Preview

USEC case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
914 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
USEC case
USEC Case
Case Analysis

In response to the Energy Policy Act of 1992, the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) was created to privatize uranium enrichment for civilian use (Wikipedia). In 1998, USEC went public, and has been operating as a leading global energy supplier of enriched uranium fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. The following report details USEC’s opportunity to embark on a massive capital-expenditure project known as the American Centrifuge Project (ACP). Currently, USEC is utilizing gas-diffusion technology to enrich uranium. 100 million dollars have already been invested with the Department of Energy (DOE) in the development of the ACP technology, and a balance of $1.6 billion would be required to execute the project. While the investment cost is significant, the ACP would provide distinct advantages for USEC. This new technology would allow USEC to leapfrog over the current technology of its competitors, while simultaneously reducing current enrichment costs by 50%. After analyzing the financials of this opportunity, we recommend that USEC proceed with development of the ACP. The following report will detail our specific calculations and conclusions.
As of quarter two 2006, Paducah was producing at its capacity of 3.5M Separative Working Units (SWU’s) annually. The cost to produce 1 SWU in 2006 will be $43.26 (increasing annually with inflation). Our assumption is that USEC will not proceed with the M2M purchase incentive detailed in the case; instead, they will purchase raw uranium as needed at market value. USEC is responsible for $8M annually to the DOE for the lease of the Paducah plant and $30 million is spent annually on capital expenditures; both of which are expected to increase with inflation. Furthermore, depreciation is expected to approximate capital expenditures for the near future.
Paducah will begin to reduce production levels in 2011. Only 1M SWU’s will be produced at Paducah in 2011, and all production will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Xacc 280 Week 2 Mini Case

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * As production only accounts for 50% of production capacity, I will assume no additional capital expenditures in the near future…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Waltham Motors Case

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Using budget data, what was the total expected cost per unit if all manufacturing and…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utiliscan Case Analysis

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Paul, a former Director of Human Resources at the Utiliscan Company conducted an employee survey prior to leaving the organization. Utiliscan Company requested Paul to implement a plan, based on the survey results to address the employee’s concerns and to keep in mind the financial condition of the company. The plan will include changes that need to be made to the current systems, processes, policies, and activities based on survey results.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When 5,000 units are produced variable costs are $35 per unit and total costs are…

    • 1812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Polisar Case

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As shown on the statement of net contribution September 1986, NASA Rubber Division’s actual net sales revenue exceeds the budget by yielding a favorable net sales variance of 4,579,000. NASA also generates a positive gross margin by accurately and reasonably budget the variable costs. NASA calculates standard variable cost per tonne of butyl by multiplying a standard utilization factor by a standard price established for each unit of input. Since feedstock prices varied with worldwide market conditions and represented the largest component of costs, it is impossible to establish standard input prices that remained valid for extended periods. Therefore, the company reset feedstock standard costs each month to a price that reflected market prices. This constant adjustment makes sure the accuracy of the measurement of the variable costs. However, NASA’s actual gross profit is almost 50% below budget because the actual total fixed costs are much higher than the budget; and volume variance would be the key factor resulting in this discrepancy.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Energy Gel Case Summary

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    HPC is deciding on whether or not to launch a new product line. Furthermore, if the company decided to proceed with the project, then the new product, Energy Gel, should be evaluated. The Energy Gel case describes three approaches in order to estimate project costs which are direct cost advocated by Harry Wickler, full cost supported by Mark Leiter, and equipment based costing supported by Frank Nanzen. The direct costing basis only considers the variable costs that are directly identified with the Energy Gel project. However, it ignores many costs or benefits including cannibalization of the existing Energy bar product, use of valuable excess capacity, and the possible increases in the overhead expenses. On the other hand, in full costing basis, Leiter considers the project as a stand-alone entity, which ignores benefits from the use of excess capacity and fixed cost activities. Lastly, the equipment- based costing by Nanzen proposes that Wickler…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Xx Custom Harmon Company

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The equivalent units of production for materials. = 38,000 (See math below) Transferred out= 30,000+ work in process 8,000= 38,000 ii. The cost per equivalent unit for conversion.= $7.50 (see math below) total weighted average units= 8,000 *.3= 24000 plus 30,000 that was transfer= 32,400 Conversion- 48,600 + added during month 194,400= 243,000 cost per unit 243,000/ total weighted avg unit 32,400 = $7.50 per unit iii. The total cost assigned to units transferred out of the Curing Department during November. = Materials= $142,500 (see math below) Conversion= $225,000 Total cost= $367,500 Materials = work in process plus added during month ( 34,500+146,000) = 180500 transferred materials divide by total average unit= 30,000/38,000=.7894 180500*.7894=$142,500 Materials Conversion= materials transferred times cost per equivalent unit 30,000*$7.50= 225,000 Add together for total cost= 225000+142500= 367500 iv. The cost assigned to work in process inventory as of November 30.= Materials $38,000 + conversion $18,000= Total cost $56,000 (See math below) Materials times ending work in process divide total materials= 34500+146000= 180500 180500* (8,000/38,000)= 38,000 Conversion ending work process inventory 8,000*.3=2,400 conversion cost conversion times per unit= 2,400*$7.50= $18,000 Total cost= 38,000+18,000=…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Energy Policy

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages

    Nuclear energy issues facing Congress include federal incentives for new commercial reactors, radioactive waste management policy, research and development priorities, power plant safety and regulation, nuclear weapons proliferation, and security against terrorist attacks. Significant incentives for new commercial reactors were included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58). These include production tax credits, loan guarantees, insurance against regulatory delays, and extension of the Price-Anderson Act nuclear liability system. Together with higher fossil fuel prices and the possibility of greenhouse gas controls, the federal incentives for nuclear power have helped spur renewed interest by utilities and other potential reactor developers. Plans for as many as 31 reactor license applications have been announced, although it is unclear how many of those projects will move forward. In his January 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama called for “building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants” as a key component of his “clean energy” program. Financing for new reactors is widely considered to depend on the loan guarantees authorized by EPACT05 Title XVII, administered by the Department of Energy (DOE). The total amount of loan guarantees to be provided to nuclear power projects has been a continuing congressional issue. Nuclear power plants are currently allocated $18.5 billion in loan guarantees, enough for three or four reactors. President Obama’s FY2011 budget request would nearly triple the loan guarantee ceiling for nuclear power plants, to $54.5 billion. However, opponents of nuclear power contend that the Administration’s proposed increases in nuclear loan guarantees…

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primary Aluminum Demand

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At a minimum market price of $1,416 per ton of aluminum, the Hillside plant can produce annual profits of ~$216 M, beginning in 1997. Discounting these annual profits to their 1994 value, using an 11% cost of capital, the project will be worth undertaking (see details in slide 1), assuming the price of aluminum holds at or above this level.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taubes, Gary. “Whose Nuclear Waste?” Technology Review 105.1 (2002): 60-68. InfoTrac Custom Journals. Web. 2 Dec. 2009.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military insurgents

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    has been a long time concern of the US that if able to develop any type of significant nuclear technology…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The items included in these calculations are the direct costs from Table 3 and the indirect (allocated) costs from Table 4. The first 3 columns of numbers from these graphs correspond to the Table 5 question marks that we are looking for. Included in these calculations are the staff benefits which are 35% of the staff salaries and the staff services which are 30% of the staff salaries.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I original planned to write a paper that answered the question “Should the Department of Defense (DOD) lead the US’s nuclear arsenal modernization efforts by itself or should that responsibility be shared with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)?” I planned to compare DOD and NNSA’s budget requesting process, the actual amounts spent on nuclear modernization among the service branches, the NNSA, and the national laboratories to determine which organization is making more progress with their modernization efforts for similar amounts of money or less. I considered the efficiencies in making nuclear weapon delivery vehicles and the actual nuclear weapons packages…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TOPSIM Report

    • 1289 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the first period the price established for P1M1 was 2500 and the number of sold units was 15000. However, the production costs were greater than the price per unit, respectively 3428 EUR/unit. The board decided to dismiss 100 employees and to invest 1,5 mil EUR in maintenance and 1,5 mil EUR in environment. Moreover, the team decided to make a loan of 25 mil EUR in order to invest it later in production.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays