Preview

Thomas Aquinas Ethical Theoretical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Aquinas Ethical Theoretical Analysis
Thomas Aquinas’ ethic theory helps us understand why doping in sport might be considered unethical. According to his principle of Natural Law, “we ought to perform those actions that promote the values specified by the natural inclinations of human beings” (Mizzoni 47). He further develops on four essential human goods: our own life, procreation, sociability and our inclination to understand. Throughout the 20th century, certain athletes have violated some of those goods. When we look at the case of Thomas Hicks we recognize why doping is immoral. This runner put his own life in danger by abusing of a performance-enhancing drug. His behaviors went against the rationale of self-preservation because it caused harmed to his body. He violated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jose Canseco (baseball player) argues in his book, “We (the players) didn’t see performance enhancing drugs as a big deal. We didn’t see using steroids as being in the same category as cocaine, marijuana, crack, or ecstasy” (213). However, using performance enhancing drugs and taking unfair advantages over others is cheating. At the professional and Olympic level, each athlete is responsible for the drugs they consume and knowing if any of these substances are on the World Anti-Doping Code Prohibited list. Using performance enhancing drugs in professional sports is…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Moller's article We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals is showing how easy it is to choose success over rules. It brings in specific examples of when he was in high school he had the option to either get an F on his test or take Ritalin to help him focus and pass the test. The author chose to take the drug along with breaking the rules and law. He compared this to baseball players, how once the players get offered steroids it's obvious they will take them. They all want to be the best and taking these performance enhancing drugs will help them get there.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals,” author William Moller presents his explanation for the widespread use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). Moller begins by telling a story about his past experience with PEDs. During his sophomore year of high school, Moller was under immense pressure from himself and others to achieve a standard of excellence and secure the top spot in his class. After pulling three all-nighters in a row and forcing himself to stay awake for more studying, he willingly took a PED to improve his focus. It was easy for Moller to make the decision of being rewarded with a good test grade and risking the consequences of getting caught, instead of doing the right thing and falling to his competition.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In “The Doping Dilemma”, Michael Shermer writes about the consequences and the ethics behind performance enhancing substances in professional sports. He begins with an anecdote, which describes the feeling of getting “dropped by your competitors on a climb” (420:2). As described by the author in the development of the story, every athlete has a genetic limitation that regular training cannot exceed (421:4). According to Shermer, the only thing to be done is to dope. Arguing that, in order for an individual to stay competitive nowadays, he needs to make use of performance enhancing substances. Shermer concludes that today’s drugs are better, harder to test, and the incentives usually favor them (421:8/422:9). The author effectively argues that there should be a direct shift on the incentives regarding sports doping. His experience read as a reflective narrative to young competitors who are now starting,…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Will Moller Analysis

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cheating, in all forms, is considered deceitful and wrong. However, people still do it hoping the end result is an A on an exam or a better performance, in an athlete’s case. Cheating in itself is like an addiction and follows a domino effect. Once one athlete decides to use steroids, others follow in their footsteps hoping to perform at a higher level. There have always been several athletes who choose to cheat for their own benefit and personal glory. As a result, those athletes are looked down upon for cheating the game and the fans. Nonetheless, people fail to understand the outside factors that influence great athletes such as Barry Bonds and Ben Johnson to use performance enhancing drugs. In his May 5, 2009 article “Those Who Live in Glass Houses” Will Moller, blog writer for The Yankees $, argues that that performance-enhancing drugs should be permissible because the majority of good professional baseball players are forced to take steroids and such, as a result of baseball fans placing players on a pedestal to perform beyond their capacity. Moller makes a good point that fans have some responsibility for athletes cheating because of the pressure fans place on them to perform at an enormously high level; however, there are other responsible parties as well, including coaches, players, and the NCAA drug policy system as a whole.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This would be persistent with resources and a spectrum of alternative performance boosting technologies currently used today. However, in the article, “The Fight Against Doping,” by IOC (International Olympics Committee) president Juan Samaranch, he argues that, “Doping is not only a danger for the health of athletes, it also constitutes a form of cheating which we cannot accept” (190). As the leader of a major organization, Samaranch uses this powerful and passionate statement to show the reader that the IOC takes the issue of performance enhancing drugs in sports seriously and will not grant any leeway. The use of this quote to counter Fry’s point presented in his article has sufficiently persuaded the audience into taking Samaranch side on the topic simply due to the credibility Samaranch has acquired over the years. Overall, Samaranch has done a stand up job utilizing the rhetorical strategy of ethos and pathos in order to strengthen his views regarding the use of performance enhancing drugs in high-leveled…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long before Cal scored the touchdown in the 1982 “Big Game” against Stanford, and before Stephen Curry made a record-breaking number of three pointers in one basketball game, sports was primarily based on natural abilities. Today, sports has evolved to elevate the level of play and performance. Major competitions such as the Olympics manifest the most dominant world athletes. The winners are deemed the best in their sport for their abilities to be biologically and physically gifted and to harness that potentiality. These athletes train strenuously, often ingesting synthetic or natural additives to increase performance. To remain competitive in increasingly higher levels of play, athletes should have the choice of using their natural gifts and/or using performance enhancing drugs. Neither an athlete who has a gene that prompts a superior physique nor an athlete who uses steroids should be deemed cheaters, for they are pushing sports to a new level and creating an equal level of play.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By taking an approach to this using rule based ethical framework we can see all the wrongs within steroid use in professional sports. Some people spend their whole life working towards becoming a professional athlete. They put in countless hours working towards their goal of becoming the best athlete they can naturally and when somebody goes against the rules and uses a drug that enhances performance it is very unfair, but performance enhancing drugs are banned which is the most important thing to consider. If something is not allowed to be used then there is most likely a good reason. When you do Performance enhancing drugs, you are giving yourself an very unfair advantage because you will be able to reach your goals more quickly than others who are not using performance enhancing drugs. On top of this every single sport has banned all performance enhancing drugs. There are many ways that we could fix the problem of athletes using performance enhancing drugs in sports. These athletes spend their whole lives working towards getting better and using an illegal substance to get better goes against every moral they have ever been taught as an athlete.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is estimated that around forty-two percent of professional athletes use steroids. Any athlete who uses steroids goes against the “spirit of sport”, which is based on honesty, fair play, ethics, health, the respect for game rules and the respect for yourself and other participants. Steroid use shows bad sportsmanship and lack of respect, and is fundamentally a contrary to the “spirit of sport”. Steroid use then makes for tainted glory, and questions of whether the win or trophy was actually deserved are quick to…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and Aristotle

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A married couple, both addicted to drugs, is unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years passed. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their favor. The child is returned to them, against her will. Do ethics support the law in this case? Discuss.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Testing in Athletes

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many athletes fail to take their time when making the decision whether to use drugs to their advantage. Unfortunately, athletes may use drugs for therapeutic indications, recreational or social reasons, as muscular aids, or to mask the presence of other drugs during drug testing. However, the safety of an athlete's health is being neglected. Drug use has led to an increased number of deaths, and suspensions of athletes. If failing to recognize drug use in professional athletics continues, all athletes will have to choose whether to compete at a world-class level and take drugs, or compete at a club level and be clean. In sports, athletes, coaches and trainers will try their best to find a way to reach the top level. They not only search for a way to enhance performance, but most of them have aspiring Olympians to train. Athletes also are becoming more venturesome about mixing different types of drug (Marie, 2014). Sports…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A sport that is considered free of performance-enhancing drugs tends to have a good reputation, especially when compared to sports such as cycling and swimming where the use of performance-enhancing drugs is considered rife. By permitting the use of performance-enhancing drugs, the public perception of these drugs, especially surrounding youth, could be flipped, with people believing that it is ‘okay’ and ‘normal’ to use drugs that are very bad for a persons health. Recent statistics from the Health Research Funding organisation show that, among American teenagers who use steroids, 60% were encouraged into practice because of a professional that was taking these drugs. All of these teenagers went on to say that it was the right of a professional athlete to be able to use these drugs, no matter the cost to their…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug use among athletes has become a common action. Many athletes have or still use performance-enhancing drugs. Not all of these drugs are illegal. In fact, many of these products are available at nutrition stores or on the Internet. Performance-enhancing drugs are used to give athletes an edge. Whether this edge is in competition or in self-esteem, consequences play no part. Why would any athlete disregard consequences and consider using performance-enhancing drugs? For many, the possibility of unlimited gains is enough reason to justify disregard to consequences and use of drugs.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas on Conscience

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For Aquinas, conscience is the act of applying our knowledge of good and evil to what we do (or might do). So in order to (naturally) know what is a good action or bad one, one needs to understand how things are naturally ordered by God -- primarily what human nature is and what things it needs and deserves. This order which dictates what is good or evil behaviour is called the Natural Law by Aquinas. God can and does also supernaturally reveal what is and is not in accordance with his will, e.g. the Ten Commandments and Christ's Two Great Commandments. One also needs to apply this knowledge to what one does, and so one needs to be free to act in accordance with what one knows to be the Divine order of things, or not. Our conscience is our realization that what we might do or have done is good or not, but it is not the actual doing or the choosing. On a technical note, for Aquinas conscience is the act of understanding what is right and wrong, though the name may be applied by extension to a habit or power of performing this act of understanding. The virtue of making correct judgments about right or wrong, i.e. appropriate exercises of conscience is called prudence.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prima Secundæ Partis Q.6, A.8 Aquinas discusses whether ignorance causes involuntariness. Aquinas questions this, and he spends most or all of the eighth article explaining this concept. In the context of the text is that involuntariness is to act against one’s will, and ignorance is the lack of knowledge. Both of these terms are somewhat related. Objection two claims that sins imply ignorance and ignorance causes involuntariness. This leads to the idea that every sin is involuntary. The reply to objection two seems to work because the text provides examples of three kinds of ignorance: concomitant, consequent, and antecedent. This kinds of ignorance suggests that not every ignorance declines our knowledge and do not cause involuntariness.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays