Preview

Themistocles: Hero Of The Persian Wars

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Themistocles: Hero Of The Persian Wars
“Themistocles should be remembered forever as the hero of the Persian Wars.” Discuss this statement.

Themistocles should be remembered forever as the hero of the Persian Wars; although, there were other important individuals and factors which also contributed to the Grecian success during the time period of 490BC – 479BC. Themistocles began his successful heroism during the Battle at Marathon. His contribution (although rather small at this point in history) can be discussed as helpful. Themistocles began his noticeable achievements during the time period between the Wars, in which he made valuable decisions in changing the course of the Persian Wars. Themistocles battle strategies and tactics are also recognisable throughout the Battle
…show more content…
Although his contribution to this battle which defined Ancient Greek battle tactics, he was apart of the movement which inevitably saved the lives of the Grecians. More specifically, Themistocles was involved in the Pincer Movement. This battle strategy, designed by Athenian leader Miltiades, involved Athenian soldiers forming a thin front line with a strong rear sides. The idea behind this strategy was that the strongest of Athenian soldiers would stand on the front line and attack, while a greater majority of other soldiers would begin to encircle the opposing army. If it was not for Themistocles (and a great deal many Athenian solders) contribution to this major battle, the outcome of the Persian Wars may have been vastly different. This was Themistocles first small step to …show more content…
Themistocles strategic planning and brilliant mind was set to extreme levels of challenge in which he overcame with charisma. A specific luck factor between 483BC and 480BC was the discovery of silver at the site of Laurium. Initially, Ancient Greece had decided to split the silver vein equally between the citizens of the country. Themistocles was secretly aware of a future uprising from the Persian Empire. His battle tactic was to use the money from the silver to build extensive Triremes – a form of aquatic transportation. A Trireme was a lighter, more mobile way of travel around the seas; as well as providing an efficient method of battle against the Persians. Themistocles knew that the Persian Army out numbered his army 10:1. On water, this ratio would reduce rapidly. In Themistocles mind, it was the only way to resourcefully stop a Persian invasion. Themistocles manipulated his assembly into agreeing this plan by informing them that the Triremes would be used for battle against Aegina; a threatening polis inside Greece. If it was not for this scheming method, Ancient Greece may not be the nation it is today. Themistocles also added to good preparation before the battle through the Oracle at Delphi. The Oracle’s first prediction was of sinister content for the Ancient

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He was the Spartan king responsible for defending the pass at Thermopylae during the second Persian invasion.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae is shrouded in fluctuating estimations and conflicting historic accounts. There is as much myth, legend and mystery surrounding the actual battle as we have historical records for it. Historians from ancient Greece were very biased and so we must find a middle ground between accounts to have an educated opinion of what really happened. The most speculation involves the actual numbers and count of each side; the Greek forces and the Persian forces. Greek accounts say the Persians numbered over a million. Herodotus even exclaims the Persian forces reached up to 2.6 million strong. We know today that this would hardly have been possible and that Herodotus had probably greatly exaggerated in his writings to glorify the Greeks.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were a number of factors that played into the allied greek victory over the Persian forces led by king Xerxes. The first was the Spartans' superior fighting ability and military training from childhood into early adulthood. Spartans, beginning late in the sixth century used a new system governing all of it's citizens from birth.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle Of Thermoplyae

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Battle of Thermopylae started in August of September of 480 BC. The battle lead by King Leonides of Sparta and Xerxes of The Persian empire. The Persians were trying to overtake Greece. In an effort to protect the Greek cities, The Greek Army lead by King Leonides was sent to the Pass of Thermopyle to stop the Persian entry into Greece.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks during the Greco-Persian War manipulated terrain as a force multiplier in many battles; at the Battle of Marathon, Miltiades used the Vrana Valley to prevent a Persian march on Athens, at the Battle of Thermopylae, Leonidas used the narrow, Thermopylae pass to invalidate the Persian numbers, and at the Battle of Artemisium, Themistocles used the Artemisium Strait to aid in his battle against the Persian fleets.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the greatest warriors in ancient Greek time was Leonidas the First. He ruled over the Spartans during the “Second Persian War.” He led in the battle between the Spartans and the Persians, which was called the Battle of Thermopylae. Leonidas’ contributions to Greek society helped many people continue fighting for what they believed in.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By their use of the trireme it helped the Greeks win the war that they fought with the Persians. It was called the Battle of Salamin. The Oracle at Delphi told them that the people would be saved by a wooden wall. The messages weren’t always clear, Themistocles thought that “a wooden wall” meant a wooden wall of boats and wanted to fight and defend them with a wall of triremes. Other people thought the message meant they were suppose to build a wall around the acropolis and keep the army out and the people safe inside. The choice to build the wall of ships was what worked. The Persians broke down the wall around the acropolis and all of the people inside were killed. The wall of ships was what was able to defeat the Persians during the battle that happened in the gulf off of the shore. The triremes were lighter and did better in the waves. They were able to destroy most of the Persian boats by ramming them. This helped them win the battle. After the war the Greek city states all worked together and became strong enough to defend themselves and became a military…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae, which Herodotus recorded in his writing The Histories, was one of the most arduous and notable battles of western history. Herodotus was an extremely significant historian who lived during the 5th century B.C. In this primary source writing, he portrays how Xerxes was superstitious and tyrannical, how the battle informs you about the Spartan culture, how the values of Greek promoted society, and he displayed how significant the Persian invasion was on Greek development, for example, their political and intellectual expansion. The Persian King Xerxes thought he could smoothly invade the Greek mainland, devastating the Greeks because of his army’s prevailing numbers and dominance.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miltiades biggest contribution was to the battle at Marathon which was considered a significant impact on the Persian wars. It was in the battle at Marathon where he showed both witt and skill against the Persian army. He was considered valuable to the athenians because of his former close relations with the Persian army, which meant he knew there tactics and there ways to which they fought in battle. The Athenians made Miltiades 10th Commander to which each day starting from commander one every commander would be given a chance to be in charge of the army. It was Miltiades who saw the fact that the Persian cavalary wasnt their as an advantage and to which could result in victory if the Athenian army attacked early. So Miltiades convinced Calimuchus the Polemarh to confront the Persian army and give him command. Miltiades battle tactics were both thoughtful and strategic as he used what he had learnt about the Persians against them with both ingenious and thoughful ideas. He made use of the terrain by placing his army on the top of the hill so that they had the higher ground and the best spot for when they made there way down hill so they were less tired and exhausted. It was said to be Miltiades who convinced the generals not to use their customary tactics of which hoplites (soldiers of greek cities) normally marched in an evenly distributed phanlanx of shields and spears. Miltiades was the one who had this great idea of attacking while the cavalary was not around. He knew that the Persians had there flanks set out that the strongest soldiers where in the middle of th e flank and the weakest on the outer flanks, so Miltiades devised this cunning plan to swap it around for his army. He made the strongest soldiers as the outer flanks and the weakest in the middle, so when it came to the fight the strongest soldiers could encirle the persian flanks and cause them distress and penick. His other contribution in the battle at Marathon tactics was the fact that he knew…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herodotus was a Greek historian whose work encompassed Western civilization involving conflicts between Greece and the Persian Empire. There were many differences between the Greeks and the Persians. For instance, the Greeks struggled to find freedom during 480 B.C – 400 B.C. They were determined to train their soldiers, especially Spartan warriors, to be brave, courageous, and strong for defensive purposes from Persian invasion. On the other hand, the Persians differed from the Greeks because they believed their Empire needed more power. The Persians exercised gaining absolute power under their leader, Xerxes, by invading civilization west of Asia to strengthen their Empire. Xerxes’ intentions for invasion were also based on vengeance from previous battles for expansion of their Empire. Xerxes motives for invading Greece were tyrannical, and the events that lead the Persian Empire western invasion were based on reckless intentions from a ruthless leader.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strategic Thinking

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Upon the death of Pericles, Nicias became heir to the Athenian defensive grand strategy and embodied its principles; primarily that Athens should not try to expand its empire while still at war. He was head of the conservative party and played such an integral role in the swearing of peace between Sparta and Athens that it became known as the Peace of Nicias. Thus was his…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darius the great

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay is on Darius the great of Persia.i am going to tell you the great achievements of his life and what he has done since crowned king of Persia.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After defeating the Persian army in the battle at Granicus, the army moved south searching for the main force. The main force was led by the ruler of Persia, Darius. The battle happens in a narrow area between the gulf of Issus and mountains on November 5, 333 BC. The macedonian army used its phalanx, and Alexander used his tactics to adapt to the situation. The army had a phalanx in the center, hypaspists on the right, and companion cavalry with Alexander riding with them on the flank. On the left was a mix of heavy and light cavalry, with an infantry in reserve. Far right in the hills, the army had agrarians, elite javelin soldiers, and cavalry. The Macedonian army advances, protecting their flank. Alexander led an attack of the agrarians, and managed to drive off the heavy infantry. Meanwhile the rest of the macedonian cavalry on that flank drove off the persian cavalry. On the opposite flank, the Persian heavy cavalry succeeding in pushing back the weaker cavalry of the Macedonian army. Alexander responded to this by using his infantry. The Macedonians with this infantry put up a defensive line against a possible breakthrough. As the Persian line advanced, placing their flank in the air, they left themselves vulnerable. The Agrarians continued to pursue heavy infantry, while the cavalry turned on the flank of the infantry. Alexander in this moment saw Darius and advanced toward him. He believed that by…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays