Preview

Walter Jan Shlictmann Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Walter Jan Shlictmann Case
In the film A Civil Action, Jan Schlictmann is the plaintiff representing the eight families of the children who died of leukemia, which the families suspect to be caused by chemical contamination of the water in Woburn, Massachusetts. Anne Anderson spearheads this group of families and is the spokesperson for the group. Schlictmann initially does not want to take the case, arguing that the only reason the case may be successful in court is if the court sees a theatrical value in the dead children. [1] However, after being informed that the defendants are Beatrice Foods and W.R. Grace, both wealthy companies with astronomical assets, Schlictmann takes the case. The defendants are William Cheeseman and Jerome Facher, who represent Grace and …show more content…
Skinner decides that it would be a bad thing for the case if the families took the stand, as it would just make it drag on longer, and eventually says that they will decide this portion of the case based on the geological evidence. At this point, Facher offers Schlictmann 20 million, which Schlictmann turns down. The jury deems Beatrice innocent and Facher packs up and leaves. However, the case continues against W.R. Grace, and at this point, the law firm only has a few chairs and their phones, with no furniture anymore. Later, Grace offers them 8 million, and Schlictmann wants more, but ultimately accepts after a verbal berating by Gordon. When it’s all said and done, each family got 325 thousand dollars, which disappoints the families. Ultimately, the law firm attempts to justify why the money isn’t that much, but Anne Anderson replies by saying “How can you even begin to compare what you've lost, to what we've lost.” [1] Finally, Schlictmann, now more or less broke, sends the appeals case with additional incriminating evidence to the EPA, who ultimately win the appeals in court, and makes the companies undertake the 69.4 million cleanup project, the largest cleanup project up to that point in history.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Schonberger Case

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "The HyGain-Telex plan in Lincoln, Nebraska, manufactures antennas. It currently has an U.S. Army contract for Model X32 antennas. The contract requires a production rate of two hundred Model X32s per day. The contract quantity may be changed quarterly."…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hugo H. Hanson Case

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. is a certified public accounting firm that is located in Weaverville, North Carolina. Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. carries out small business specific services such as QuickBooks desktop and online training and installation and support, payroll services, bookkeeping, corporate and LLC tax returns, and financial advice. This certified public accounting firm offers tax services such as individual taxes for all 50 states and multiple state returns, business taxes for corporations, S- corporations, LLCs in all states, non-profit returns – 990s, trust returns – 1041s, as well as tax planning and advice. Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. strives to guarantee friendly and efficient service. Hugo H. Hanson, II CPA P.C. provides…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carl Robins Case

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A number of underlying problems rose to the surface when Carl Robins faced his current situation. Procedures that either were in place but not followed or never defined require attention to avoid this problem in the future. The problems span over several departments. The lack of communication between the parties involved is the main problem. New hires need to know what paperwork is required and when the paperwork is due. Monica Carrolls needs to know about any problems that surface that have to do with the current hiring process. The human resource department must make sure that adequate materials are available and up-to-date. The various departments must put forth a concentrated effort in order to handle this situation.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    2003: Lilly Ledbetter sued her employer, and the federal jury awarded her $3.8 million in damages, which was later reduced by $3.5 million by a judge.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Candidate Skarzynski demonstrated an understanding of the five paragraph order by displaying confidence while briefing his order. SNC covered all the paragraphs with clear and concise instructions. He gave a detailed scheme of maneuver and tasking statement to his fire team. SNC failed to maintain tactical awareness by not post security at the beginning of the mission. As the team began their mission SNC realized his initial plan was not going to work. With the ability to remain calm during friction points it allowed SNC to clearly communicate his new plan to his team. Once the team began the new plan SNC reminded the team to keep their focus and move with a sense of urgency and time was of the essence. SNC was able to maintain his composure…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Civil Action is a gloomy film featuring a lawsuit versus two companies, W. R. Grace and Company and Beatrice Foods, for dumping various chemicals into Woburn's water system. A number of youthful lives were ended due to this incident, leaving their families to grieve. This case eventually begins to bankrupt the attorneys involved, including Jan Schlichtmann, who directly represents the plaintiffs. [1] Soon after declaring war against these companies, Schlichtmann discovers, through a witness, that barrels of chemicals have been dumped into the city's water by employees of the accused companies. [1] However, this proves to be exponentially expensive for Schlichtmann and his team to prove, causing them to fall into bankruptcy. This outcome is…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay, I will focus on the sentence and police officers’ decision in the Paul Bernanrdo and Karla Hamolka case, both known as “The Ken and Barbie Killers”. Since I am finishing my last year in Social Sciences profile Law, Society and Justice, I am interested to work on a famous Canadian trial that affected the whole Canadian population and even the United States. The decision made by police officers was controversial and brought many debates, thus I will analyze this decision under two ethical theories and determine whether they were right or wrong. For my analysis, I will use the Utilitarianism Ethics and Kantian Ethics. These two theories of ethics have different goals and understanding of rightful and wrongful actions.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The civil action proceeding is the legal proceeding in which an individual, and not the state, files a law suit because they have been harmed. The law suit is generally filed in the district court that has jurisdiction over the complaint and the plaintiff seeks equitable resolution (Yesilevch 2013). In the US, civil law makes up the largest number of cases in our legal system. An action in civil court begins when a lawsuit is filed against someone whom is believed to have wronged another individual. These courts are designed to resolve disputes between individuals with whom are believed to have been hurt physically or financially by each other and a legal remedy is pursued (Scott 2014). The burden of proof in a civil action is to prove the case beyond a preponderance of the evidence, which means your case must be believed over the other party’s case. This burden of proof is a lot less than the burden of proof needed in a criminal case therefore civil cases have been won against defendants that were proven not guilty in the criminal court of law. Just as the case of OJ Simpson, Brent was found not guilty in the Alexandria criminal court proceeding but was found liable to Katelyn in the wrongful death lawsuit that Katelyn filed with the Alexandria district court. Katelyn was able to file a wrongful death lawsuit against Brent because he caused the death of her husband, Greg. The evidence was brought before a jury in the district courts and the jury believed Katelyn over Brent and found that Brent was to pay a monetary judgment to Katelyn. Unlike in the criminal case, Brent was never in danger of facing any jail time because the most common remedy that is given in a civil case is that of monetary…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Civil Action written by Jonathan Harr is the theatrical story telling of drama, emotion, truth, manipulation and twist and turn. Justice system is closely monitored in this book with the help of court case and lawsuit. A Civil Action tries to unfold the story of corporate power and how it affects the average American families of Woburn who fought for their justice. In the book, A Civil Action, the author, Jonathan Harr, portrays the dark side of our justice system. It's one of the best works of Jonathan Harr. He portrays the true story of Woburn families who files the lawsuit against two big companies Beatrice Foods and W.R Grace but because of their corporate power, truth gets manipulated and the lawsuit became lengthy. The book portrays the power of money and how justice is taken for granted by the powerful people of the society.…

    • 2383 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Jan Luedecke

    • 2467 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Imagine waking up and having no idea where you are, no idea what you did and no idea how you got there. That was the case for Jan Luedecke, a Canadian man who was accused of raping a young woman at a party. Jan had been drinking a heavy amount of alcohol while at the party and he passed out on a couch. The next thing he remembers is waking up on the floor. Upon further review, it was found that Luedecke had been suffering from parasomnia.…

    • 2467 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McDonald's was contacted by the plaintiff, who wanted to settle out of court. McDonald's who had experienced the same type of case 700 times before, with the exception that this was a 79 year old lady. The fact that McDonald's had evaded justice so many times added to their confidence, but the age of the plaintiff and the circumstances of the incident also mislead them to think that a jury would be on their side. The fact that Mrs. Liebeck was 79 at the time was something McDonald's used to assume that her age had a role in the extent of her injuries. The fact that she was in a vehicle helped them assumed that she was driving at the time of the accident. Unlike like McDonald's, Mrs. Liebeck knew she had a case and proceeded to file in court when her offer was rejected.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hot Coffee

    • 766 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During trial McDonalds was exposed of over seven hundred similar claims prior to this lawsuit. The jury assigned 20% fault to Mrs. Liebeck for spilling the coffee and assigned an 80% fault to McDonalds because there previous history with people being injured for similar incidents. The jury decided to award Mrs. Liebeck two days’ worth of McDonalds coffee sales, which was $160,000 dollars and was awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages, but was later reduced to $480,000 dollars. Punitive damages are damages used to change the behavior of the wrong doer. The case created huge media buzz because the public thought the act was intentional and the Liebeck family was taking extreme measures by filing a lawsuit. This case is used in the film to illustrate how big corporations used the case as a catalyst for tort reform. Tort reform is a perplexing political issue. Modification in tort impose civil penalty to reduce the amount of money that an injured party can receive in tort litigation cases and restrict consumers to take cases to court. The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) is a group of businesses and colleges/universities such as Boeing, Caterpillar, Coca Cola etc. and their goal is to…

    • 766 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Erin Brockovich

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the film Erin Brockovich, a poor single-mother, Erin, begs for a job as a secretary. When she gets interested in a family's medical problems, she uncovers a huge cover-up from a company who knowingly contaminated the town's water. As she digs deeper, Erin finds herself leading her law firm in one of the biggest class action lawsuits in American history.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punitive Damages

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1992, Stella Liebeck, a 72-year-old woman, went through her local McDonald’s drive-thru to get a cup of coffee. The coffee spilled on her lap, resulting in third-degree burns on her thighs. Her injuries caused her to sue McDonald’s. In the beginning, she offered to settle the case for $20,000, which would have covered her medical expenses and her lost income. McDonald’s, however, never offered any more than $800. The case went to trial. The jury found Liebeck partially-liable, which reduced her compensation that she would receive. But because McDonald’s had not been willing to correct their policy about their coffee temperature, even after hundreds of other injuries before this, the judge awarded Liebeck $2.7 million dollars. I agree with the ending of this case. I do see how Liebeck was at fault; she shouldn’t have had the coffee anywhere near her body while trying to open the lid. But had McDonald’s just changed their policy and changed the temperature of the coffee, Liebeck wouldn’t have been burned as badly as she had…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hank Kolb Case

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The company Hank Kolb works in is a big plant with 1200 people working in it. Greasex, which is a specialized degreasing solvent packed in a spray can, is one of the major products of this company. Hank Kolb was hired as a director of quality assurance. A problem occurred with the new filling equipment in the previous week and some of the cans were pressurized beyond the upper specification limit.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays