Preview

Unit 1 Assignment: Common Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unit 1 Assignment: Common Law
Unit 1 Assignment

Common Law Common law is based on the bible, stare decisis and precedent. Basically what this means is that common law is recognized as law even if it is not actually written in the books. For example common law marriage is recognized when a couple lives together for so long even if they do not have an actual marriage license(Miller & Jentz, 2010).
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear a case. For example federal court hears federal laws, where a state court hears states laws and a civil court hears civil cases. State courts would never hear federal issues because of jurisdiction(Miller & Jentz, 2010).
Precedent
The best way that I can think of to describe precedent is that if someone went to prison for stealing now, but a case from the past is brought up where someone committed the same exact crime but did not get a prison term, this case could be brought up as precedent in order to change the prison sentencing(Miller &
…show more content…
Statues laws are also written by private parties. These laws are different from common laws because these laws have actually been written by legislature. I personally love watching the ID discovery channel; I recently watched an episode about Tracy Thurman. Tracy Thurman lived in Connecticut and the police failed to protect her from her husband after he repeatedly broke the no contact order and abused her. Because of this the Thurman Law was enacted in order to make sure domestic abuse victims are protected(Gore, 2011).
Remedy
A legal remedy is the solution to a legal problem. There are different types of remedies for different situations. For example if someone were to sue someone for an accident, then the remedy would be financial compensation. Another example would child support. When a parent files for child support, the court sets a certain amount that must be paid(Miller & Jentz,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CarrieWhite unit6 Seminar

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then you went over jurisdiction of a court refers to those in cases in which it may exercise lawful authority which is determined by statute or constitution. The question that you asked I honestly think that answer would be yes. Then you went over the state court system many differences among state courts which use three tiered structure which are trial courts of limited jurisdiction, trial courts of general jurisdiction,…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Precedents are a past case that is used as an example or as guidance as it has similar facts and circumstances. There are 3 types of Precedents; Original, Binding and Persuasive. They can be used instead of statutory laws in civil cases. They are created when a new case, which has never been trialled in the UK courts. An example of this was the London bombings in 2005. The rulings for this trial will now be applied to future cases, similar to this. Judges look at a previous case, which is similar and in an equal or higher court and they will then use this information to decide…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a court decision that furnishes an example or authority for deciding subsequent case involving identical or similar facts.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An important concept this week is jurisdiction. As the text explains, a court must have subject matter jurisdiction to hear a case. Subject matter jurisdiction is rather straight forward - the court must have jurisdic tion to hear the particular type of dispute (see my video for further explanation of this concept).…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BLTE 10e AM Ch03

    • 3437 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The traditional method of resolving a legal dispute is through litigation. Alternative methods include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. In negotiation, the parties attempt to settle their dispute informally without the involvement of a third party acting as mediator. In…

    • 3437 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction, General Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter is a court that can hear only certain kinds of cases listed in the federal statutes and constitution. Personal is a court that makes decisions binding on the person involved in a civil case.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The authority of a court to hear and decide cases is called the jurisdiction. When a case is first brought to court is the authority of the original jurisdiction. When there is an error of law and the courts need to review the case, they will go to the appellate jurisdiction. When the court has the power to hear any case, this is called general jurisdiction. Special jurisdiction is where the court has the authority to hear exceptional circumstances. A particular…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    paralegal

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Precedent is prior decisions of the same court or a higher court that a judge must follow. Stare decisis “ Stand by the thing decided” Related to the concept of precedent; Rule that a court should apply the same legal principle to the same set of facts and apply it to later cases that are similar…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Common Law Assignment

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue is it’s unclear whether Jessie is making an offer to sell or an offer simply as a gift as they have been friends for 15 years. In order to determine if a valid offer has been made application of the objective test would be applied1. Would a reasonable person in these circumstances believe there to be a valid offer and what is the relative importance of the statement to each party2? Jessie’s statement made to Ian that he is happy to ‘let go’ of his car with the wording he has used has the potential to make the situation somewhat ambiguous, Jessie’s true intentions are unclear. The statement is not definite and lacks sufficient finality for the statement to be classed as an offer3. Although his wording is uncertain the courts will also look at what context the statement was made and because Ian did state he wanted to ‘buy’ a car for his daughter then the statement can be argued both ways. Jessie then invited Ian to his home to look at the car although there is still no conversation about the sale of the car. This offer doesn’t have terms that are clear and final and therefore the requirement of a valid offer has not been satisfied.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Law is laws that were created by the court system and are used for cases when requiring precedent. Common Law is composed of established principles of law on a just resolution of disputes between parties (Melvin, 2011). Statutory Law can be defined and written by legislation as they do not allow the general public to behave unorderly without rules and regulations that may require punishment and a ruling by a judge in the court system.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Precedent generally refers to some prior action that guides what is done with the action today. As the judges decisions were recorded and passed around, this lead to more continuity and predictability with verdicts in court by judges. As this took place not every case had to be heard if there was an earlier decision on the issue. They referred back to the earlier decision for the case without hearing the current case.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A common-law crime is one punishable under common law, as distinguished from crimes specified by statute. In many U.S. jurisdictions, including some in which comprehensive criminal statutes have been enacted, the common law in relation to crimes and criminal procedure has been recognized by the courts as in force, except insofar as it has been abrogated or repealed, expressly or impliedly, by statute. Thus the state may prosecute crimes that were indictable at common law even though they may not be denominated as such or be provided for by statute.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State courts are divided divisions such as criminal, civil law, and family. A court in one of the divisions lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case regarding matters of another division. U.S. state courts have a general jurisdiction; it means a state court is competent to hear to hear any case which no other state has jurisdiction over. The state has a role in hearing majority of the cases (Plager, 1989). Subject jurisdiction of the federal court is limited; federal court subject matter jurisdiction is derived from the congress enabling statues.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction can be used in many different ways, depending on the circumstances. It can be most basically defined as the official power to make legal decisions and judgments. Federal and state laws can limit and grant the courts jurisdiction. In order for a court's decision to be a legally valid one, it must have two types of jurisdiction: personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction rules determine whether a court has power over a particular defendant, you can't just sue someone in your home state if the defendant doesn't live in your state, has never been in your state, and doesn't do business in your state. Where subject matter jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays