Preview

Violation Of Criminal Evidence

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1409 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violation Of Criminal Evidence
Carla Belisario
Criminal Evidence
09/15/12

Defending the client and making sure that this case is dismissed would be a great outcome to this case. However, in order to do this we must make sure that the evidence does not enter the court room. The first point that we will acknowledge in this case is that in order for the evidence to not be admitted into court is by filing a “Motion to Suppress” the evidence presented by the prosecution. A motion to suppress is a motion that is usually filed on behalf of the defense to prevent evidence into a trial ((n.d.). Legal Dictionary). In this case a motion could be filed to suppress the evidence because in this case the evidence at question was obtained in violation of
…show more content…
Assuming that the defendant has standing and the right to privacy, if the evidence was obtained illegally then the case should be dismissed because it is all fruits of the poisonous tree. There is a big possibility that the case may be dismissed. If all the evidence was obtained illegally then the prosecuting attorney has no evidence against my client. If there is no physical evidence and no case then the case will most likely be dismissed. The prosecution could try to argue that eventually they would have found the evidence legally and it was an inevitable discovery. “The inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule allows into evidence illegally seized items that would have been discovered lawfully anyway. This exception allows evidence to be admitted, even though it was seized in violation of the Constitution. (Inevitable Discovery Exception Law & Legal Definition. (n.d.)” However then they would have to prove how they would have found it. Depending on the constitutional violation, the scenario can …show more content…
There is usually further evidence such as witnesses that still make for a good case. For example in the O.J Simpson case, the fact that the evidence was contaminated made for the dismissal of that evidence. In the long run the case wasn’t strong enough against Mr. Simpson and the charges were reduced. Although we could fight for the dismissal of enough evidence to win the case, in a perfect world we would have the case dismissed. Although, this was just an example, because these two cases differ very much, their similarities are that evidence is being dismissed enough to win a trial. Our mission is to get enough evidences suppressed or dismissed to be able to efficiently defend the client at hand. if this is successfully done, the case can be won and the rights of the citizens remain protected. These laws are made to prevent police misconduct. They were made so that police officers would make sure to do their job and protect the citizens, including their rights. If a person is guilty of a crime then there is ample time to gather evidence correctly and follow protocol. Although it is important to seek justice, the Constitution is what we as Unites States Citizens live by, if we cannot protect those rights that we works so hard for, then we have nothing left to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People v. Sisuphan

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment right to present defense and “all pertinent evidence of significant value to that defense” was not violated because the “return of the property is not a defense to embezzlement. Fraudulent intent is an essential element of embezzlement. Although restoration of the property is not a defense, evidence of repayment may be relevant to the extent it shows that a defendant’s intent at the time of the taking was not fraudulent.”…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, and indictment dismissed.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yunker V. Honeywell

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. The court allowed for the negligent retention issue to go to trial because of some evidence found on the record, which showed a number of…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contraband have been a huge issue for most correctional facilities across the United States and overseas. Contraband is typically defined as a criminal threat among the correctional staff, and other inmates. Contraband can be tobacco products, money, personal items, and unauthorized food. Most of these items are coming from close family members or friends. In order to control the possibility of trafficking contraband item is to use a full body x-ray to keep to help detect from any contraband from entering any correctional facilities. With the body scan it can also detect the use of contraband that’s inside the prison. Contraband is the reason why it so many strict rules in most correctional facilities today. The more contraband that can be…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another issue is the indictment of police officers. Some local prosecutors protect law enforcement, rather than justly punishing them for their foul actions. In an attempt to solve this problem, some states have appointed permanent special prosecutors’ offices whose job is to investigate the misconduct of police officers.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non Testimonial Evidence

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The principle based on federal Constitutional Law that evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Evidence

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement; that is, rights are the fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people. There are many types of rights in our society. In addition to the Constitution, court decisions and statutes are important sources of rights, and so are state constitutions. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure sometimes shed light on and clarify important rulings handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, the Federal Rules set forth the criminal procedure guidelines that federal criminal justice practitioners are required to abide by.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Procedures

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We are taught that the courts and the Supreme Courts, in particular, are charged with interpreting the Constitution and the laws of the Unites States. We are further taught that the law enforcement should accept such interpertations uncritically and without hesitation. Theory and reality differ for at least four reasons, the Supreme Court sometimes makes decisions on excruciantingly detailed matters that have almost no appliciablility to most law enforcement officers most of the time. The…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    guilty. Evidence and DNA is all part of the investigation that leads to an arrest. Once evidence is…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule prevents evidence obtained by the criminal justice system in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable search or seizure is not allowable to prove the guilt of an accused person in a criminal prosecution. However, the primary purpose of the rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the gathering of evidence in violation of the Fourth Amendment (Del Carmen, 2010). The rule also strengthens the protections offered by the Fourth Amendment by allowing defendants a means to object to illegally obtained evidence. The rule originally applied to federal courts only. However, the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Mapp v. Ohio (1961) incorporated the inclusion of state courts for using the exclusionary rule from the Fourteenth Amendment to include the protections of the Fourth Amendment thereby requiring the state courts to provide the protections of the Bill of Rights to defendants. This…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should we allow legal limitations on Police Investigations? According to historic belief, we as people do not want to give police absolute power to pursue investigations and prosecutions. This poses a threat to constitutional rights and values of individual liberty, privacy, and due process. Although crime control is an important policy, law enforcement personnel must still protect individual rights. Law enforcement officers must protect citizens from crime and punish wrongdoers. The court has strict defined rules for circumstances that deal with officers’ legal limitations. Legal limitations are so strict that if evidence is obtained illegally, such as improper interrogations, the offences may be dismissed; a person may go free despite the fact that the evidence clearly proves his or her guilt (exclusionary rule.)…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    prove to be a useless exercise. Thus, her motion must be accompanied by a statement of the evidence which she intends to present if the motion is granted and which is such as to warrant a reasonable belief that the result of the case would probably be otherwise if a new trial is granted. (Emphasis and underscoring ours.)…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics