Wal-American Case Summary

Noble motives cannot justify a policy that consistently fails to deliver what it promises or that creates greater long-term problems than it solves Walter A. McDougall

Currently it is to easy for corporations to find loopholes in corporate laws that are Set in place to try and protect people and other companys from the immoral actions of these corporations

Solution! Affirm

now before we continue I must provide the following resolution all analysis of this resolution

1. as the affirmative i must prove that the actions of corporations ought to be, held, to the same moral standards as the actions of individuals

2.My second point is that the negative either must say that one corporation must not be held to moral standards
and throughout my case I will refer to corporations as such

since this is the case I will prove that corporations, because they are acting as individuals and claim these rights, have legally entered into the social contract we all entered when we were born, so to elaborate on this I will use John Locke's Theory of the Social Contract to help you understand why equality is parmount in this round and how it very much applies to this topic I will do so in three main arguments, 1st a corporations entrance into the social contract, 2Nd application of the social contract to the corporations, and finally as individuals in the social contract.

contention one

I: a corporations entrance into the social
corporations that are not moral and do not follow any ethics of business are trying to control us and our trade, that is why we set up a government to protect from acts like that. thus entering us into as what john Locke calls the state of war with the corporation. this is the simplest reason why they should be held to the same moral standards as those of