Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Utilitarianism

Good Essays
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism:
“Actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” John Stuart Mill utilitarianism, 1863
Utilitarians founder Jeremy Bentham has a famous formulation that is know as the “greatest-happiness principle”. The definition of this is “the ethical principle that an action is right in so far as it promotes the greatest happiness of the greatest number of those affected”.

Central Beliefs:
There are seven thoughts guiding them.
These are
1. They want to think about the future
2. They want to leave the part of land they live on the same or even better than before
3. They want a better world where everyone is happy and think if themselves on how to make themselves happy and also how to make other people happy
4. They want right and wrong to be a bit easier. They do not want list to rule their lives. They say that if the Ten Commandments should only be obeyed if it increases their happiness and if they don’t they will not obey them
5. They do not want to talk to much about whether certain prefences are better than others eg. Opera vs. mud wrestling, or homosexuality vs. heterosexuality.
6. They will think of their own happiness, but other people’s happiness counts greatly. They would sacrifice their own happiness if they have to make someone else happy.
7. Do not limit their thinking to human ‘people’. Seek for a happier world where the satisfied preferences of humans and animals are maximised.

“Utilitarianism is a way of facing moral issues without God” Gene Edward Veith, JNR.
“Universal happiness keeps the wheels steadily turning; truth and beauty can’t” Aldous Huxley

Objections that has being raised. Which have Christian roots

1. Utilitarianism can be unjust
2. Can be irresponsible
3. Can miscalculate
4. Can become shortsighted
5. Can lose their ‘integrity’
6. Can be self-deceiving
7. Consequentialism destroys trust
8. Can be cruel and empty

Consequentialism is rejected outright. These limits include such things as:

1. Christian Fellowships must not be damage (1 Corinthians 3:16-17)
2. Certain lifestyles are always wrong (1 Corinthians 6:9-10,18)
3. Sneaky methods of evangelism are unacceptable (2 Corinthians 4:2,6:3)
4. Worship of false gods is never an option (1 Corinthians 10:14; 2 Corinthians 6:16)
5. Truth must never be violated (2 Corinthians 13:8)

‘Utilitarianism is a teleological or consequentialist moral theory, holding that rightness of actions is a function of the consequences, “ the greatest good for the greatest number.”’

There are many types of utilitarianism here are some
1. Hedonistic- “advocating the maximization of pleasure and avoidance of pain.”
2. G.E Moore’s agathistic utilitarianism, ‘promoting but refusing to anyalyze “the good”
3. Eudaimonistic utilitarianism, “maximizing happiness.”
4. Rule utilitarianism “concerns itself with general moral rules that you should follow when making decisions.”
5. Act utilitarianism or Case utilitarianism, “requires each case to be taken individually and appropriate calculations made for each one of them.”
6. Two-level utilitarianism, “Level one is using Rule Utilitarianism (based on our intuitions) because it is efficient (in both time and effect). Level two however is using Act Utilitarianism when a situation requires more thought and more critical reflection.”

Their have a calculus in order to objectively calculate the more moral action in a given situation.

The calculus requires you to calculate and rank the following 7 criteria out of a maximum value
1. Intensity – “how much happiness will result out of the action.”
2. Certainty – “what is the likelihood that the pleasure will actually arise.”
3. Duration – “how long will the pleasure last for.”
4. Purity – “what is the probability that any resulting pain will lead to more pain?”
5. Extent – “how many people will the pleasure affect?”
6. Fecundity – “what is the probability that any resulting pleasure will lead to even more pleasure?”
7. Propinquity – “how far off is the pleasure?”
[6. and 7. were added by later philosophers]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    individuals’ that desire to live a free life, are tolerant of diversity, and aspire to achieve their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism or the greatest happiness principle, is mainly characterized by happiness and consequentialism. The measure of good and evil is balanced between individual 's happiness and the happiness of the community. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013) If you treat others how you wish to be treated, you are acting in the greater good for the most amounts of people, and in doing so, you are acting with morals. To act selfishly, you are acting morally wrong. This theory relies on producing the greatest amount of happiness. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013)…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “ The ‘greatest happiness principle’ holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill p. 7). Actions only hold moral worth if the consequences are favorable on a grand scale. In utilitarianism actions are evaluated, not people which brings about the “agent neutral” concept. Mill stated ‘the utilitarian standard of what is right in conduct is not the agent’s own happiness but that of all concerned…as between his own happiness and that of others, utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a disinterested benevolent spectator.’…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to analyse the ethical decisions made, it is important to assess the patient holistically. It is important to assess the impact that the symptoms may have on the patient’s quality of life. For instance, would amputating her leg immobilise her? Physically, if the patient is to remain not amputated would that increase the risk of infection or would the ulcers worsen? The risk factors should also be assessed, for instance, would amputating impact her social well being by immobilising her. If this were to be the case it would have a direct impact on her emotional and economical wellbeing, because with her unable to mobilize she may have to spend money…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. John Stuart Mill – On Virtue and Happiness (1863)The utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being only desirable as means to that end. What ought to be required of this doctrine, what conditions is it requisite that the doctrine should fulfill, to make good its claim to be believed? The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it; and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it. If the end which the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself were not, in theory and in practice, acknowledged to be an end, nothing could ever convince any person that it was so. No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness. This, however, being a fact, we have not only all the proof which the case admits of, but all which it is possible to require, that happiness is a good, that each persons happiness is a good to that person, and the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons. Happiness has made out its title as one of the ends of conduct, and consequently one of the criteria of morality. But it has not, by this alone, proved itself to be the sole criterion. To do that, it would seem, by the same rule, necessary to show; not only that people desire happiness, but those they never desire anything else. Now it is palpable that they do desire things which, in common language, are decidedly distinguished from happiness. They desire, for example, virtue, and the absence of vice, no less really than pleasure and the absence of pain. The desire of virtue is not as universal, but it is as authentic…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethics is an expansive field of normative ethics that believes that the action that you take should be that which maximises utility, that is to say prospering and maximizing happiness whilst mitigating suffering or sadness as much as possible. Whilst it was once often considered a hedonistic field, there being one that argues pleasure being the only true, intrinsic good or aim, it is now more commonly referred to that of a consequentiality field, focussed more on consequentialism. It may be argued then that there is quite a difference between the seemingly 'old Utilitarianism' and that of the new consequentialism.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    utilitarianism

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A utilitarian believes in the action for the good for all people. This would mean that a Utilitarian would agree with the magistrate’s decision on framing the innocent man. The reason behind this agreement is that since the one man being killed is saving lives and saving chaos it makes it ethical, from a utilitarian standpoint. According to utilitarianism one must consider the consequences of a certain action. So in this case the magistrate must weigh the pros and cons of the decision to execute this man. The magistrate must be a utilitarian because he decided to kill the innocent man in an attempt make the majority of people calm. Utilitarian’s also believe in the idea of attaining happiness or pleasure. Therefore making a decision to kill the man the magistrate must believe that it will make everyone happy, making it morally correct in the magistrate’s eyes.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Utilitarianism (from the Latin utilis, useful) is a theory of ethics based on quantitative maximization of some good for society or humanity. It is a form of consequentialism. This good is often happiness or pleasure, though some utilitarian theories might seek to maximize other consequences. Utilitarianism is sometimes summarized as, the greatest happiness for the greatest number." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    utilitarianism

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory that believes that right thing to do comes from a measurement of the amount of pleasure over the amount of pain, and decides that the right thing to do results in what will be the greatest pleasure for the majority of the group. In other words by calculating happiness you will be able to decide what the right thing to do is as long as it is right for the majority of the people. This seems as if it will only help the people that agree on the same things. If the majority always see eye to eye on what is pleasurable and what is painful then it will work in their favor. However, that leaves out the minority that may not agree with what is pleasurable. Utilitarianism seems as though it will stop individual rights, because the only way to conform to utilitarianism is by always agreeing with the majority of the group. While reading this chapter one example came to mind, I brought a dilemma to decide how the majority and minority might see different on a subject. In many people’s eyes eating food out of a dumpster is unacceptable, therefore watching someone perform in this act may be more painful than pleasurable to see. On the other hand there are people who may enjoy eating out of a dumpster with the beliefs that may contain more nutritional value and they only eat the foods that are not spoiled and rotten. These people are the minority to this social issue, however in utilitarianism because the majority of people think that eating of the dumpster is disgusting and morally wrong, they outlaw being able to do such things, which lead to the minority of people who do enjoy eating food from the dumpster in more pain than pleasure. The argument can also be made that the majority is helping the minority increase their pleasure by getting them away from the diseases that are in the dumpster. Likewise, the argument from the minority may be that they are helping the majority not be wasteful by using the foods that are…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory of justice whose highest principle is to maximize happiness and utility: “The basic idea of utilitarianism is simple: the right thing to do is what produces the most good” (Mill, 15). The “most good” can be understood in terms of happiness, or the greater amount of pleasure than of pain. Therefore, utilitarians measure the consequences of actions by how much the results bring happiness to the greatest amount of people. The best alternative to any situation is the one that produces the greatest net utility. According to John Stuart Mill, “”Utility” or the “greatest happiness principle” holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (16). Therefore, whatever produces the most good is considered to be just.…

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    argument is the belief that the only way to measure the moral worth of an…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics