Preview

Tresspass to Land

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tresspass to Land
Trespass to land

Definition: Trespass to land occurs where a person directly enters upon another’s land without permission, or remains upon the land or places or projects any object upon the land. (There is no need to prove damage).

The ways in which trespass can occur:
1. Entering upon land.
E.g. walking onto land without permission or refusing to leave when permission has been withdrawn or throwing objects on land.
Basely v Clarkson (1681)
D owned land adjoining C’s and whilst mowing his own lawn he involuntarily and by mistake mowed down some grass on the C’s land. C was successful in claiming against trespass.
This case is also an example of mistaken entry.

2. Trespass to the airspace.
E.g. there can be trespass to airspace if the D is within a reasonable height.
Kelsen V Imperial Tobacco Co. (1957)
D committed trespass by allowing an advertising board to project 8 inches into C’s property at ground level and another above ground level.

3. Trespass to the ground beneath the surface.
Bulli coal mining Co. V Osborne (1899)
The D’s mined form their land through the C’s land.

Involuntary entry
An involuntary trespass is not actionable. E.g. Smith V Stone (1647)
D was carried onto C’s land by force and violence of others. There was trespass by the people who carried D onto the land but not by the defendant.

Negligent entry
A negligent entry is possible and was considered in League against cruel sports V Scott (1985).
A keeper of foxhounds (D) was liable for allowing the hounds to trespass onto the land owned by another person (C) during a hunt.

Rights of entry
* A private right of way granted to the D
* Public right of way
* A right given by a common law
* A right of access given by a statute

Continuing trespass
A continuing trespass is a failure to remove an object (or the defendant) unlawfully placed on the land. It will lead to a new cause of action each day as long as it lasts.
Holmes v Wilson (1839)
The D’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On September 11, 2011, our client, John Dunham, shot and killed three trespassing hunting dogs on his property. He then used his dog as a deadly weapon to injure Jesse Hester, owner of the hunting dogs. Dunham raises an affirmative defense that he was merely protecting wildlife on his property and possessed a legal right to do so. Pursuant to my research, Dunham will most likely be charged with three crimes and unable to raise an affirmative defense to protection of wildlife on private property.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Plaintiff trespassed on defendant’s property with the intent to steal items from inside the un-occupied house and was shot in the leg by a spring gun hidden behind a door.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    8)Did the court find that there were sufficient parts and instructions available to conclude that the defendant did, in fact, possess an illegal weapon?…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Javier Galindo, the husband of the plaintiff, was sitting in his car in the driveway of Mr. Clark's property waiting to pick up his wife, who worked as a housekeeper for Mr. Clark, when a leaning 80 ft tree on an adjacent property fell on the plaintiff's husband's car and killed him. Ms. Galindo sued Mr. Clark for failing to notify her husband of the danger posed by the leaning tree.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Tenn.Ct.App., 2008). In this case the following facts were argued: The dispute arose over a strip of land located on the northern side of Underwood Repair Service's property Lot 1 and the southern side of the Deans' property Lot 2. Underwood Repair Service asserted that it owned the disputed strip of land in fee simple, or, in the alternative, through adverse possession. The Deans filed a motion to dismiss both claims, and the trial court granted the motion to dismiss the adverse possession claim, finding…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aarons V. Peterson

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, he took no measures to secure the tools either by fastening a lock or relocating the toolbox to a less accessible location. His failure to protect the children from the potential harm arising from their use of the tools is a breach of his duty owed to the plaintiff. Causation - The defendant’s son was able to obtain dangerous instruments, a hammer and nail, which were housed within an accessible toolbox. While using the hammer to make a blow to a nail, the nail flew out from the wood and stuck the neighbor. Actual Injury - The nail strike chipped the neighbor’s front teeth, bloodied his nose, and gashed his cheek.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Trespass to Land: Defendant enter plaintiff’s land or causes a person or thing to do so.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is the story that I have witnessed in my community. The dispute between the boundaries of houses led to the misunderstanding of each other. Since I do not own any rights to appear theirs real name in this paper, let’s assume they are James and Taylor. James and Taylor were longtime neighbors and best friends before the dispute happened. One day, Taylor had done some changes in her front gate, which included laying a concrete slab. This concrete slab intruded on James’ property line. Taylor and James had many strong emotions about what was the best way to resolve this property line dispute. For Taylor it was only a few cm. But for James it was a very important few cm. James, concerned about maintaining his current property rights, insisted that Taylor to remove the concrete. Taylor felt that in the spirit of being good neighbors the cm should be overlooked. On the top of the issue, there was a third party, “the property line agency” that was called by Taylor to mediate this issue. James felt betrayed that Taylor had called the property line agency on him a few months earlier. Taylor had called property line agency to get help with the property line issue. Shockingly, while investigating the property line, the agent noticed that James had constructed a concrete grave of his father 5cm in the backyard of Taylor’s property land. James was forced to move his father grave from Taylor’s land. James blamed Taylor. Taylor hadn’t meant for that to happen. Then she understood James’ anger towards her. In the end, James and Taylor made several apologies to one another and let go these past transgressions. Concrete slab of Taylor was still constructed and James’ father grave was also not removed. As a result of the mediation, James and Taylor were spared the expense of the property line agency and more importantly, returned to being good…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 1 W300

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both civil claims which will be brought in the county court or High Court depending on the value of the claim.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages

    9. Defendants were negligent in their inspection of the property by negligently provided incorrect analysis of the condition of both the basement and foundation…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel

    • 3257 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Was the boy a trespasser? If so, does this mean that the owner of the land did not owe the boy a duty of care?…

    • 3257 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of Reeves vs Meridian Southern, it was alleged that Meridian Southern placed railcars on spurs without permission. Meridian had used this spur for years and years without incident till this case. Meridian Southern should have been informed by Reeves about the change of ownership. Trespassers are ones who enter another’s land unlawfully without consent or the privilege to be there. By this definition, Meridian Southern is trespassing Reeve’s land. This could have all been avoided if Meridian Southern would have asked for permission to use the spur. Even if they had to pay for the use of it.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics