As a point of clarification, the Toltecs did not settle and construct Chichén Itzá; the city existed before the Toltec diaspora. With that being said, the architectural similarities between Chichén Itzá and Tula denote a cultural link between the two, seemingly distant people. Feathered-serpent columns, chacmools, warrior columns, atlantean figures, wall panels, and other sculptural motifs which were discovered in Tula in the early twentieth century seemed to parallel those excavated in Chichén Itzá. Moreover, the Toltec presence is observed through building techniques, pottery types, artistic depictions of warriors, and small sculptural details. Even though there is mythological evidence suggesting that the flow of people went from Chichén Itzá to Tula, the material evidence recovered at both sites affirms the argument that the Toltecs were the source of inspiration. In sum, analogous to the influence on Palenque and Calakmul by Teotihucan, Chichén Itzá experienced a similar cultural force from
As a point of clarification, the Toltecs did not settle and construct Chichén Itzá; the city existed before the Toltec diaspora. With that being said, the architectural similarities between Chichén Itzá and Tula denote a cultural link between the two, seemingly distant people. Feathered-serpent columns, chacmools, warrior columns, atlantean figures, wall panels, and other sculptural motifs which were discovered in Tula in the early twentieth century seemed to parallel those excavated in Chichén Itzá. Moreover, the Toltec presence is observed through building techniques, pottery types, artistic depictions of warriors, and small sculptural details. Even though there is mythological evidence suggesting that the flow of people went from Chichén Itzá to Tula, the material evidence recovered at both sites affirms the argument that the Toltecs were the source of inspiration. In sum, analogous to the influence on Palenque and Calakmul by Teotihucan, Chichén Itzá experienced a similar cultural force from