Preview

Tyrant In The Republic, The Iliad And Exodus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tyrant In The Republic, The Iliad And Exodus
“For People to rule themselves in a Republic, they must have virtue; for a Tyrant to rule in a Tyranny, he must use fear” – William J. Federer. A Tyranny is a type of ancient Greek government, that was formed in the 6th century BC, in which an individual ruler (tyrant) have absolute power over the entire state. Most of the time a tyrant would gain power by “usurping” (by force) or by getting elected. In modern society, we depict Tyrant as an oppressive leader based on the meaning of the word. Although, the ancient Greeks believe that a tyrant is not an oppressive but rather a leader that brings protection and peace to their city. It is true that a person can bring peace and protection to a city, but an individual that focus to much on gaining power that does not have any remorse or any restraint will not. Therefore, a tyrant ruler is an aggressive and an injustice individual that brings negative attitudes towards others. A tyrant would also live his awaking life in fear and unhappiness. The Republic, The Iliad, and Exodus provides great …show more content…
Socrates and Glaucon analyzes and discuss what a tyrant man is, and the life that he lives in by illustrating “three proofs”. During the conversation Socrates states that, “lust will dwell within him as a tyrant, in total anarchy and lawlessness” (p. 290). Socrates is explaining that lust is the most dangerous form of all desires. A tyrant becomes a slave to his irrational desires, and tries to continue to feed his desires by stealing from others and commit murders. However, he will never be able to fulfill it. So, he would have to live a life of unhappiness and fear among the victims that he has done wrong. Because of his aggressive actions, he will never have any freedom and will never develop any friendships. At the end, Socrates states that the bad and unjust is the unhappiest which is a tyrant that brings fear among the people of the state and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the sixth and seventh century, Archaic Greece saw to the emergence of tyrants as a form of government due to social and political inequality. The tyrant’s form of government was effective economically and socially as it stabilised social disruptions and economic distress. However, it eventually led to political rivalry, which destabilised their form of government.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within philosophy, the idea that power results from physical and situational force is known as moral realism, of which Callicles is essentially the founder. Simplistically, as Callicles asserts within "Gorgias," the powerful, and subsequently just ruler, is one who exerts force to maintain influence. Thus, following this line of thought, might makes right. Throughout the dialogue, however, Socrates repeatedly argues that temperance overrides brute force. He suggests instead, that control over our desires, such as the desire to rule according to individual belief rather than the majority's benefit, is true power. He also makes it clear that power hungry, inconsiderate leaders have no true strength, because according to Socrates, a ruler who cannot control his own convictions has no control in any other aspects of life. However, despite the philosophical logic of these assertions, leaders even today unthinkingly rely on armies and weapons to enforce their personal (and not always authentic) views of justice.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dionysius Is A Tyrant

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I will now briefly discuss Dionysius I, a tyrant of Syraceus during the classical period of Greek history. Aristotle, in his work Politics, wrote, ‘a tyrant is set up from among the people and the multitude to oppose the notables, in order that the people may suffer no injustice from them’ . As before with the Cypselid dynasty, we see Dionysius I come to power with the aid of the military and the demos. However despite their origins we once again during Dionysius reign see the steady decline of populous support. Dionysius I was an aristocrat and held a clerical position within the political system of Syraceus until he was elected as a general in 405B.C. Once again we see a tyrant using social unrest to gain access to power. During the Peloponnesian…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gorgias had been arguing that rhetoric was almost synonymous with power, as a rhetor can convince anyone to do anything. This, to Gorgias and Polus, is true power and will lead to one’s happiness. However, from the measly two pages or so of argument, Socrates is able to prove sound doubt as to whether this is true or not. This is all to back up Socrates’ earlier claim that “both rhetors and tyrants have the smallest power in the cities” (466d4-5). By using the argument of justice, Socrates is able to prove that doing what is unjust is not good for anyone, especially the person committing the injustices.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During The Iliad we see the warrior ethos as being the main ethos, but as we transfer to The Odyssey we see the transformation from warrior ethos to domestic ethos. Furthermore, the novel is based on domestic ethos and how home affects the warrior. Throughout The Odyssey we see Odysseus trying to make his way home after the Trojan War. On his adventure home he goes through trials and challenges before he actually makes it home. He has to outsmart people to be able to get where he wants to with out dying. This task is not easy but eventually he makes it. Moreover, we realize that warrior ethos is not the major ethos represented in the novel. It is domestic ethos. Odysseus learns how to use the domestic ethos to his advantage to be able to make it back home and see his family.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After this, Socrates goes on to show that there are four types of regimes, listed in the order of most just to least just: aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny. Then he goes on to say how each develops from the other, and why each is just and/or unjust. Similarly, the men from each era represent the amount of justice in their souls. This in turn proves that the just man is happier than the unjust man.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After that outburst from Thrasymachus showing pride of himself I asked Socrates what was all that about. He tells me that first I have to know who is Thrasymachus, and how he is portrayed in “The Republic” written by Plato. He is portrayed as a sophist and cynic who argues that people are selfish. By this argument that Thrasymachus yelled to us that “justice is in the interest of the strong and the subjects obeying the interest of the strong” he claims that whoever is at the top of the hierarchy is ultimately the one who has the most power, and that the ruler comes up with this rules on a self-interest base. He claims that justice is mostly the interest of the strong, and those who have more authoritarian power are those who rule the justice system and the system in general. As he states “in all states alike “right” has the same meaning, namely what is for the interest of the party established in power, and that is the strongest” (Thrasymachus, 13). Ultimately, each leader makes…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Polycrates

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With reference to one tyrant studied, to what extent were tyrants positive in Ancient Greece?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Socrates Failure

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The virtue in individuals does not always bring prosperity to the state on the whole. Not everyone is sensitive to the good of the others. Socrates' republic is, in this sense, utopic. Socrates states, "Anyone who intends to practise his craft well never does or orders but his best for himself " (Plato, 23). This belief does not match the modern experience nor does it match the experience of a Greek citizen in Ancient Greece. In reverse, Thrasymachus believes that justice is a means for the strong to exercise advantage. In a sense Thrasymachus associates the strenght of a citizen with his authority and position in the society. He famously states, "Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger" (Plato, 14). Justice is a tool for the established order to preserve itself. The strong citizen with a sizeable authority makes use of justice in a manner to assert his private interests. Under the shadow of justice, he can easily practise injustice and impose it as justice to the others. Thats why the strong is in a position to employ justice and injustice at their own interest. For instance, since a ruler makes laws in a position to twist justice for his own benefit. Therefore, his prior concern is to preserve and enhance his own authority. In order to do that, he ignores the welfare of his subjects. He does not act always within a moral…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moreover, he or she wants the best for the people rather than forcing them to automatically agree with the decisions. Additionally, he or she does not demand respect. Rather, the public would respect him or her based on his or her character. Under a tyrant’s rule, only the brave are more likely to revolt against unfair laws. However, the public’s rebellion would soon lead to consequences such as severe punishment or death. Additionally, people would soon become afraid of speaking their mind, fearing that the tyrant would come after them. Although I am somewhat supportive of authority, I often find myself questioning their position. In other words, I realized that if the public blindly obeys authority figures without conscience, then they all are setting themselves for a tragedy. Having authority is necessary, yet the ability of questioning creates a power balance between the authority figure and the people. It is up to the public to take action if they are not satisfied with their authority…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greek Government

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lastly let us look at the Greek government which most of us are already familiar with, a democracy. The word democracy comes from the Greek word demos, which means rule of the people. This meant that the citizens (free men) had real power when it came to laws and decisions of the government. The most famous Greek city state that operated as a democracy was Athens. Another definition of demos, is mob rule. This was one of the flaws of a democracy in ancient Greece. Emotions would take over and the people would make irrational decisions based on mob mentality (Cartwright,…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Richmond Lattimore’s The Iliad of Homer, substance in one’s identity seems only attainable through seeking glory. Rather than substance, the name that they are given serves more as a title than a true summary of their character. Despite the myriad of “heroes”, The Iliad displays the worst traits of man in all including the heroes themselves as well as the venerable gods of Olympos. Even with these horrible traits, can their extraordinary accomplishments truly compensate and catapult them to hero status?…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays