Preview

Vernonia School District V. Acton

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vernonia School District V. Acton
On June 26, 1995, the Supreme Court decided on the case Vernonia School District v. Acton as to whether or not random drug testing of high school athletes violated the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment. During the 1980 's and 1990 's there was a large increase in drug use. The courts decision was a strong interpretation of the Fourth Amendment and the right decision upon drug testing high school athletes. Between 1985 and 1989 the Vernonia School District began to see a marked increase in disciplinary problems, drug use by students, athletic injuries, use of drugs by athletes and a student body preoccupation with the drug culture. The school district adopted a policy requiring students who participated in interscholastic athletics to sign a consent of both routine and random drug testing. In the fall of 1991, respondent James Acton, then a seventh-grader, signed up to play football at one of the District 's grade schools. He was denied participation because he and his parents refused to sign the testing consent forms. The Actons filled suit on the grounds that it violated the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The federal district court ruled in the school district 's favor, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, stating that although the district had laid the foundation for a drug policy, the interest was not so compelling as to justify a random testing program. The time between the 1980 's and 1990 's America saw a dramatic increase in drug use which spread through nearly every community in the nation. Drugs had not previously been a major problem in Vernonia schools. In the mid-to-late 1980 's, however, teachers and administrators observed an increase in drug use. Students began to speak out about their attraction to the drug culture, and boasted that there was nothing the school could do about it. The Supreme Court had to decide on the question of, does random


Bibliography: 1. Goldman, Jerry. "Vernonia School District V. Acton 515 U.S. 646 (1995)." Oyez. 20 Oct. 2006 . 2. Gwendolyn, Gregory H. "Vernonia School District 47J V. Acton (U.S. Sup. Ct.)." National School Boards Association. 2002. National School Boards Association. 23 Oct. 2006 . 3. "Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J V. Acton (94-590), 515 U.S. 646 (1995)." Legal Information Institute. 23 Oct. 2006 . 4. "U.S. Supreme Court: VERNONIA SCHOOL DIST. 47J V. ACTON, U.S. (1995)." Findlaw. A Thomson Business. 23 Oct. 2006 . 5. Kezirian, Richard. American History: Major Controversies Reviewed. Third ed. Kendall/Hunt Company, 1991. 254.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Safford Arizona school on October 8th, officials strip-searched a 13-year-old girl after they received information from another student that the girl possessed "prescription strength" 400 mg ibuprofen and 200mg naproxen. While attending math, assistant principle Kerry Wilson entered the classroom and instructed Savanna Redding's to his office. Upon entering, she immediately noticed her planner placed on his desk. However, what she didn't recognize was the knife, cigarette and lighter that was contained inside it. Admitting the planner was hers, she explained to the assistant principle that she had lent the planner prior to her classmate, Marissa and had NO knowledge of what was inside it. Also brought to her attention was a large white bottle of ibuprofen that was also found in the planner. Unsatisfied, the assistant principle asked to also search the rest of her belongings in order to disprove her claim. When no evidence was found, he proceeded to send her to the school's nurses office for what can be considered a strip-search. She was told to remove a clothing and in the processes her private areas (breast) were exposed. Complete embarrassed, she remained calm and did as she was told. No pills, or any other illegal item was found on her. Naturally, when Savanna 's mom discovered this she "dropped the bomb" and filed a lawsuit saying it violated her daughter's fourth amendment right (which was the right thing to do)and that she was never contacted during the search at anytime. Proceeding to the trial, the District court found no violation and a panel agreed, but on the appeal in a "en banc decision 6-5" the court reversed the other decision saying that it DID in fact violate her fourth amendment right. School district appealed to the Supreme Court and approved there appeal and granted certiorari. It was reasoned that the strip search was not justified nor was the scope of intrusion reasonably…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cornell University Law School. (n.d.). Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education. Retrieved 11 19, 2011, from Legal Information Institute: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0476_0267_ZS.html…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    At times in schools, there could be disagreements and disputes between the decisions of government and the rights of individuals. Students attend school in order to become well-educated young adults. The schoolteacher’s main objective is to make sure that students are receiving the maximum amount of learning to prepare them for future endeavors. Schools educate students on citizenship and what it means to live in a democracy. Public schools are under the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, which gives citizens protection of their individual liberties from governmental interference. Public school officials must obey the demands of the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in the 1943 case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brown v. Board of Educ., No. 1, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 347 U.S. 483; 74 S. Ct. 686; 98 L. Ed. 873; 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2094; 53 Ohio Op. 326; 38 A.L.R.2d 1180, December 9, 1952, Argued, May 17, 1954, Decided, Reargued December 8, 1953. University of Hartford Library Database…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1974 The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Lau vs. Nichols case set major precedent regarding the educational rights of language minorities, although this fact is grounded in statute (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964), rather than in the U.S. Constitution. At issue was whether school administrators may meet their obligation to provide equal educational opportunities merely by treating all students the same, or whether they must offer special help for students unable to understand English. Lower federal courts had absolved the San Francisco school district of any responsibility for minority children 's "language deficiency." But a unanimous Supreme Court disagreed. Its ruling opened a new era in federal civil rights enforcement under the so-called "Lau Remedies." The decision was delivered by Justice William O. Douglas on January 21, 1974 (Find Law, 2006).…

    • 1576 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Crow

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brown vs. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was one of the most important decisions made by the US Supreme Court. This ruling on May 17, 1954 overturned Plessy vs. Ferguson. This court case ruled that the segregation of public schools was unconstitutional. Van Woodward writes in this book “The court’s decision of 17 May was the momentous and far reaching for the century in civil rights. It reversed a constitutional trend started long before Plessy vs. Ferguson and it marked the beginning of the end of Jim Crowe” (Van Woodward, 147).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brown vs. Board of Education

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)." Columbus Encyclopedia 6th Edition. ©2005. Infoplease. 25 October 2005…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There have been many misconceptions and controversies about drug testing in public high schools. On one hand, it has made students believe their privacy is being violated with random drug testing. But on the other hand, it has also helped teenagers who have a serious drug problem to go into rehab to give them another chance at life. Drug testing should be allowed at school because it discovers the real abusers before it’s too late, the result of the test will remain private, and drug testing in public schools is legal to do.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court recently ruled that random drug testing is constitutional for students who participate in sports or any extracurricular activities. I do not think the Supreme Court should make random drug tests constitutional. Making students take drug tests is just another way for the Supreme Court to dig their claws in peoples’ everyday lives. When you take a drug test you are submitting yourself to be judged. If you refuse, people will assume you are doing drugs, if you take it, you are trying to prove your innocence. The law is assuming everyone is guilty of using drugs, by having random drug tests. I believe you should not punish the innocent with the guilty.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    School Busing

    • 3079 Words
    • 13 Pages

    3.Bruce Allen Murphy. Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka. World Book Online Americas Edition. Http://www.aolsvc.worldbook.aol.com/wbpage/na/ar/co/079300. November 17, 2001.…

    • 3079 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug testing should not be mandatory for public school student athletes. Such mandatory tests in the public setting violate the students right to privacy. Students may feel very uncomfortable submitting a test that is very personal of themselves. Why should they submit such a test when they haven’t done anything wrong from the beginning?…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A small number of public schools had been testing students for drugs as early as the late 1900s. In 1985 the united states supreme court held in the case new jersey vs T.L.O that unlike law enforcement authorities, schools were not required to have probable cause it to secure a warrant in order to carry out searches to students property when common sense indicated that there was cause for suspicion.” It talk about the court disease making drug testing logical without probable cause.’…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Memorandum

    • 2780 Words
    • 12 Pages

    2. Public school officials are in violation of Washington State law but are not in violation of Federal law by conducting random drug tests on students who participate in athletic programs.…

    • 2780 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Summary of Debra P.v. Turlington - May 4, 1983 Ruling.” Florida Department of Education. Florida Department of Education, 2005. Web. 3 Nov. 2012.…

    • 2347 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One side of the argument is clearly said: Drug testing infringes and violates the rights of students. “The first large-scale national study on student drug testing found no difference in rates of drug use between schools that have drug testing programs and those that do not.” (Students’ Rights, 2005). Another side to the argument says that drug…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays