Preview

Wal-Mart Legal Compliance and Job Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wal-Mart Legal Compliance and Job Analysis
Running head: WAL-MART Legal Compliance and Job Analysis Paper

Wal-Mart Legal Compliance and Job Analysis

BUS530- Human Resource Management [ July 17, 2011 ]

The Title VII lawsuit by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) was a justified result of sexual harassment and mismanagement by Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart could have taken several steps within Human Resource (HR) policy to help deal with this incident, prevent further incidents, and ensure the defendant was properly employed in a safe environment [ (EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2003) ]. Hostile Environment Wal-Mart failed to prevent a hostile work environment for the defendant of the EEOC case in that the Bakery Manager’s actions prevented her from performing her duties without fear of his sexual advances. Wal-Mart’s failed Human Resource strategy in this case to simply remove her from the position was not enough to solve the problem. Wal-mart failed to reprimand the Bakery Manager, failed to re-enforce or set in place written standards to prevent future abuses, failed to document the occurrences and failed the defendant in providing another comparable form of position [ (EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2003) ]. Wal-Mart should review their HR documentation covering harassment, correct any policy issues that need to be addressed, establish a posted, open policy with mandatory reviews by all employees at least once per year, and create and encourage easy access for reporting cases to HR for review without fear of reprisal and investigate ways to prevent opportunities for this type of behavior to occur. Some solutions to consider are to ensure that there are always three or more employees on the job at the same time where no two employees are alone to ensure the behavior is preventable or witnessed for proper recourse. Employees can also attend company sponsored computer based, video or live conferences on harassment, and other work place HR related seminars to encourage training and



References: EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 5:02-CV-206 (E.D. Tex. September 11, 2003). Retrieved from http://www.employertraining.com/settlements/ Stewart, G. L., & Brown, K. G. (2009). Human Resource Management (Custom Edition ed.). Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is an agency of the Federal Government created to handle all types of employment discrimination and to ensure that equal opportunity is given to employees. In the case of EEOC vs Waffle House, I was glad to see that the EEOC’s stepped in and file a suit against Waffle House for violating the ADA. I feel that it was very unfair that Baker was terminated due to he had a seizure at work, but I was happy to see that the EEOC trumped the arbitration at the end.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal and state governments have enacted laws to protect against discrimination and sexual harassment in the work place yet employers continue to discriminate and violate employee 's right to work in a non-hostile environment. We have chosen Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Company to examine class action status, discrimination and sexual harassment in the work place. This was the case first sexual harassment lawsuit to receive class action certification in 1988 defining the class “to include: all women who have applied for, or have been employed, in hourly positions...at any time since December 30, 1983” (U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 1997).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Act protects individuals from unfair labor practices such as discrimination with regards to race, sex, or religion. In addition to prohibiting employment discrimination Title VII also prohibits harassment and a hostile work environment. It was the violation of Title VII with regards to sexual harassment that facilitated the legal action of Beth Ann Faragher against her employer the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. Because of the civil rights act, Faragher was able to take the city to court and share what happened to her. Unfortunately all your able to do is take people like this to court and hope for the best. But the city of Boca Raton feels that they did nothing wrong because they 're not the ones who did the offense but they are the ones who re wrote the law in that department.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Dear Mr. Moore, After reviewing this case, I can state that Teddy’s Supplies is definitely liable for the workplace and sexual harassment against Virginia Pollard. According to the facts, it’s indicated that Ms. Pollard (plaintiff) was placed in a ‘hostile’ environment and Mr. Steve King was her supervisor. Although it is not illegal for 1 woman to work with a group of men, it should be carefully determined by the employer if the environment is suitable for males and females to work together. In this case, it was not a good idea for 1 woman to work with male associates. • Workplace environment can by justified by 7 ways: race, gender, national origin, religious, color, age and disability. In this case, Pollard was constantly being harassed by her male colleagues. They played pranks on her by locking her drawers shut, filling the guard shack with trash, locking her out of the guard shack and therefore she was not able to perform her job duty since she was responsible for watching warehouse inventory. Also, Ms. Pollard was put into unnecessary risk of harm when a coworker backed a forklift up to the guard shack and it backfire into her ear. Ms. Pollard could have sustained injuries if the forklift had hit her because it weighted 3 tons and it could have easily injured her eardrums because it is very loud.…

    • 2218 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    EEOC Presentation Paper

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the United States history, there has been a large amount of discrimination in the workplace and no laws to protect employees. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. If an employee feels they have been a victim of employment discrimination they can file a charge or claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Contributors, 2014). EEOC strives to protect employees that are not treated fairly by other employees or companies. After a complaint has been filed with EEOC, they will handle all the claims by following common procedures and follow all rules and regulations to ensure all cases are handled the same.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wal-Mart Ethical Issue Paper

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages

    “Now, two weeks after filing a complaint against a more senior executive, the 50-year-old mother of two finds herself looking for another job”. The article states that, “Chalace did not know for a fact that Wal-Mart executive was doing anything wrong”. “Wal-Mart says Lowry is simply confused. The company says she mistook a deferred compensation form for an options exercise request and that Williams did nothing wrong. "The Ethics Office determined the same day the complaint was filed that the document that created Ms. Lowry’s [sic] concerns had nothing to do with stock trading and that there was no violation of Wal-Mart's ethics policy," said David Tovar, a Wal-Mart spokesman, in a statement”. Soon after Lowry filed the complaint, her identity was disclosed to Williams. Wal-Mart says Lowry agreed to…

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in which the retailer was charged with failing to accommodate a…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 575

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    United States Department of Labor – Compliance Assistance - Wages and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will outline a complaint process and illustrate the civil litigation that could follow if the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, through mediation and arbitration cannot resolve a charge. The complaint is based on a scenario of an employee, named John. John works for a private sector business and he wishes to lodge a complaint of discrimination against the company he works for. This paper will explain the steps that are taken, from the beginning with the (EEOC), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The paper will continue explaining the process by illustrating the civil litigation steps from the state level to the highest level of the United States Supreme Courts.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appropriate outcome of this case would be that Walmart violated the right for equal pay and equal promotion due to the way it conducted the promotions and defined payment for its employees. The company as is evident in the plaintiff complaints have been discriminating against women both regarding promotions and payment, violating The Equal Pay Act of 1963, equal employment opportunity act 1963 and the Civil Act of 1964, (Diversity and Managing Diversity,…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment Law Compliance

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) is a well-known and widely used federal anti-discrimination law (LaMance, n.d.). Title VII make it illegal for employers to discriminate against someone based on their race, religion, national origin or sex (U.S. EEOC, 2014). The Act also made it illegal for employers to retaliate against a person who files a complaint of discrimination or participates in a discrimination investigation (U.S. EEOC, 2014). An employer who violates Title VII may find themselves subjected to a number of legal consequences such as having to pay large sums for damages and being required to readjust the company’s policies (LaMance, n.d.). To avoid violating Title VII Mr. Stonefield and his managers should treat all employees and applicants equally without regard to any characteristics except job performance (HR Specialist, 2013).…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Epstein, R. A. (1992). Forbidden grounds: The case against employment discrimination laws. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The commitment of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is to ensure persons are not being discriminated or categorized under Title legislation VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (U.S. Equal employment Opportunity Commission, 2000). The Commissions responsibility is to justify and put into action provisions of legislation VII against criminal occupation practices. The EEOC is also in control of managing Federal legislations that make it illegal to discriminate against those because of disability, gender, race, color or ethnic background (U.S. Equal employment Opportunity Commission, 2000). Overall, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sets an example reprimanding those who illegally act on workplace discrimination and harassment.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) is one the result of the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, also known as Title VII. The primary purpose of the EEOC is to provide employees and prospective employees with a legal recourse to ensure fair and equal consideration with respect to employment and termination. Among other things, the law prohibits employers from basing the hiring or firing of an individual on factors such as race, age, religion, national origin, color or sex. When an individual feels that his rights under Title VII have been violated, he may file a claim against the company. The following paragraphs will outline the claims process of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission and also the civil litigation process from the State level to the Supreme Court.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays