Preview

War is Inescapable Part of Human Experience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War is Inescapable Part of Human Experience
Serge Kharlamov
III-FPS-1
War is an Inescapable Part of Human Experience
War is so omnipresent and commonplace in human history that some scientists even claim that people's war-proneness could be explained by natural predisposition dictated by genes. Even though a military conflict is too complex to be triggered by nothing but an innate inclination, aggression that fuels it seems to be integral to social behaviour. Therefore, war can be regarded as an inescapable part of human existence. First of all, war is an essential part of social experience, as it is provoked by inevitable clashing of interests of nations on a global level. Such conflicts arise because of a perceived incompatibility of actions or goals of hostile parties. A good example here is a "Cold War logic" which only relatively recently stopped prevailing in international policies of the most of developed countries. It refers to the way of perceiving foreign affairs in general as a "zero sum game", meaning that there exist only two possibilities - victory or defeat. Consequently, human society is prone to war because rival parties see aims of each other as mutually exclusive.
Secondly, war often derives from people's most innate predisposition to survive in a world where resources are scarce. Such scarcity, has resulted in a some kind of struggle for existence leading back to the times, when ancestors of the Homo Sapiens competed with other species for food and habitat. Although nowadays people do not have to fight for such basic necessities, there always will be things considered to be rare and vital, for instance, oil and natural gas. Thus, it is one of the most primitive instincts of fighting for survival which makes one engage in warfare.
Last but not least, a military conflict is a ubiquitous phenomenon because war begets war. There can be seen a recurring pattern in the outbursts of international aggression - war spreads in the manner of an infection, reproducing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Although all wars are conflicts, not all conflicts are wars. Conflicts don’t always have the involvement of armed hostiles, battles or even the involvement of the military. Conflicts can range from anything as little as an argument between politicians, all the up to an official war. Many people believe since World War 2 there have been less conflicts; however there has simply been less conflicts between nations and more within nations. One of the biggest reasons for this is that 90% of countries are made up of different ethnic groups and cultural groups. Some people do not like different types of people in their country which leads to conflict.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If warfare was just a natural instinct that all humans had then all groups of people around the world would use warfare to further their civilization. Instead, since warfare is an invention of man instead of a natural part of humanity some groups around the world no nothing of warfare whatsoever. Along with these groups there are also many groups, like the Pueblo Indians who only used warfare to defend their civilization, and did not use war to expand their own lands and influence. Had it not been for another group bringing war to them they would have most likely never partaken in war themselves.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it greed? Or even possibly power? Or even just for the enjoyment? Nobody knows why war has started but we do know that war has been going on since man was born, there is an undeniable proof of war all throughout history. War has been compared to as a chest match, the whit and strategy of one general versus another army to army; some generals chose to just try to outpower their enemies, while others tried to outsmart them.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warfare Reformatted

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    IS WAR A BIOLOGICAL necessity, a sociological inevitability, or just a bad invention? Those who argue for the first view endow man with such pugnacious instincts that some outlet in aggressive behaviour is necessary if man is to reach full human stature. It was this point of view which lay behind William James's famous essay, 'The Moral Equivalent of War', in which he tried to retain the warlike virtues and channel them in new directions. A similar point of view has lain behind the Soviet Union's attempt to make competition between groups rather than between individuals. A basic, competitive, aggressive, warring human nature is assumed, and those who wish to outlaw war or outlaw competitiveness merely try to find new and less socially destructive ways in which these biologically given aspects of man's nature can find expression. Then there are those who take the second view: warfare is the inevitable concomitant of the development of the state, the struggle for land and natural resources, of class societies springing not from the nature of man, but, from the nature of history. War is nevertheless inevitable unless we change our social system and outlaw classes, the struggle for power, and possessions; and in the event of our success warfare would disappear, as a symptom vanishes when the disease is cured.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One reason there are wars is when two countries are at a disagreement, like in the civil war the south and the north were having disagreements about slaves. Other times it´s about an offence like if some Korean soldier came over and shot 30 people we would probably declare war on Korea. Sometimes it´s when we get forced into a war, like when Japan bombed Pearl harbor they forced us to defend our country.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Mead Warfare

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “If people have the idea of going to war and the idea that war is the way in which certain situations, defined within their society, are to be handled, they will sometimes go to war” (Mead 503). This proves that if the idea of war is implemented by a society and engraved in the minds of the citizens, the people will see war as necessary. A prime example of this is that of the Andaman’s. This low-level society, which participated in hunting and gathering traditions, lived simpler than the Eskimos. Even with this lack of sophistication, the Andaman people knew about warfare. This society had an army of only fifteen people, yet they still battled in war. The underdeveloped Andaman society demonstrates that war is an invention of society. The Andaman people knew very little and still they engaged in war because it was an idea that was etched into their head by their…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is ubiquitous; there will always be one country at war with another during all the times of the year. The first recorded war was in 2700 BCE in Mesopotamia between Sumer and Elam, and the latest have been the Syrian and Iraq wars. Although there have been countless amounts of changes in warfare since 2700 BCE there will forever be a constant controversy about what good comes from war. While soldiers are risking their lives across the world civilians are at home contemplating the pros and cons of warfare. Though trauma that accompanies war is unforgivable, war is not entirely useless. Without it countries and people around the world would be taken advantage of. The destruction left behind by war is nothing in comparison to the catastrophic…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lysistrata And War Essay

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essay '"'Warfare is only an invention-not a biological necessity'"' Mead emphasizes the point that man was not born with the need to War. She states '"'warfare of this sort is an invention like any other of the inventions in terms we order our lives'"' (Mead 20). This is made clear by the civilizations that she uses as examples who do not know what war is. '"'Does not the absence of war among the Eskimos, just go to confirm the point that it is the state of development of the society which accounts for war and nothing else?'"' (Mead 21). Mead also points out other civilizations that do not have a war per se but do have a form of conflicts. War is created by the civilization and its surroundings that push…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War occurs if one party harms another party, and people have voiced their concerns about the situation, requesting for war as kind of like a solution, after an understanding (Thucydides 1954, 69). Thucydides presents that this will yield positive outcomes because of their military competence and firm discipline in implementing commands (Thucydides 1954,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 5th century, the philosopher Plato insightfully noted, ‘Only the dead have seen the end of war,” with history showing this to be true. People have continued to engage in all manner of conflicts, be they petty arguments or large-scale confrontations from which valuable lessons have been learnt about human nature and the present. History has revealed the flaws and primitive nature of people irrespective of the mistaken belief that progress has led to civilisation and order. Past conflicts teach that individuals, communities and even nations do not learn from past mistakes but continue to repeat them and that despite eventually being resolved, the effects have the ability to linger and haunt subsequent generations. History also teaches that conflict invariably occurs when people or nations act for self-interest and personal gain, or and when uncompromising authorities exploit their absolute power over citizens to ensure their authority remains unquestioned. Also by understanding the causes of past conflicts, individuals may reflect on their own behaviours and hopefully prevent them from occurring in the present, or if they do, provide a guide as to how to best minimise the damage they cause by knowing how to resolve them quickly and equitably before they spread beyond the main combatants which they invariably do.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Violence has been affiliated with governments and nations since the beginning of political history and plays a huge role in the causes of Wars around the world. What causes leaders to declare war? Many philosophers have based their studies and theories on this question; many have different perspectives. One philosopher, John Stoessinger, has expressed his theories on the causes of war through what he calls his “misperception framework.” Stoessinger shows great interests in the personalities of world leaders; he is less impressed with the roles of abstract forces such as nationalism, militarism, economic factors, or alliance systems as the causes of war. He views misperception as the sing most important precipitating factor in the outbreak of war. His framework is based on four parts which describe the environmental and psychological factors that leaders reflect on throughout their campaign. First off a leader’s image of themselves; there is a extraordinary consistency in the self images of most national leaders on the brink of war. Every leader confidently expects a victory after a brief and triumphant campaign were this common belief in a short decisive war is usually the overflow from a reservoir of self-delusions held by the leadership about both itself and the nation. Second a leader’s view of the character their enemy portrays. Distorted views of the adversary’s character will help precipitate a conflict. Third is based on a leader’s view of their adversary’s intentions toward their self. When a leader on the brink of war believes that their adversary will attack shows a high percentage of the start of a conflict. War becomes a virtual certainty when both leaders shore this perception. Lastly when a leader views the adversary’s capabilities and power it is depicted as the most quintessential cause of war. This is not the actual distribution of power that precipitates a…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main causes of war and conflict are land and resources .These are the most common causes because there is so…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The factors leading to war are often complicated and due to a range of issues. Where disputes arise over issues such as territory, sovereignty, resource, or ideology, and if a peaceable resolution fails, is not sought, or is thwarted, war often results.…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why does war happen? War happens when two or more countries have a dispute, between a religious art, terrorism, or a dispute between democracy and dictatorship ….The Iraq War, Operation Iraq Freedom.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays