Preview

Thomas Hobbes Absolute Authority

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Hobbes Absolute Authority
Hobbes argues that the sovereign’s absolute authority is vital to the self-preservation and maintenance of civil peace of the commonwealth. Without these, there would be civil war and chaos. He believes that the benefits of having a sovereign outweigh the disadvantages, despite the many rights that the sovereign is entitled to. This is why Hobbes believes that those living under the rule of the sovereign still exercise freedom. For Hobbes, liberty is defined as the ability to act in accordance to one’s own will without being physically restricted. For example, being tied up in chains physically disables the ability to exercise freedom and thus hinders one’s liberty. Accordingly, the subjects who live in covenant without any physical restraints …show more content…
Animals live in coherence, yet do not have a sovereign state. Hobbes then questions why men cannot live in a harmonious state of nature. He explores the relationships between ants to understand why men cannot live in the same manner. The first reason comes from psychology. Ants do not feel envy or hatred and cannot be ‘injured’ from an insult. Also, animals do not talk or possess speech; therefore they cannot bring themselves to insult someone. In addition, they cannot lie or mislead others because they lack the ability to do so. This means that ants are not selfish and do not make themselves better off through the means of deception and cheating. For humans, getting ahead is natural because we are rational beings that are innately competitive. Another factor as to why humans are different from ants is that the common good does not differ from the private in an ant society. There are no real cases that arise where one ant’s interest conflicts with that of the community. The ant’s society is much tighter, so any act that is detrimental to an ant is also detrimental to the community. Therefore, what is good for the community is good for the ant. This results in all ants having the same common

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The text states, “be the proclaimed author of everything that their existing sovereign does and judges fit to be done….nothing the sovereign does can wrong any of his subjects, nor ought any of them to accuse him of injustice.” (Hobbes, 2004, p. 80) Hobbes believes that to avoid the state of nature, every man versus every man, an absolute sovereign must govern the people to ensure there are no disagreements. According to Hobbes the absolute sovereign is the starting point of all laws and is given this power by the citizens, the text states “the authority that has been given to ‘this man’ by every individual man in the commonwealth, he has conferred on him the use of so much power and strength that people’s fear of it enables him to harmonize and control the wills of them all.” The sovereign was chosen to represent the will of the people, and knows what is best for…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Hobbes’ mind humans are naturally violent and need to control to avoid any outbursts which would destroy social order (63). People with this thought process saw that the body in power should have complete authority over their subjects with no restraint on their power and no one being able to remove them from their throne. This however is setting a kingdom up for failure as even though some people can be prone to violence, oppressing them with a monarch that controls them too harshly or that are disinterested in ruing a kingdom can cause an even more violent uprising which is displayed in the French revolution. Nonetheless, having a government body put in power is necessary as humans do require leadership and social order but that same government body must be held accountable if there are caught doing any wrongdoings that could severely hinder the progress of the community or create arduous situations to their…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, government is needed so that society will not collapse into violence due to humanity’s selfish desires and self-interest. Hobbes believes that humanity’s natural state is motivated by self-interest and will do everything they can to succeed in their endeavors. People will do whatever it takes to fulfill what their idea of ‘good ’is. When everyone acts this way it quickly devolves into chaos, war, and violence.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes attempts to explain how civil government came to be established. He begins his argument at the most logical place; the fundamental basis of mankind, and makes several key steps in the development of human nature to reach the implementation of a sovereign ruler. Hobbes believes the foundation of mankind is motion. Man is in constant motion and the instability that forms from the collisions that ensue from the constant motion form the state of nature. The state of nature is an inherently dangerous lifestyle, where all members live in a state of constant fear. This fear drives man to consent to a social contract, which establishes a peaceful existence. The social contract is ultimately enforced by the sovereign ruler who uses fear of punishment to ensure man follows the laws created. Man essentially gives up one type of fear for another in an attempt to better human life.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes stated, “the only way to erect such a common power, [. . . ], is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.” As this quote explains, the purpose of state is to create a common law that will to help the people of the state protect themselves from each other. This is because as mentioned earlier, the state of nature for human beings is constant war, with death being the fear of every person and the pursuit of peace the ultimate goal of life. As a result, the common law is the means to this end and therefore all citizens are willing to give their inherent right to themselves to one man or assembly of men in order to secure peace and to avoid violent death. In the absolute monarchy that Hobbes proposes in this book, he does not recognize any limitations to the State and offers no options to appeal to the monarch.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To Locke’s claim that men cannot give away power they do not have, Hobbes would respond that the power of a sovereign “was not given, but left to him” because his power comes from nature, not from the people (XXVIII.2).…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    not necessary for a covenant that would restrict the opinions of people, since people only reason in terms of morals, and moral tend to be the values of the individuals of society. Hobbes believes that the only way to ensure order in society is for the covenant to be established, and only through the covenant can there be order. The covenant for Hobbes is justice and order, since it was a transfer of rights that ended the constant war between individuals, by having them transfer some of their rights in return for security of one’s life. The transfer of rights included things like having a power dictate the laws, and the individual has no say in this, and cannot question it in any fashion.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Locke, as a Christian, believed that God grants us with unalienable rights that, “no one ought to harm another in his Life, Health, Liberty, or Possessions” (Chapter V of Property). Under Locke’s form of government one’s rights are protected most famously written in the Declaration of Independence. Hobbes however did not think that the government had any obligation to protect the rights of its people and “To this war of every man against every man, this also is consequent; that nothing can be unjust. The notions of right and wrong, justice and injustice, have there no place. Where there is no common power, there is no law; where no law, no injustice” (Of the Natural Condition of Mankind as Concerning their Felicity and Misery). With more rights, people will enjoy more safety than simply the protection required by a Hobbesian Monarch. Therefore, these nations organized under the principles of Locke are more powerful by treating their subjects as human beings capable of making good decisions and worthy of natural rights. As it is more enjoyable to live in such a nation, in a time of war countrymen are more likely to willingly fight to protect the nation and rights given to…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an absolute monarchist that believed human beings were organisms that were in constant motion, and needed to have some sort of authority or restraint, so they could be stopped from pursuing any selfish act. In contrast to John Locke were he believed in a democratic rule and constitutes that human nature was identified by reason and tolerance. The political ideology that Hobbes obtains is precise regarding the following points: people are naturally born with rights but must give up any right to the monarch so in return they receive protection, humans are naturally wicked, cruel, inhumane and selfish, no individual can be trusted to govern themselves and cannot maintain order, and the main purpose of a government body is to implement law and order. It is normal to be in a state of war knowing the reality of human nature, being in constant conflict amongst…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have researched on question no.8. The claim of Hobbes that natural law and our natural inclinations cannot bring us to agreement, peace and security without the institution of a sovereign. Why is agreement not enough to maintain a multitude? Why is the institution of a sovereign necessary?…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, Hobbes argues that such a “dissolute condition of masterlesse men, without subjection to Lawes, and a coercive Power to tye their hands from rapine, and revenge” would make impossible all of the basic security upon which comfortable, sociable, civilized life depends. Hobbes understands that there will be a halt in the progress of society if there is no authority governing the actions of people. He mentions in the Leviathan, that there would be “no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; and which is worst of all, continuall feare, and danger of violent…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This contract, a morally bonding agreement, calls for the creation of the commonwealth that is ruled by a single authority, of one that is either elected or taken by force, and most importantly, is empowered by the people (who have given consent). The elected ruler, which Hobbes’ claims should be an absolute sovereign is in its best form as a supreme monarch, with the one sanctioned man ruling and streamlining control to make the system most effective.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sovereign

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Assembly of men, shall be given by the major part the right to present the person of them all, that is to say, to be their representative,” (Bailey 200) this statement, said by Hobbes, explains that a group of men decide on an individual to become their sovereign, therefore that individual is ‘made’ a sovereign. Hobbes’ states that the individuals must agree and covenant with one another in order to decide which individual will become sovereign. By agreement only the men that have chosen the representative can make him sovereign, he has no say in it and therefore the men cannot by any circumstances be freed from his authority. One of the main differences between Canada’s sovereign and Hobbes’ description of a sovereign is…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays