Preview

The Validity Of Reason In Aristotle's Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Validity Of Reason In Aristotle's Philosophy
Aristotle states that “the function of man is an activity of soul [based upon] a rational principle” seeming to say that reason is the most fundamental being of a person. We use reason to dictate every single thing we do. Why did someone eat a banana for a snack? Simply because they were hungry and needed to fill that hunger. Why did someone name a state Georgia? King George was the king of England at the time and the wanted to pay him tribute. There is reason behind everything we do whether the reasoning always makes sense from person to person. Nothing is ever done without reasoning. Epicurus would also agree with this view point. In his Principal Doctrines the sixteenth doctrine states, “Fortune but seldom interferes with the wise person; …show more content…
“Unlimited time and limited time afford an equal amount of pleasure, if we measure the limits of that pleasure by reason.” One could argue that this statement is flawed at its very beginning, seeing that in relation to the life span of a human one cannot even fathom unlimited time. If going on that path it can be said that they equal the same amount of pleasure because within the human capacity they are one in the same. Seeing that everything stems back to reason, without reason there would be no pleasure. Personally, I find listening to music very relaxing and a way to express my feelings which brings me pleasure. I listen to music to obtain that pleasure which is the reason behind that action. The same can be said for a person who enjoys skateboarding. They find pleasure when they are able to correctly do a trick or the feeling of being free when they are riding. Reasoning is the only way that pleasure is obtained through that action. Without reason nothing would ever occur which is a teaching believed by both Epicurus and Aristotle, leading to an emptiness of anything. Through both Aristotle and Epicurus one can amass that reasoning is the very basis of human nature. We do what we must and enjoy because of the reasoning behind it. If we are hungry we eat, if we are bored we play a game, if we want to feel happy we listen to our favorite song. Behind every action is a very basic reasoning for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reason-The idea that consistent, logical thinking should be the primary tool used in making ethical decision…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moral system is rational because it is based on principles of logical reason accessible to ordinary persons.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Credibility

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    Overall, I agree with Aristotle when he says that having a good moral character and establishing credibility is an important part of being successful in persuasive speaking. I believe that if someone is passionate and knowledgeable about the topic they are discussing they would be able to establish credibility with their audience. I also agree when Aristotle says that credibility needs to be earned during the speech. However, it would be challenging for a speaker who in the past has been known to not be a credible source for information to change the views of an audience who already has bad judgement of him or her. In vice versa a speaker who has been credible in the past would not have as hard of a time convincing an audience of his credibility.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bcom/275

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sperber, H. M. (2011). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Why Do Humans Reasons?, pp. 34, 57-111.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethical reasoning is the process through which an individual rationalizes whatever action he or she chooses to take.…

    • 5121 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When wickedness rules and flourishes, not only does virtue go unrewarded it is even trodden underfoot by the wicked and punished in the place of crime. That this can happen in the realm of an omniscient and omnipotent God who wills only goof, is beyond perplexity and complaint” (Boethius, 85). Lady Philosophy explains to Boethius that this is not true because of the various perspectives of Fortune. Although Fate my present someone with bad Fortune, it depends on how the person perceives its fortune. Virtuous beings may perceive bad fortune as a lesson and establish their strength in character when bad fortune appears.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Aristotle were both Greek philosophers who contributed philosophies. Socrates believed that all people contained real knowledge within them and that self critical examination was needed to bring this knowledge out. Socrates once stated, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this philosophical idea, Socrates is suggesting that an individual, who chooses to not think about their own actions, does not truly care about their own life. Aristotle believed in the concept of examining individual objects and being able to perceive their form and establish universal principles. These principles did not exist as a separate higher world of reality beyond material things, but were apart of things themselves. Aristotle has stated, “Since human reason is the most godlike part of human nature, a life guided by human reason is superior to any other….For man, this is the life of reason, since the faculty of reason is the distinguishing characteristic of human beings.” Aristotle is suggesting that an individual who logically thinks about their actions before acting on them, are more superior than those who act without thinking because thinking before acting causes less harm and it shows a person who cares for both themselves and others. These philosophical ideas about self examination on thoughts and actions have come a long way. All individuals think in new and advanced ways and frequently think about both consequences and benefits before acting upon ideas.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtue Ethics Theory

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Because it was their determination to base ethics on reason, rather than on superstition or authority, laid the foundation upon which virtually all philosophers who followed would base their ideas and theories about morality.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rationalism Exam

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rationalism is the part of philosophy that our foundation for knowledge is found within reason.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Final Cause

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final cause according to Aristotle is the purpose for an object, for example, the final purpose of a chair would be to sit. This is a straightforward principle when applied to man made objects, because they all have an obvious creator and that creator makes them for a purpose.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume Philosophy Paper

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This can be related to the study of how we are motivated to act morally and the role of practical reason in moral motivation. The role of reason is only to find out which means help achieve a given goal. Our goals are set by what Hume calls the passion and what today is mostly called desires. Reason is the “slave of passion” in the sense that it practical reason alone cannot give rise to moral motivation, but dependent on motivational force. Hume claims that “passions do not refer to external things” [Book 3 pg. 336], but that they are an original existence. In other words, passions are the very…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I for one think that in order to have one form of justification you must have the other, this is because without one another you could never fully classify the forms of knowledge that are at the disposal of the mind. I think this because any person that thinks that one is more important than the other is being ignorant as in order to get a full understanding of things that are more complex than just saying all…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophers have contemplated for thousands of years the purpose of reason and what it is good for. Three philosophers specifically have tried to prove that their theory is the best they are Descartes, Epictetus, and Leibniz. Descartes believes that reason is good for proving God exists and reason shows us we exist. Epictetus believes that reason is useful for proving what good actually is and that reason gives us freedom. Leibniz believes reason is good because it proves the existence of God and helps prove that our universe did not form by accident.…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Argument

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    What is a good argument? Aristotle’s was the first person to have a formal theory for argument. He states that an argument is “When, certain things being so, something else results from these by their being so (either generally or for the most part) – there (in the Topics) this is called deduction, here it is called enthymeme” (Rhetoric I.2, 1356b16–18). It’s very interesting how Aristotle’s saw an argument from very different ways. In my opinion an argument is just the view of things from different perspective. I can’t understand how he can relate many words and concepts to this simple word. As Dr. King ask in lecture, what is a good argument? Is the big question. He combined fallacies, validity and induction to create a good…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Practical reason begins where theoretical knowledge left off: in the realm of scientific knowledge. Aquinas states that practical reason moves from its principals, “the precepts of the natural law”, to it’s conclusion, “matters that are to be more particularly regulated” (627). The precepts of the natural law is the eternal law of God as it is discovered by human rationality, that is to say theoretical scientific…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays