Preview

To Kill A Mockingbird Wealth Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To Kill A Mockingbird Wealth Analysis
Social Justice: Distribution of Wealth Ever since an early human decided to give intrinsic value to a bushel of wheat for trade, money has been a quintessential part of human culture. As time has gone on, a flaw in this system has become apparent: some people have lots of money while others have very little. Today, this very flaw is the basis of a large portion of today’s issues, like corruption or poverty.
Monetary Inequalities
Wealth is distributed unequally amongst the world’s people. This issue has been a long-standing, global problem, and applies to numerous people and numerous measurements of wealth. In terms of income, which is one of these measurements, “[…] the lowest quintile of U.S. households accounted for 3.4% of total income,
…show more content…
The story is set after the Great Depression, which caused millions to fall into poverty. Walter Cunningham and his family are a family affected by this, since Scout reasons that “[Walter Cunningham] had probably never seen three quarters together at the same time in his life” after witnessing him lack a school lunch and referencing his family reputation (Lee 22). Walter comes from a farming family, and they happen to be impoverished “[...because] the crash hit [farmers] hardest” (Lee 23). Walter and his family are poor enough for them not to have 75 cents (around $10 in today’s money) at once due to their extreme poverty, and this has created their penniless reputation in Maycomb. Poor farming families like the Cunninghams share their predicament with other families in Maycomb, like the Ewells. The Ewells, a large, long-standing family inhabiting the Maycomb dump, “lived as guests of the county [... but their] relief check was far from enough to feed the family.” (Lee 193, 208). The Ewells are poor enough to receive sums of money from the government, but despite the support, they still lack sufficient funds to fully care for themselves. This is caused by Bob Ewell’s alcoholic tendencies, which use up large sums of the welfare checks to buy somewhat expensive alcoholic drinks. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, two completely different families …show more content…
Over a 9-year period between 1989 and 1998, “[...] the proportion of net worth owned by the top 1 percent [...] rose from 30 percent to more than 34 percent [while...] those in the bottom 90 percent declined from 33 percent to just over 30 percent” (Ciment). Wealth is gradually shifting towards the few and affluent at the expense of the numerous poor due to the increased power of corporations and the rich. The rich and their corporations are able to influence the way money circulates, allowing more money to be diverted to them from the lower and middle classes. This creates the basis as to why the rich continue accumulating wealth while the rest of the populace loses it. Additionally, the rich earn money faster than everyone else, giving them an advantage after recessions.“93 per cent of the income gains in the first official year of economic recovery went to the top one per cent [in terms of wealth] in the US” (Jones). Despite the recent economic gains, most of the population is not benefited by them, with the rich having the largest gains. The poor and middle classes’ incomes remain stagnant or even decrease, highlighting the great disparity between the rich and everyone else. When economic gains are made, money only goes to certain groups, leaving others the same or worse

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After watching the video, "Wealth Inequality in America", published by Politizane, I was surprised when finding out that only the top one percent of America has 40 percent of all the nation's wealth. It was also surprising to discover that the top one percent owns half the country's stocks, bonds, and mutual bonds, while the bottom 50 percent of Americans own only half a percent of these investments. One of the notions I had that was challenged by the video was the amount of money the wealthy actually have compared to the rest of the classes. I was aware that wealth mostly distributed to the wealthy class, but I never imagined that the division between the wealthy class and the rest of the classes would be so huge. Its incredible that the CEO's…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A recent study done by Marco Cagetti of the Chicago Fed, illustrates that among members of the Organization For Economic Co-operation and Development, otherwise known as the OECD, the United States holds the most uneven distribution of income and wealth. A disproportionate spread of wealth is an issue citizens of the United States understand very well as this issue has made headlines and gained notoriety recently with the Occupy Wall Street movement. A certain economist, Joseph Reich, discusses the causes and effects of this uneven distribution of wealth in America as early as 1991 in his essay “Why the Rich are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer.” Reich’s essay was not only relevant when written over a decade ago, but also remains pertinent to the current economic status of America today. To portray the relationship between the rich as they continued to gain wealth and the poor as they continue to decline economically, Reich utilizes a metaphor of three different boats rising and sinking with the tide.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is shown in the fact that 68.7 percent of the world’s population only holds three percent of the wealth in the world and only 8.4 percent of the world’s population has 83.3 percent of the wealth of the world (Doc 6). The 68.7 percent of the world with the least amount of money often works in factories for very low wages, these factories being owned by the most wealthy. This relates to how those who get ahead have to step on others, with the wealthy exploiting the poor for their wealth.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is a very apparent concept in the story is the inequality and prejudice that exist in the small town. In Maycomb, the wealth of an individual is a way that consistently divided the social status of the townspeople. For example, The Finchers and other middle class people have more prestige and social status over the lower class townspeople, such as the Cunninghams and the Ewells. The most common and discriminatory inequality in the town is that the race of an individual would unjustly determine their social status. For example, the blacks, despite having more amiable qualities than the Ewells, still remain at the bottom of the social hierarchy for the only reason being their race. This lead to the Ewells exploiting the town’s racial prejudices…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major reasons that increased income and wealth inequalities was the increase in wage disparities operated in 1980s, the rate of increase has never been steady but the income disparities have stayed same all the time, or the gap kept getting bigger and bigger. Not only income disparities, the increasing unemployment rate is also a factor that caused the issue. “Earnings are by far the largest source of household income.” (Australia National University, 2013). The difference wages between hours of works made the income gap became huge. “The distribution of incomes within the wages and salary system is very important to explain a good deal of the inequality in countries like Australia.” (Richard&Dannis, 2014). Other than the income inequalities issues, the distribution of income also led Australia facing wealth inequalities. People who are getting high incomes can also hold high wealth in hand whereas the wealth of poor are growing but the gap between the wealth of poor and rich is as huge as the distribution of incomes. Below is a graph of Australia’s wealth inequalities, as we can see clearly that the distribution of income is even much more unequal than the income distribution. It is ironic that if we take the top several individuals out and compare their wealth with the bottom twenty percent, they are holding more wealth than the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolt of the Rich

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For the past couple of years, there seems to a new subject that is engulfing social circles, the internet, and the news. It seems as if citizens have discovered the 1%, or America’s richest individuals. Some have dismissed these reports as inflated statistics, greatly exaggerated and that an individual cannot own that much money. In reality, America is very much controlled by a wealthy elite, as explained by Mike Lofgren in his article “Revolt of the Rich”. Lofgren proposes that the wealthy elite in America are transitioning into separating themselves from the common population.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The top tenth of 1% of earners showed a fivefold increase in income, as for the top one hundredth of one % showed a sevenfold increase in earnings. Therefore, the climb in America’s average income was the result of the growth in the members of the highest wealthy classes.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The one moral lesson that trumped the others in grade school was definitely, “Sharing is caring.” The ability to share with others treasured toys and food indicated selflessness and a readiness to plunge into a society in which citizens must all play a part. However, when applied to the actual society and economy, this method of distributing wealth is simply overly idealistic. Society sees itself split into classes with crevices always widening, as the well-known phrase states that the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. With social welfare programs and taxes, the attempts to unify the diverse population have improved the situation drastically, and simultaneously, various…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bob Ewell lives behind the county dump where he raises his children. They live a terrible life of dirt and hunger. His kids hardly ever go to school because he makes them stay and help him get things done at home. After Mr.Ewell took the WPA job he soon lost it due to laziness. Now he has to get relief checks so he can pay for things he needs like food and clothes. But Mr.Ewell ends up spending all of his money on whiskey. Maycomb County also allows Bob to hunt and trap out of season because he doesn’t have enough money to buy food. Scout finds out and tells Atticus “... Another thing, Mr.Bob Ewell, Burris’s father, was permitted to hunt and trap out of season. Atticus, that’s bad.... In Maycomb County, hunting out of season was a misdemeanor at law, a capital felony in the eyes of the populace.” (Lee 34). Atticus has to explain to Scout that he is aloud to because he spends all of his money on whiskey and can’t afford to buy food. In the novel the author says that the economy has no bearing for people like Bob Ewell. Most people believed that because he took money and spent it on something that he didn’t need and he simply doesn’t care. He also doesn’t care about his children’s education and keeps them from going to school. Bob also runs away from his problems or blames them on someone else. One day he comes home and finds Mayella trying to kiss Tom Robinson. Tom gets chased away and Bob Ewell hurts…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In America today there is massive injustice in terms of income and wealth inequality. Injustice is rampant. We live in the wealthiest country in the history of the world but most Americans don’t know that because almost all of that wealth and income is going to the top one percent. We are living at a time where a handful of people have wealth beyond comprehension – huge yachts, jet planes, tens of billions of dollars, more money than they could spend in a thousand lifetimes. But at the same time, millions of people are struggling to feed their families or put a roof over their heads or find the money to go to a doctor.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, in the capitalist economy, wealth is distributed unevenly. The gap of wealth between wealthy and the poverished only increases as time goes on. An example would be the United States of America. In an article published by “Forbes,” it is stated that the top 1% Americans make $717,000 annually, while the other 99% makes only $51,000 annually. Another stated fact is that the wealthiest 1% controls 43% of the wealth in the nation.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In fact, economic inequality in the United States constitutes a social problem which required the appropriate solutions. According to George Ritzer (2004), “problems associated with economic inequality are closely linked to the level of development, with inequality being a far greater problem in developed nations than in less developed countries” (p. 10). Undoubtedly, such social problem as economic inequality can be found both in developed and developing countries. In the United Sates, this issue is of great importance as the American nation is based on the principle: all people are created equal and should be treated equally. Most Americans believe that they are a part of the middle class that command a large part of American society. However, today there is an evidence of certain economic differences between the rich and the poor, although the United States provides equal opportunities for personal development. According to Neckerman and Torche (2007), in the United States, the obvious economic disparities started to rise in the1970s, while the…

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    When analysing the specific distribution of wealth and income at a global level, the frequency of the term ‘Inequality’ is quite often brought to attention. This is simply because (and as expanded upon below) the distribution of wealth is anything but equal. To present a proverb or maxim of sorts, “The rich continue getting richer, while the poor; poorer”, generally summing up the current state of the global economy.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Advanced Macroeconomics

    • 2622 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It is because of the rising in inequality. He rich have got richer, and the poor have become relatively poorer. It is not that the real incomes of the lowest paid have fallen (though in some cases real incomes have been stagnant) but, they have fallen behind higher income earners. The gap between the highest paid and lowest paid has increased. In the past couple of decades it feels like the ‘rich have got richer and the poor have got poorer’. Why is this?…

    • 2622 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealth Gap

    • 2727 Words
    • 11 Pages

    To research and write this paper I first defined what I meant by the wealth gap. As opposed to income, wealth is the assets minus the debts an individual has. Therefore when I refer to the rich or the poor I define them as people with either a vast amount of assets or very little assets. I also lumped lower income individuals and families with the poor since most lower income families do not have very many assets. Since there are many different opinions and claims about the wealth gap I decided to focus this paper on the social game of the two main claims Americans listen to and discuss.…

    • 2727 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays