some three billion dollars. WWII was said to be the easiest war ever to be prevented, but once it started there was no stopping it. What or who could cause such a devastating war? Many people place the blame on the country of Germany. Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, which was the start of the war.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document C it shows the Growth in Armaments from 1890-1914 . The growth of Armaments is a Prime example of Militarism of World war I due to Nations eventually are going to use the weapons the build. Another example of Militarism being the underlying cause of World War I is found in Document D The Hammer or the Anvil which quotes” We don’t want to be become… the slaves of Humanity ‘ slaves of humanity.’ But we’ll only be able to keep ourselves at the fore if we realize that there is no welfare for us without power, without a strong army and a strong fleet.” This is stating that without an strong army on ready to fight in a instance Germany will be trampled by other strong nations. Therefore Germany and other Countries had the same idea and invested in weapons and war and therefore with all these weapons on standby they’ll eventually use…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Have you ever wondered what World War 1 was like? Do you ever wonder how many people died to save our country and for World War 1 was like our freedom? Over 18 million deaths and 21 million wounded. They were fighting people for 4 years, 1914-1918. Each side had many reinforcements to take place after one died.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One cause of World War I was Militarism. Germany had an industrialized military and spent millions of dollars trying improve and prepare them for war. Many other countries seen this newfound competition and started to try and rebuild their armies and navy so they could keep up. With Germany’s new and improved army, they started to gain confidence and were convinced that they could win a war. Germany was very focused on utilizing their army. As soon as the war declared, Germany without a doubt didn’t hesitate to “make the first move.” This caused a problem however because of the other nations rush to industrialize their armies and try to make them just as good or if not better than Germanys. Militarism played a huge part in the cause of World War I.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of causes for World War I was militarism, this played a big role in the war because many citizens wanted to test their military against other countries which caused war. All the countries were in a race to become the most powerful and certain countries wanted a chance to prove themselves by using their military. As the race continued to be number one many countries were left with a big military and nothing to do with it. The citizens of these countries were very proud and supportive of their armies. In the schools the kids were thought that…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of World War 1

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    World War 1 was fought between the allied and the central powers from 1914 to 1918. It was fought between the central powers consisted of Germany, Austria- Hungary, Turkey and Italy and the allies consisting of U.K , France, Russia and U.S.A. The war in itself is considered a notable example of a total war as all the belligerents used every means of warfare including chemical warfare to try to win.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays