Preview

Tinker Case Review - the Tinker Standard

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
567 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tinker Case Review - the Tinker Standard
Bill of Rights: Tinker Case Review

What is the Tinker Standard and how does it affect schools today?

The Tinker Standard describes the right of a student has to exercise freedom of speech through symbolic gestures. It was first conceived when students Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker began wearing black armbands with the “peace” symbol as a form of passive protest against the war in Vietnam, a very controversial topic at the time. When the staff of the school they attended suspended them for wearing the armbands, on the grounds that they were detrimental to student’s learning, the pair along with Christopher Eckhart, one of the other three students to be suspended for wearing the arm bands, filed a complaint against the school for impeding on their 1st Amendment Right, the right to freedom of speech. Not satisfied with the District Court’s decision condoning the school’s actions, they appealed to the United States Supreme Court where the decision was overturned and Tinker Standard was established.

Today the Tinker Standard is still used by many thousands of students to justify displaying the confederate flag in school, among other things. They are forced to use the Tinker Standard for this purpose because many schools won’t let students wear clothing or apparel displaying the confederate flag due to its history as a symbol of racial discrimination, for fear it will incite arguments among students and disrupt the learning environment. However, students often argue that the confederate flag is a symbol of southern pride and that by wearing it they are merely paying respect to their heritage. In cases regarding the issue of whether bans on the confederate flag infringe on the rights of the students, of which there are many, the courts are often inconsistent. This can be seen when comparing the decisions of the Supreme Court in the Tinker case and of the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in a case presented by two Santa Fe High School students against the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the students in the Tinker case were protesting and in the Hazelwood case they believed that their rights got taken away.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelmeier Case Summary

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. (“Tinker V. Des Moines” 3) When students wore the arm bands they were asked to go home and suspended from school. This set up the case for Tinker v. Des Moines independent school district, a case that would determine the right of free speech for students. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Board of Norfolk, 801 F.Supp. 1526 (E.D. Va. 1992). Here, a middle school student, Kimberly Broussard, wore a t-shirt that read “Drugs Suck”. Her parents sued on her behalf claiming that her shirt was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States. Here, the courts ruled in favor of the school board, saying that although the shirt displayed an anti-drug message, the word “suck” was considered a vulgar word with a sexual connotation and therefore not allowed in school because it interfered with the classroom learning environment. Id. at…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts In December of 1965 fifteen year old Mary Beth Tinker, sixteen year old Christopher Eckhardt, and a group of other adults and students gathered at the house of the Eckhardts’ to hold a meeting. At the meeting the group of people decided to support their truce to what happened during the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands during the holiday season. The principle of Des Monies School (the defendant) found out about the plan and held a meeting to that created a policy that any student wearing armbands would be asked to take them off, refusal to do so would result in suspension. On December 16, 1965 Mary Beth Tinker (the plaintiff) and Christopher Eckhardt wore black armbands to school, and were sent home.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defenders of the confederate flag claim that it represents "heritage, not hate." How can any good come out f a flag that has caused an immense negative impact? the confederate flag represents a split in our nation and symbolizes discrimination, therefore it should be banned. Continuing, the flag has also caused violence and inequality.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this research paper I will be discussing the controversies with the Confederate Battle Flag known today as the “Rebel Flag” and the “Beauregard Battle Flag”. In this paper, you will see the National Association of the Advancement for Colored People (NAACP), this is an organization that helps protects colored people’s rights. I went about researching everything using the internet as my resource. My view on this topic is that the “Rebel Flag” should not be a thing that has as much attention as it has. It is quite offensive and people should be more careful.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    December 1965, a group of students met at Christopher Eckhardt's home and discussed that they wanted to show support for the truce in the vietnam war. They decided they would wear armbands to school to support it, but the principles of the Des Moines school found out about their plan. A new rule in school was passed. That all students wearing any armband would be asked to remove it, and if they refused, they would be suspended. On the 16th of December, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt both wore armbands to school, were asked to remove the armbands, and when they refused, they were send home. The next day, John Tinker had the same situation and and resulted the same way. In response to the suspension, the students sued the school district…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A century and a half ago, our nation faced a civil war. More than 620,000 Americans lost their lives at the hands of other Americans, which was subsequently equal to the total number of American deaths in all other wars combined (O’keefe). The reason for this senseless war, the Confederate States of the South wanted to keep African Americans enslaved. As Southerners fought and killed to defend slavery, they did so under the confederate flag, which consisted of the colors red, white, and blue. Terrorist groups like the Ku Klux Klan and many other white supremacist groups, led hanise crimes against African Americans which included: lynching, burning crosses, and mass murders, while using the Confederate Flag as a symbol of “unity”. A flag that stands for hatred and white supremacy is not only allowed but glorified. The confederate emblem should, not only be taken out of the Mississippi state flag, but the confederate flag should be banned from the United States.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Bill's freedom of expression rights violated in this case? Why or why not? Bill's freedom of expression rights was not violated in this case because the school had already initiated a policy prohibiting the wearing of any gang symbols, which included earrings. "Gang members tend to wear specific apparel or colors to convey gang affiliation" (Essex, 2012, p. 114).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. In favor of the Tinker children, it could be argued that of course since they were American citizens attending an American school, they are entitled to their rights to the same extent that a non-minor not in school is. Because it has been ruled the picketing, a form of protest, is a form of symbolic speech, and wearing these black armbands is also a form of protest, that it should be protected under the First Amendment as well. This is compounded by the Fourteenth Amendment, which extends Freedom of Speech to governments, such as school systems.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This to me just feels like one thing that I cannot waiver both points because I understand patriotism, but when it represents a war over using other human beings, like you and I, for back breaking, hard, horrible, and dirty labor, it just seems unfair to those it offends. In this instance, not only do I decide that it is the state’s right to decide, but that in my honest opinion, that the Southern Confederacy flag shall not be flown in this great nation because of what horrifying events it…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Fortas ruled in favor of Tinker because he viewed symbolic speech as similar to pure speech as protected by the Constitution. The armbands were a passive expression that did not involve disorder or disturbance to school. He believed that the fear of a disturbance was not enough to take away their freedom of expression.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederate Flag

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is where I am unsure about making the phenomenon a law to not allow Confederate flags or names. There are people out there who respect the flag with a passion. These are the Veterans. Veterans believe those names, objects, and the flag are all sacred. They believe they are memorabilia for the past and should be respected. Outlawing all these objects would not just anger most of them but disrespect them too. I remember when someone mention the flag on my grandfather’s hat, a War vet, and he was outraged. We do not need to go as far as banning these items in schools and in the community because we would be disgracing the Vets of our community. I believe we should just keep promoting the idea of taking down and getting rid of these objects to try to satisfy people but not disgrace others. Yes, not taking them down will send a mix message, like mentioned earlier, but we cannot seem to satisfy everyone so to do our best we just promote strongly to not promote these actions and not to have disgraceful objects at public schools were we are supposed to promote a non-segregated…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays