This is mainly seen by the schoolmasters and the sophisters throughout the book. Memorization is not how Rabelais believed the intellectual individuals in society to act. He was a strong believe in the understanding of knowledge, which he felt was how a person should learn. For example, Gargantua is given “ a sophister-doctor, called Master Tubl Holoferns, who taught him his ABC so well that he could say it by heart backwards “( 1.XIV) This master was focused on memorization rather then analysis, he would force Gargantua to memorize text from the era's famous authors “...read unto him the book de modis signficandim with commentaries of Hurtbise, of Fasquin, of Tropdieux, of Gualhaut, of John Calf, of Billonio, of Berlingunandus and a rabble of others “(1.XIV) .Gargantua never learns any of the material he is taught from his teacher, he is only able to memorize it, causing him to be unable to understand the …show more content…
Rabelais is an advocate of a humanistic approach and he uses Ponocrates to translate these thoughts and ideas to the reader “...he might understand by what means, in so long time, his old masters had made him so sottish and ignorant” (1.XXI). The old masters that Ponocrates criticizes are the masters of the renaissance and medieval era. As a humanist Rabelais is more concerned with human values, with witch he was able to show by Ponocrates. “Ponocrates was of opinion that they should make this fair orator drink again; and seeing he had showed them more pastime, and made them laugh more than a natural soul could have done (1.XX). The criticisms made by Rabelais are an accurate way to portray the flaws in education in the times. Rabelais satirism of memorization, is a slur for the medieval thinkers. He continues to target this era throughout the book how. Once a humanistic approach is added to the book, Gargantua starts to become wiser. Rabelais believed that humanistic approach would be more suited for understanding the