Preview

Too Big To Fail

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Too Big To Fail
TOO BIG TO FAIL
Jamie Dimon, CEO, of JP Morgan Chase, attended an emergency meeting at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on September 17, 2008.
A dozen CEOs from rival firms were present-the meeting’s goal was to devise a plan to save Lehman Brothers, the nation’s fourth largest investment bank, from bankruptcy.
Dimon knew Merrill Lynch and AIG were also in trouble.
Many present at the meeting thought the government would step in and rescue Lehman Brothers.

Dimon held a conference call with his top management team and said to prepare for a filing not just of Lehman Brothers, but also for Merrill Lynch, AIG, Morgan Stanley, and possibly Goldman Sachs.
Fear and disorder gripped the market-the financial sector seemed to unravel.
Yet, in 2007 the financial services sector accounted for more than 40% of corporate profits.
The mortgage industry was an important piece of the sector. Mortgage loans served as components for complicated financial products that Wall Street bought and sold.
People knew that Goldman Sach’s was going to go under. It would be bad and becomes the Great Depression.

In 2007, those working in the financial sector received compensation in the aggregate worth 53 billion. The CEO of Goldman Sachs, Loyld Blankfein, took home 68 million.
Wall Street used a lot of debt to finance its activities. There was cheap money from savings glut in Asia and ease in Fed Policy in response to the 2001 recession.
Cheap money found its way into the subprime mortgage market-Wall Street firms believe they had a way to slice up mortgage loans and sell them, thereby removing a log of the risk off their balance sheets. They also bought a lot of mortgage back securities from each other. Bank gave out loans but know they couldn’t pay back. People claiming they were making lots of money but it wasn’t true.

Bernanke believe in April 2007 that problems in the subprime mortgage market could be contained. By August 2007 in the $2 trillion subprime

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The major changes to mortgages that occurred in the 1990s were driven by factors on the supply side of the housing market. Based on continuous historical growth, financial firms, through the use of mortgage brokers, started lending money to borrowers who did not qualify for standard loans. Firms expected high returns from high interest rates and brokers expected high commissions and broker fees. Additionally, many financial firms began bundling mortgages into MBSs and selling them on the private market, primarily to government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These GSEs perceived the MBSs as safe due to their high rating from rating agencies and readily bought them. As some firms began to see success with these subprime loans, more suppliers entered the mortgage market, including prominent Wall Street financial firms. Soon a surplus of mortgages flooded the housing market.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Econ

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. When Lehman brothers was in trouble, Henry Paulson called the other banks’ CEOs on a meeting to find a solution to Lehman Brothers’s problem? Why did Henry Paulson think that a private sector solution, instead of government bailout, was needed?…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On account of the housing bubble formation, it was believed by investors and lenders that property value/housing was a good investment. Interest rates were low so property value was high due to buyers being able to afford to buy a house. Bankers developed a mortgage program known as subprime mortgages geared towards borrowers that had no credit history or that had bad credit (inability to pay back) to take out loans. The more affordable the loans were, the more people borrowed money. Banks began to lower their standards and allow borrowers with poor credit to get approved for loans that only prime borrowers would qualify for. Banks also took larger risks by collaborating with investors. During the time of the housing bubble, many people became…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This growth came in the form collateralized debt obligations backed by subprime loans. The subprime loan originators were not regulated properly and lent to those who otherwise would not qualify for a loan. The new homeowners enjoyed a period of prosperity while housing prices exploded. Wanting to cash in on their new found wealth many refinanced to a variable rate loan never expecting housing prices would fall and interest rates would increase. Unfortunately, incomes did not rise therefore when people refinanced and the economy tried to adjust itself for the inflation occurring within the housing market many loans defaulted as interest rates rose and housing prices fell. The subprime loan originators (i.e., also wanted to make a profit and started selling their subprime loans to securities firms. These securities firms, i.e. The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., made their profit in the packaging and trading of the Mortgage Backed Security or MBS, and the Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO). The CDOs were a collection of good or prime loans mixed with some bad or subprime loans that were not sold as part of MBSs. These packages were then sent to the credit rating agencies like Moody’s for their credit rating. Moody’s were complicit in giving CDOs that would have been rated as F’s a triple "A" rating meaning they were less risky…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dodd Frank Thesis

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were several factors that contributed to the market failure that can be observed as far back as the repeal of The Glass-Steagall legislation in 1998. Banks became involved with precarious investments, asset managers began dealing in high-yield mortgage-backed securities, and credit agencies such as Moody’s, S&P and Fitch presented AAA ratings on the junk securities all of which was just the start of the breakdown in the market. Then in 2006, there was a strong drive for short-term profits in which 84% of sub-prime mortgages were issued by private lending firms to low and moderate income borrowers (Swift, 2011). The lack of regulation allowed companies to write trillions of dollars in derivatives all while not reserving any dollars against future claims. Additionally, with combination of the majority of the sub-prime lenders not being obligated to the standard mortgage laws and regulations, the use of nonbank underwriters, and exempt status from federal regulations lead to the financial crisis of…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In return, housing prices dropped “following a period of easy money and excess demand” (27). The problem became that more and more unqualified debtors defaulted and money turned into more houses. The price of houses started to decrease and caused homeowners paying the mortgage to be overpaying as the price of their house fell. These families left their mortgage and more money turned into houses for financial institutions. “Mortgage backed securities held by financial firms, foreign investors, and governments lost most of their value” (Kharusi and Weagley, 27).…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brad

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The sub-prime mortgage crisis or the 2008 Financial Crisis was a devastating downturn of Wall Street and subsequently the world’s economies. In summary, there were too many people with mortgages that couldn’t pay up and things took a tumble. However, there are a lot of factors that entered into this.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Financial Crisis of 2008

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The housing slump then set off a chain reaction of problems in our county. Foreclosures drastically increased, leaving investors and financial institutions with the mess. This forced banks to tighten their lending requirements, but for most of them, the damage had already been done. Banks were on the verge of collapsing, so to prevent this from happening, government run companies like Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac bailed out most of the failing banks by providing them with more of these risky subprime loans. Not only did Fannie and Freddy save many banks, they also offered huge bonuses to their employees and certain members of Congress. Eventually, this would cause the bankruptcy of Fannie and Freddie along with many other banks that would further add to the failing economy and the 2008 financial…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rise and Fall Housing Market

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 11 ]. Bianco, K. (2008). The subprime lending crisis: causes and effects of the mortgage meltdown.…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 02

    • 1790 Words
    • 7 Pages

    They decreased interest rates, and subprime mortgage came into play. They seized a few companies that controlled a lot of the mortgage. The congress passed a 700 billion dollar bailout plan. As the new administration began Obama passed a 825 billion dollar bailout plan.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The corrupt big banks were full of greed and poor ethics. Mortgage approval rates were much too high which led to many more home buyers. This caused housing prices to rise like crazy. Mortgage companies and banks were lending money to people that should not have been lent money. They were falsifying loan documents in order to make a loan and obtain fees regardless of risk. Money was being borrowed to people…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stock market crash in 2000 lead people and investors to lose their confidence in the market, which then prompted them to put their money into the housing market. The federal reserve and banks thought that the housing market was creating wealth. People were buying and flipping houses left and right. They noticed the prices of houses increasing, it became easier to get a loan from banks because of the lower standards for loans. When people applied for their loans at the banks, the banks would approve them, securitize the loan, and then pass the risk of the loan off to some other bank or agency.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Subprime Mortgage loans did contribute to the bubble and crash but they were just the cards played by the government and the policies that rule them. The department of housing and urban development was pushing national homeownership since 1995 and the doing away with down payments. This was a big problem because everyone started riding the coat-tails of these MBS’s and credit started loosening drastically. After this boom, the housing department then adopted mandates for the government enterprises that issue these securities, Fannie and Freddie. Springing from 342 billion in 1997 to 741 billion a year later was this new issuance of MBSs and the beginning to bubble burst. Because the GSEs believed that the government would protect them from any losses due to the implicit guarantee from it, they continued on issuing these loans to the country. Bringing the idea that everyone and anyone could finance a home caused demand to rise and so did house prices. Along with these initial mandates, lowering of credit scores and increasing allowable debt for borrowers came in 2000 by the HUD. From 469 billion in 2000 to 2.2 trillion in2003 shows how the housing bubble with these government backed securities, toxins, just kept being pumped into the market and would soon be gone.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lehman Brothers at the time had approximately $650 billion to $700 billion of assets on its balance sheet, most of it tied to the subprime market. With this being said, Lehman Brothers strategy focused on the subprime and commercial real estate markets. Their strategy was fully endorsed by the board of directors, which involved heavily borrowing to make increasingly risky loans. These loans took its leverage ratio up to 30 times its underlying stockholder’s…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    This environment of easy credit and the upward spiral of home prices made investments in higher yielding subprime mortgages look like a new rush for gold. The Fed continued slashing interest rates, emboldened, perhaps, by continued low inflation despite lower interest rates. In June 2003, the Fed lowered interest rates to 1%, the lowest rate in 45 years. The whole financial market started resembling a candy shop where everything was selling at a huge discount and without any down payment. "Lick your candy now and pay for it later" - the entire subprime mortgage market seemed to encourage those with a sweet tooth for have-it-now investments. Unfortunately, no one was there to warn about the tummy aches that would follow. (For more reading on the subprime mortgage market, see our Subprime Mortgages special feature.)…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays