Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Thurgood Marshall Speech

Powerful Essays
1263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thurgood Marshall Speech
Thurgood Marshall delivered a speech on “The Legal Attack to Secure Civil Rights,” at the National Association of the Advancement of Colored People Wartime Conference, in Chicago, Illinois, during July 1944. In the speech Marshall gives an overview of antidiscrimination law and expresses the importance of understanding the laws in place to protect the civil rights of black people, by enforcing the civil rights statues. In the speech he outlines solutions for various forms of discrimination and stresses the importance of people bringing their complaints to the attention of lawyers’ so that federal officials are made to enforce the statues set forth. In Thurgood Marshall’s speech at the NAACP Wartime Conference, he maintains that a legal strategy is necessary to secure full civil rights and that blacks in particular, must avail themselves of statutes of the United States to protect their fundamental rights as free American citizens.
Many people know Thurgood Marshall as the first African American Supreme Court justice. Born in Baltimore, Maryland, in 1908, Marshall was raised in segregation and believed himself to be a Southerner. Upon graduation from law school he opened a practice in Baltimore. With limited opportunities for African Americans during the Depression, he became member of the local NAACP branch in an attempt to spread his name in the community. From 1938 and into the early 1960’s Marshall, beginning at the age of 32, served as the chief attorney for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and directed litigation for the advancement of legal rights for African Americans. He argued several civil rights cases before the Supreme Court, with the most famous case as a lawyer for the NAACP being, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. This case was the corner stone of desegregation in public schools. The Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” did not pertain to public education, because separate could never be truly equal. His victories as a lawyer for the NAACP broke the color line by overturning the “separate but equal” doctrine. Marshall was confirmed as the nation’s first African American Supreme Court justice in 1967, where he served until his retirement in 1991. He died in 1993, at the age of 84.
At the Wartime Conference, early on in Thurgood Marshalls speech, he expresses the importance of antidiscrimination laws and the significance of all people understanding statues in order to protect their fundamental civil rights as American citizens. He explains the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution and defines their significance to protect the rights of all free Black people. The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution passed in the senate, April 1864 and adopted into law December 6, 1865; the amendment abolished the existence of slavery and involuntary servitude within the United States. The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified July 1868, and defined United States Citizenship for anyone born or naturalized in the United States. Additionally, the amendment prohibited any action denying any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law and no person could be denied equal protection of the law. By February 1870, the Fifteenth Amendment has been ratified, establishing equal voting rights for all United States citizens and citizens cannot be denied that right based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Beyond knowing the provisions to the Constitution, Marshall made those attending the speech aware that all blacks must be familiar with the Federal “Civil Rights Statutes,” these include several Acts of Congress, such as the Civil Rights Act as well as, additional statutes in various sections of the United States Code. These statutes are important in that they protect the rights of individual citizens against private persons, as well as public officers.
The Civil Rights Statutes provided rights to all Americans, although they were of specific significance to Blacks in that the statutes provided the only legal protection Blacks had for recourse against those that denied them their rights. Marshall also pointed out that many officials, of both state and federal governments were reluctant to protect the rights of Blacks. He goes on to acknowledge the difficulty to enforce the rights of the people when the statue is clear; although, it is nearly impossible to secure enforcement if there any doubt to the statute and whether it applies to a specific situation.
Thurgood Marshall makes the message clear to those attending the Wartime Conference, that a legal strategy is necessary to obtain full civil rights. Thurgood Marshall is a man of law, he knows and understands the rights of people and encourages the enforcement of the laws set by the United States to prosecute individuals who willfully interfere with the rights of other individuals. This is why he believes it is imperative for all Blacks to be thoroughly familiar with the rights guaranteed them by United States, so they can insist that their fundamental rights as Americans are protected. The point of the Civil Rights Statutes was to place the African American race, in respect to civil rights, on the same level as with Whites. This made the rights and responsibilities, civil and criminal of both Blacks and Whites exactly the same.
Thurgood Marshall acknowledges that although the United States Supreme Court ratified the Civil Rights Act in 1870, more than 70 years later, in the South there were still judges, prosecutors and members of juries that often refused to follow the provisions. Marshall also acknowledges that often Blacks themselves were hesitant to avail themselves protection as granted by the United States Constitution. Marshall’s message to the NAACP community is that it is necessary to carry-out the legal strategy in the fight against discrimination of Blacks. Systematically excluding them from jury service and refusing them the right to vote is a clear violation of their civil rights. Marshall goes on to say, “The responsibility for enforcement of the civil provisions for the rights of Blacks rests solely with the individual.” He encourages the people to make full use of these statues so that equality can be a reality for all people of color.
Marshall address the issue of segregation of residence by race, whereby private owners band together to prevent Black occupancy of particular neighborhoods. This was a growing issue throughout the country at the time. During the speech he laid out the legal ground-work for the people pertaining to the NAACP “all-out attack on restrictive covenants.” The Housing Authority insists they will maintain separate but equal facilities, and the NAACP maintained that separate facilities are never equal in all respects. The NAACP was in favor of public housing but was opposed to segregation within public housing and was preparing a legal course of action.
Marshall, in the speech closing, expressed the importance of additional legislation to enforce both state and federal civil statutes, as well as, continuing to demand justice for statutes already in place. He again reminded the people that, “Persons who deny to us our civil rights should be brought to justice now. Many believe the time is ‘ripe’ to discriminate against” Blacks. “All right then, the time is always ‘ripe’ to bring them to justice. The responsibility for the enforcement of the statues rests with every American citizen regardless of race or color.”

Endnote

Bibliography

Primary Source

Thurgood Marshall. “The Legal Attack to Secure Civil Rights.” (Speech Presented at the NAACP Wartime Conference, Chicago, IL.), July 1944.

Secondary Source

The Library of Black America, Thurgood Marshall: His Speeches, Writings, Arguments, Opinions, and Reminiscences, 1st edition. (Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books, 2001).

United States Constitution. Amendment XIII, XIV, XV.

Bibliography: Primary Source Thurgood Marshall. “The Legal Attack to Secure Civil Rights.” (Speech Presented at the NAACP Wartime Conference, Chicago, IL.), July 1944. Secondary Source The Library of Black America, Thurgood Marshall: His Speeches, Writings, Arguments, Opinions, and Reminiscences, 1st edition. (Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books, 2001). United States Constitution. Amendment XIII, XIV, XV.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    [ 41 ]. Martin Luther King, Jr., (1968) "The American Dream," Negro History Bulletin 31 (5), 10-15…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thurgood Marshall was important because when he was in the Supreme Court Justice he was part of destroying the ground of Jim Crow Segregation. Thurgood and other lawyers went to court to stop segregations of schools. The case was known as Brown vs The Board of Topeka Kansas. Also, he helped abolish the last idea of slavery, freedom of speech, and wealthfare. He was the first African American in the Supreme Court and that changed people’s perspective in the Supreme Court.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a land that promises life, liberty, and prosperity, the spirit of the African American people had been ridiculed and relentlessly robbed of these freedoms as exposed in Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter From Birmingham Jail. Even though our Founding Fathers established these rights to all of the people in 1787 and slavery had been abolished in 1865, a negro’s life did not fall under this covenant of freedom. Hostility and intolerance plagued these times, and someone needed to put an end to the oppression. Too much scarlet red had oozed out of the lives of innocent negro men, women, and children. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of those individuals who rose up and fought for justice and freedom. His letter, Letter From Birmingham Jail, paints…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Correlation and Causation in the Civil Rights Movement The Court’s Casual Influence on the Passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 The Civil Rights movement was a collaborative effort towards equal rights for African Americans. Some scholars argue that the court had direct, causal influence, while some argue that the court had little impact in the passage of the Cvil Rights Act. Expanding on Gerald N. Rosenberg and Michael Klarman’s arguments, I argue that Rosenberg’s analysis of the Supreme Court’s action in the Civil Rights movement was most accurate.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dr. King Speech

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man of many accomplishments. From lighting the torch that helped changed the way we blacks and whites communicated, to sparking the civil rights movement, it's safe to say that Dr. King was well involved in helping change racism. During Dr. King's life, he had written many letters, but none were like the letter he wrote to his fellow clergymen. The letter that King wrote to his fellow clergymen was a reply to the statements made by the clergymen stating that Dr. King's actions were “unwise, and untimely”. Now according to Dr. King, he rarely ever took time to reply to negative backlash he received from others, but this particular criticism made a rather large impact in Dr. Kings life. Upon receiving the criticism, King wrote a very passionate letter stating in so many words that men in their position should have more compassion, wisdom, and positive impacts in America, instead of promoting, and condoning the negative behaviors. While writing this letter to the clergymen, King used a lot of detail, passion, and rhetoric, such as Logos, Ethos, and Pathos which I will convey in this paper. I will show examples of King's use of the rhetoric terms, as well as describe the effectiveness and importance of them.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heffner, Richard D., and Alexander Heffner. "Civil Rights Speech, John F. Kennedy." A Documentary History of the United States. 8th ed. New York: Signet, 2009. 457-62. Print.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1932, the Powell vs Alabama Case reversed the convictions of nine black men who were accused of raping two white women. All the defendants, apart from one, were sentenced to death after a series of one-day trials and they were given minimal access to their lawyers before their trials which meant their defenses weren’t precisely planned. The convictions were reversed because the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they weren't given a fair trial, they were denied legal counsel, and the juries excluded members of their race. This was a significant ruling because the Supreme Court had recognised that African Americans were being treated unconstitutionally, and the little rights that they did have, had been violated. This evidence shows that the Supreme Court was important in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights because the Courts had accepted that African…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time you go through school you have new teachers. They all have different ways of trying to get to know you. But one thing they all have in common, they start by calling roll and sometimes saying someone’s name wrong. Then after that they ask you a ton of question, like who is your favorite person. I said “Martin luther king jr.” because without him the world would have never changed.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Litwack, L. (2009). "Fight the power!" the legacy of the civil rights movement. Journal of…

    • 4532 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Crow

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical context in which this book was written surrounds the events that took place during the Civil Rights Movement. There were several influential legal cases involving race relations. One prominent court case was Plessy vs. Ferguson. This 1896 court case decided that states had the legal right to segregate public facilities. In 1899, the court ruled that schools could only be erected for white children.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People, blacks, and whites had to endure many challenges before, during, and after the Civil Rights Movement . A lot of people had to make sacrifices in their lives to be a part of the Movement. People became unemployed, were abused countless times by the police, southerners, and people who disagree with segregation. They also sacrificed their education, children (teenagers and college students), and their right to defend themselves. Using sources, this essay will show the numerous sacrifices and challenges that were made by Civil Rights activists, and the successes obtained through the Movement.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (2009). “Fight the Power!” The Legacy of the Civil Rights Movement. The Journal of Southern History 75.1: 3-28.…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A Retrospective on the Civil Rights Movement: Political and Intellectual Landmarks." Annual Review of Sociology 25 (1999): 517-39.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The speech “I have a dream” by Martin Luther King is acknowledged as one of the best speeches ever delivered. His escalated rhetoric demanding racial justice and an integrated society became a slogan for the black community. King’s words proved to be the basis for understanding the social and political upheaval at the time and gave the nations people a voice of their own to express what was happening. The key message King hoped to get across in his speech was that all people are created equal and that it must be the case for the future of America. King’s speech was by no means improvised, it was well researched and in preparation he studied the Bible, The Gettysburg Address and the US Declaration of Independence as he alludes to all three in his address. The speech can only be described as a political work of poetry and a well delivered, unintentional, yet beautiful, sermon full of biblical language and imagery. As well as rhythm and frequent repetition, alliteration is a key device, used to hit home major points.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1991, the prestigious Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall announced his retirement (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2). Justice Marshall set the precedent for racial equality in America, putting Clarence Thomas at the opposite end of Marshall’s liberal agenda. At this time, Clarence Thomas was working on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a common “stepping stone” to the U.S. Supreme Court (Clarence Thomas, pg. 2). President Bush had been eager to nominate Thomas to the court, and on July 1, 1991, he afforded him the opportunity (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 1). This was a chance of a lifetime for Thomas. Once Thomas was nominated concerns began to surface. Would there be backlash from Civil Rights committees for his criticism of the Brown v. the Board of Education (Abramson and Mayer, pg. 117)? The Bork hearings had recently ended, and the politics in the air ran thick. The “war over the Supreme Court” within the last twenty years was never more intense than at Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings (“Clarence Thomas”, pg. 2).…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays