Preview

To What Extent Was Germany Responsible for the Outbreak of Ww1?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1051 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Germany Responsible for the Outbreak of Ww1?
To what extent was Germany responsible for the outbreak of WWI?

There is much debate about the degree of responsibility that should be given to Germany for the outbreak of war. One could argue that the outbreak of war was entirely Germany’s fault due to their aggression with the other Great Powers of Europe and the very presence of the Schlieffen Plan. One could also argue that Germany was merely protecting herself against aggression and the idea of encirclement. Or was it a misfired attempt at strengthening relationships with the Entente powers? Either way one can deduce that Germany had a significant role in the outbreak for war, but should not necessarily be held fully accountable.

Aggression already existed between the Entente and Germany, it is clear that Germany aimed to prevent their empire from falling due to the prevalent risk of fighting a war on two fronts. This was amended by the creation of the Schlieffen Plan. It was produced by General Alfred Von Schlieffen in 1905, it showed German intentions to invade France, but the time they would execute the plan remained ambiguous, however this is irrelevant. The very existence of a plan to attack another Great Power highlighted the resentment Germany held toward France, their depth of knowledge and the assumptions they made, strengthened the fact that Germany would eventually invade, and each step was carefully calculated so it was timeless plan that could be executed at any moment and without a doubt lead to the outbreak of world war.

The other side of this argument is that the outbreak of war was not Germany’s fault and that her armament was a defensive technique. Germany was potentially going to have to face the greatest navy in the world along with her allies, by 1904, German military advisors were adamant that with Russia industrializing and French resentment, Germany would eventually be pulled into a war on two fronts as both countries were a threat. Germany had close to no colonies in the world

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the sources give different impressions as to wether Germany's leaders are responsibe for the outbreak of the First World War. Source 1 seems to strongly suggest that German leaders and the German Government did in fact push for the war with Hewitson blaming the Army and suggesting that Germany was looking for an opportunity to start war however he does not fully support the view that German leaders were responsible.Porter and Armour (Source 2) strongly supports this view by again pointing to the millitary and prime minister Bethmann Hollweg looking for an opportunity to wage war but again not fully placing the blame on Germany but looking at the threating actions of Russia and Britain. In contrast to both Source 1 and 2 Norman Stone ( Source 3) does not blame Germany, instead he suggest that the tension in Europe for the last decade finally reached an ultimatum in the July crisis and the war was the fault of all Great powers.…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German delegation leader believed that Germany was not at all responsible for world war one, the Treaty of Versailles take it that Germany is the one responsible for this war due to their loss(Doc.4). At the delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference the German delegation leader had protested that one of the causes of this war was imperialism. The method of imperialism added to the threat to other countries because of its policies of retaliation and expansion(Doc.5). As a result of there being an expansion throughout European nations, mobilization occurred. Mobilization lead to militarism adding to the factors of tension and threats. While, both the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1, written by Blackbourn agrees with the statement that Germany’s aggressive actions were responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. L.F.C Turner also agrees with Blackbourn that the outbreak of the First World War was primarily down to Germany’s aggressive actions whereas Niall Ferguson disagrees with the statement and instead believes that Germany were relaxed before the outbreak of the First World War.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never the less, we can also argue that the war in 1914 arose primarily as a result of German aggression because the war was planned in order to achieve “great power status”. It is source two that presents the theory of Fritz Fischer, in which he states that “Germany bore full responsibility for the war”. Fischer is enforcing the point that Germany was indeed aggressive and power hungry, this would suggest a suitable motive for them to go to war and therefore disagree with the opinion above. Further on, source two once again refers to the power hungry nature of Germany. “War was the only final mean by which the ruling elites could seek to maintain their power”, you could interpret this quote in two ways, you could say that this suggests the Germans were in fact trapped and they could only see one way to go on, through war. However I think that the source in fact is suggesting that they wanted to expand throughout Europe to gain a greater power status, to do this they had to go…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Source 2 also partially agrees that the decisions made by Germany’s leaders were responsible for the outbreak of war as it states, ‘The argument of a preventative defense suggests that the Bethmann-Hollweg government…

    • 1381 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I as Germany blame England as being responsible for starting World War One because they started Imperialism. Imperialism led to alliances, nationalism, and militarism. To begin with, the Treaty of Versailles says that England’s Queen Victoria caused the Scramble for Africa. Knowing this, England basically forced me to create alliances because I felt that England was going to become too powerful and be too threatening. England created tensions because of their need to feel superior which is why it is not a surprise that we got into a war. Having the alliances got all of Europe involved which made it into World War One.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The menace of the hostile division led to an arms race, another cause of World War One. Germany was the leader in a military organization and efficiency, the great powers of Europe copied the universal conscription and detailed planning of the Prussian System. The armies of France and Germany doubled in size between 1870 and 1914. Naval expansion was also competitive, particularly between Germany and Great Britain. British had established the principle that maintained naval superiority in the event of the…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Once Austria declared war on Serbia for the assassination of the Duke, Russia would enter the war because they supported Serbia since, according to Ponting, they wanted to support another “Slav and Orthodox State” which led to the outbreaks of war.5 Germany planned to attack France first because they were scared she would mobilize faster than her ally Russia but Germany didn’t expect Russia to mobilize as fast as she did. When she mobilized armies against Austria she had also mobilized armies against Germany.6Britain at the time was neutral which was beneficial to Germany as the German ambassador remarked “has the best colonies and doesn’t need a war with us…”7 Once Germany attacked Belgium, who was neutral, to get to France it guaranteed Britain to come to war as well as France. The Carnegie report blames Germany for also causing a greater war once they violated the “neutrality of Belgium and Luxemburg.”…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Selsdon

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is true that the nature of the Schlieffen plan is important in explaining why war broke out in 1914. A J P Taylor best sums this up by saying that “the moment Germany decided on mobilisation they decided on war”. However the reasons Germany decided to mobilise for war are more complex and when analysing these details it becomes clear that Germany is not solely to blame for causing the war. However they were a major part of the July crisis which led to war. Taylor goes further with his argument by saying that German plans (the Schlieffen plan) “actually laid down the first 40 days of the German mission” which takes them deep into Belgium and France, whereas other plans for mobilisation only brought “troops to their barracks”. However Grenville disagrees with the statement that other plans didn’t mean war, he argues that the Russian mobilisation “made war inevitable”. This is where it is important to realise that European politics are in such a fragile state that only one country mobilising, if it was…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wwi Essay

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most important of the long term effects leading to the outbreak of war was imperialism. Seemingly all at once, the great European Empires broke free of their decided boundaries, and expanded into colonies spanning the entire earth. Most colonized was Africa, due to the fact that it seemed every country had a piece of her. Distances meant nothing, as many countries spread over thousands of thousands of miles to set up a new colony. England holds the best example of this, as it managed to colonize Australia. Unfortunately, Germany was in troubled times. Instead of a unified country, Germany saw herself in many states. When the great Empires began to spread, Germany pulled together. This, however, was too late, and Germany was left with little to colonize. They began to pick up the scraps, the chunks of countries not colonized, which tended to yield little resources to the motherland, in hopes of still keeping some power. Germany now felt jealous, and needed to prove its power to the rest of Europe. They fought for new colonies, although gained little. Soon, they felt the need to increase the army and navy, in the hopes of becoming the strongest militarized nation. Militarism was not unusual, and generally poses little threat. The Kaiser wanted Germany to be a strong world power, with a Navy enough to challenge Great Britain's. This began the Naval Race. Great Britain was…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One cause of World War I was Militarism. Germany had an industrialized military and spent millions of dollars trying improve and prepare them for war. Many other countries seen this newfound competition and started to try and rebuild their armies and navy so they could keep up. With Germany’s new and improved army, they started to gain confidence and were convinced that they could win a war. Germany was very focused on utilizing their army. As soon as the war declared, Germany without a doubt didn’t hesitate to “make the first move.” This caused a problem however because of the other nations rush to industrialize their armies and try to make them just as good or if not better than Germanys. Militarism played a huge part in the cause of World War I.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Schlieffen Plan was Germany’s attack strategy against France. The plan was to attack France once Russia started to release troops near the German border. After the Schlieffen Plan failed Germany, it eventually led to Britain declaring war against Germany on August of 1914. Britain showed no interest in going to war, but they were sucked in on account of Germany’s equalized success with Britain. Even invading Russia and Belgium, being a part of the Schlieffen Plan, didn’t force them into war. Britain sitting out the war was what Germany wanted. They also wanted the British to ignore the treaty they had with London and allow German passage through…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 1 was a tragic event that happened in the early 1900’s. Many people lost their family members and friends. Most may think that Serbia caused World War 1 by assassinating Austria’s archduke, but others may say different. Germany caused World War 1 because of the actions they did during this time.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics