Preview

War -- What Is It Good for?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War -- What Is It Good for?
Is war really ever justified? All different kinds of people, in all different corners of the world have different opinions on this controversial issue. Many people think that war is never justified, many think that war is always justified, and there are some people who think that it completely depends on the situation of the battle. This situation is not a new one, it has not become easier to understand over time, and will never totally be resolved between every single person.

The idea that war can never be justified would be a very simple way of thinking, and in the best interest of everyone. However, certain politics of the world cannot let it be so. Certainly, it would make it so much less complicated if we made it illegal to ever start a war. Would this really help out the situation? People still steal, murder and sell drugs even though they are illegal, this would not make a significant impact on the world as a whole if war were to be made illegal. Some countries do not really have a choice as to if they are going to fight or not. When Germany declared war on France, when France had nothing to do with the current wars that were going on, other than being in the Triple Entente with Britain and Russia, France really had no choice in the matter, it was either fight back or be killed. Whether or not war has been justified, it is not going to stop countries from invading.

Thinking that war is always justified, usually is a thought of people in the place of power and political standpoint. This isn’t always the case, but generally when people are in a standing like this, they become power-hungry, and feel the need to invade and declare war on other countries. The belief that war is always justified is not practical, if a country decided one day that it doesn’t like the law of the age to vote in another country, does that mean they have to go to war to resolve it? More importantly, if a country has had nothing really going for it lately, but happens to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What is meant by this is that taking another man's life becomes easier the more often you…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During World War II and the War on Terror, there are many moral issues. One of the questions that people ask regarding the wars is: is reasoning for going to war justified? On December…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War should never be used unless it is the last option available, and only if peace will really come as a result of the mass suffering and disaster. As General Dwight Eisenhower said in a message to his invasion troops, "You will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security to yourselves in a free world" (39). The best way to solve a conflict is not to resort to violence, but rather to words. If war is inevitable, then those who had nothing to do with it should be left alone and not involved, such as innocent…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War Benefits

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An example for going into a war due to involvement by the country, is the French involvement in Vietnam. Due to colonizing Vietnam, the French didn’t want to lose said area; so they went to war. Second, is alliances. Alliances are a strategic reason to become involved in a war, because then when your country needs the help, alliances will have your back. Countries without alliances are at risk for attack or imperialism. The third reason of benefits for a country is a risky justification. Many Americans were dissatisfied with US involvement in the Frist Gulf War due to the hidden reason of wanting to obtain Kuwait’s special oil. However, benefits such as stopping terrorism by being involved in the War on Terror are more than enough. If lives will be saved in the long run by going to war, the war is just. Lastly, a just reason for going to war would be if injustices are happening. The only example needed more this rationale is the countless lives lost when Adolf Hitler decided that those not of his Aryan ideal could be wasted. War is not an end all to problems, but it is at times, the only…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is ubiquitous; there will always be one country at war with another during all the times of the year. The first recorded war was in 2700 BCE in Mesopotamia between Sumer and Elam, and the latest have been the Syrian and Iraq wars. Although there have been countless amounts of changes in warfare since 2700 BCE there will forever be a constant controversy about what good comes from war. While soldiers are risking their lives across the world civilians are at home contemplating the pros and cons of warfare. Though trauma that accompanies war is unforgivable, war is not entirely useless. Without it countries and people around the world would be taken advantage of. The destruction left behind by war is nothing in comparison to the catastrophic…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wars are all preventable and cruel to all people involved especially to the small who is fighting for big companies oil sometimes laying down their own life, “Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind”- John F.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics War

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the just war theory there are two principles which must be followed when a country considers entering a war. The first is the jus ad bellum which defines rules and obligations to be satisfied just before going to war. The first condition states that a country enters a war only if there is a just cause. Mainly, the just causes are protecting innocent life, preserving necessary decent conditions to the humans and also to secure basic human rights. It is justified to defend another nation that is itself the victim of aggression. A war must only be declared by a competent authority entrusted with the common…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jus a bellum, the right to go to war, explicitly describes how a nation-state should conduct itself before preparing for war. There are seven sub-categories within Jus a bellum: Just Cause, Comparative Justice, Competent Authority, Right Intention, Profitability of Success, Last Resort, and Proportionality. Just Cause is explained as needing to have a reason to go to war. Not just for recapturing material possessions, but if lives are in danger. Comparative Justice is described, as the suffering and injustice on one side within a war must outweigh the suffering and injustice on the opposite side. Competent Authority must be in order within a war. Nation-states that start war must only start it if the authorities within the nation-state are focused on justice. Right Intention is defined as; force may be only used for a just cause correcting a suffered wrong. Gaining or maintaining economies by a nation-state is not considered just. Profitability of Success indicates that arms are not to be used where unbalanced measures are pertinent to be successful. The Last Resort category is presented as; force in war may only be used if peaceful alternatives have been completely depleted. The final category, Proportionality, is the foreseen benefits of starting war must be proportionate to its expected wrongs.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The war is a necessity now to maintain alliances across the world. War is one of the few ways a country can show its loyalty to its allies. An example of this is during the Vietnam War. During the Vietnam War our allies, the French, where experiencing difficulties keeping Vietnam as one of their colonies. Since we want to keep the allies we have we offered help in fighting against the Vietnamese people.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Things They Carried

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    War presents a very complex moral dilemma. While it is necessary to fight for freedom, a better world, and what is right, war contradicts itself. The very same soldiers that fight in defense of these values have them taken away because of their experiences at war. The negative effects are just as big as the positive effects of war. A nation can never really win in war because of this. Instead war just stays a neutral thing.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War theory points out that there can be motives for going to war that do have a moral content, and just war theory claims that war can, under certain conditions, be morally justified. Proportionality is perhaps the most utilitarian of all Just War tenets. It calls upon leaders not to lose their head and engage in costly conflict if there are cheaper (e.g. economic, diplomatic) options available to them. There are three main opponents to the Just War theory: the decision to go to war (jus ad bellum), how war is fought (jus in bello), and how conflict should end (jus post bellum). Jus ad bellum are often due to self-defense, the defense of others from aggressive attack, the protection of innocent people from aggressive regimes, or corrective punishment for aggression past action. All involve the ‘resistance of aggression’, the violation of basic rights by use of armed force. Jus in bello, means justice in war, and has traditionally been concerned with the treatment of the enemy (i.e. there is a distinction between combatants and non-combatants. Only combatants may be targeted). Jus post bellum concerns justice after a war, which includes peace treaties, war crime trials, reconstruction etc. However, theories like Realism say that moral concepts cannot be applied to questions of war (or foreign policy generally) (Patterson).…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module 2 Essay

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page

    It is reasonable to conclude that all wars are bad, but, in rare cases, war is forced upon the participants by the actions of one or all parties. It is also reasonable to believe that the negative effects of war, in all cases, far exceed the potential benefits. The fact is there are no good wars.…

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justifying War

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Sterba states in his article entitled Reconciling Pacifists and Just War Theories that it is undeniable that wars bring huge amounts of death and destruction, with many of those being innocent people. He states that with the amount of innocents killed during wartimes, it is almost impossible to justify warfare at all. The killing of innocents is looked at as a major violation of our social norms and, outside of war, is punished under the full extent of the law. During wartime though, killing is permitted, even glorified at times, whether it be an enemy combatant or an innocent bystander who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. However, despite all the bad that comes from war, such as death and fear, war is necessary for the entire world to make progress and advance ourselves forward as a whole. War brings about change, changing of ourselves and changing of the world around us. War brings about new technology, new friendships, unification, and even hope for a new tomorrow. Through past wars, we have learned how we should act as a country, learning from past mistakes made and making ourselves better as a whole. Though the killing of both innocents and non-innocents alike is not permitted on an everyday basis and is considered morally wrong, warfare and all that is brings is morally permissible if and only if there is justification for it.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are lots of arguments to say when killing is justified as in the case of a war. In World War II the Nazi’s attempting to kill all the Jews in the world was definitely not justified, but on the other hand the Allies killing was justified because they were trying to keep the Germans from taking over the world and because of this we live in the world we live today.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays