Preview

The Turning Point in Richard Iii

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Turning Point in Richard Iii
The Turning Point alex thorn

The crowning of Richard III marks the turning point from his rise into power to his demise. Up until he becomes king, Richard is the underdog – albeit, a ruthless and evil one. Thus far, the entire play has been focused on Richard's attempts to assume power and seize the throne. However, once he becomes crowned King Richard, the focus of the play shifts to Richard's attempts to maintain power and hold the throne. Essentially, the challenge for Richard is no longer gaining power, but keeping it. It is this new struggle that, ultimately, redefines his allies and, more importantly, changes both Richard's personality and the audience's sympathy for him.

Richard begins the play not only as an inspired, determined underdog, but he is also cursed with a terrible deformation; the audience is sympathetic and sees Richard, despite his inherent evilness, as the aspiring hero. Midst his self-loathing, Richard also defines himself as an outsider because of his deformities, which helps the audience sympathize with him (it's hard to hate someone who hates himself). Even before the play begins, Richard had planned his takeover of the throne. His brother, Clarence, the sickly King Edward, and Edward's two sons all stand in his way, but Richard remains undeterred and ambitious. For the next three acts, Richard, the underdog, conspires and deceives – seemingly smarter than all the other characters – to get closer and closer to the throne. Richard is confident and successful, constantly boasting about his intellectual superiority over those characters whom he deceives. He allies himself with Buckingham, who proves to be a valuable right-hand man. Throughout his rise to power, Richard uses his keen ability ("keep [his] friends close, but [his] enemies closer") to knock off Clarence and Hastings. As he comes closer and closer to the throne, it is his mental superiority, confidence, underdog status and his honest view of his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard appears to evolve from his initial condition throughout the story following the constructive reactions from his community, and close to the end, the introduction of Shawna, reaching an ostensible stability. Therefore, the main character is dynamic, he suffers a complete shift in his behavior that is clearly portrayed in the way he narrates his experiences with his friends and Shawna. Richard illustrates himself in different circumstances that give the reader different sides to his current life. He is an addict; however, he does not fulfill all the stereotypes of one, he is also browbeaten, which seems to be normal in his current life because of the way he expresses the event in which he is being robbed. Nevertheless, the reader sees him as a friend and a lover once the melioration begins. Because of this, his development as a character is round, he is battling in some of his sides as narrated during the introduction, though, he starts to find relief in some of his others. The beneficial development on Richard as the story moves forward supports the story’s…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare depicts Richard’s duplicity through his soliloquies and asides as they reveal his multifaceted and deceptive nature. Richard’s oratory skills, whilst they are revealed to be witty, as he is shown to use intelligent word play, irony and stichomythia, he is ultimately cast as the Machiavellian character from the outset of the play “determined to play a villain”. Richard puts the blame on his appearance for the immoral acts he commits “deformed, unfinished, sent before my time” and uses it as an excuse to be power hungry. Richard’s duplicity is highlighted when his brother Clarence is sent to the tower to be murdered. Any sympathy elicited from the audience in the opening soliloquy is undermined immediately by the deeply…

    • 1317 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout King Richard III, the value of kingship is one that is explored greatly. The play’s message about kingship is not only seen through Richard’s deceptive schemes but it is also through the fall of his reign where his conscience begins to show, resulting in the destruction of his power. Not only is Richard’s poor kingship seen through his own realization, but it is also seen through other character’s perception of Richard’s reign. Richard’s poor kingship can be seen through Richmond’s expression of Richard as ‘A base foul stone made precious by the foil of England’s chair, where he is falsely set.’ In this quote, Richmond metaphorically describes Richard as nothing more but a worthless rock only made to appear like a gem because of the throne in which falsely claims. It is through this metaphoric description of Richard as a worthless rock that we are able to comprehend what little skills Richard possesses as a king. The highlighting of Richard’s poor kingship not only helps us to comprehend his devious ways but also understand the importance of the value of kingship throughout one’s reign.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's play, it is easily seen that power is central as the whole situation that the characters find themselves in is due to a struggle for power, a fight for the throne. The civil war between the houses of York and Lancasters has been won ‘by this son of York’, King Edward, Richard’s brother. In the opening soliloquy Richard says ‘…since I cannot prove a lover/ To entertain these fair well-spoken days, / I am determined to prove a villain’. It is not only Richard who thirsts for power, but also Buckingham and the Woodvilles. Buckingham chooses to politically align himself with Richard for his gain, apparent when he asks Richard for the promised earldom of Hereford. He ignores Margaret’s warnings about Richard and continues to support him. He also enjoys acting almost as much as Richard, seen in Act 3 scene 5 when he tells Richard he can ‘counterfeit the deep tragedian’, and ‘I will play the orator’…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Richard III – does conscience, acting and deception shape identity? Is Richard merely a creation of God’s divine will, or is he a cold hearted villain?…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Richard III and Looking For Richard are compositional products that directly correlate to historical and social contexts respectively, the latter drawing on the former’s challenge to the context in which it was written. Shakespeare’s late sixteenth century play was crafted in a turbulent time of rigid political and religious adherence, and written under the weight of sectarian distrust and forced political alignment to the reigning Tudors. Thus, Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard as a Yorkist focus’s on his devilish and Machiavellian nature. Written eight decades earlier, Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince asserts that an effective ruler should abandon traditional Christian virtues and morality to grow in power at any cost: ‘Politics have no relation to morals.’ This view of power and politics indicates a shift to a secular notion of leadership. Richard is, to a degree, a Machiavel; he calls himself a devil, ‘Thus like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word.’ (III.iii.82–83) This play is weighted with rigid historical context, but also challenges the notion of providentialism through Richard’s determination to ‘prove a villain.’ There is also a challenge in Pacino’s Looking for Richard for the modern audience, and…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s play King Richard III and Al Pacino’s documentary Looking for Richard are two text composed more than 400 years apart that can be linked through their themes and techniques. The influence of these themes or values however, is subject to the context of the audience. Both texts explore the characterisation of the main character Richard and how he is presented. They explore the craft of performance, presenting two different approaches to acting and ownership of the actor. The theme of ambition is also prominent in the opening scenes of the texts as audience members are both implicitly and explicitly presented the objectives of the composers and Richard throughout the productions. Due to the mediums of the texts these themes are conveyed using different devices available to plays and documentaries respectively. Shakespeare relies of soliloquies and strong religious reference to establish the importance behind Richard’s plots, the over dramatic representation of Richard as a deformed cripple insights humour and alliance with Queen Elizabeth. Al Pacino instead uses voxpopuli and explanations of the play, as it develops to ensure audience members are able to understand Shakespeare’s intended purpose in a contemporary setting. The storyline is also altered through certain omission and additions highlighting certain aspects of the plot to suit his objective. It is important also to note the differing purposes of the two texts when considering not only links between them but also their differences.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In KRII, Richard’s evil dual personality was an inconceivable concept to the Elizabethan audience. They viewed Richard as a renowned villain of history during the War of the Roses, and only as a villain within the play. This allowed no room for tragedy, as they did not sympathise with Richard. Richard’s villainy was also further emphasised in his physical deformity, hinting at the corruption of the mind. Richard is seen as the vice of morality plays, and an example of the Christian devil in how he acts and constantly reminds us that he is “…determined to prove a villain” [Act 1, Scene 1] in his soliloquies and asides.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reflecting Elizabethan moral absolutes, Shakespeare acknowledges that a capacity for deception, manipulation and the quest for power is central to the human condition and clearly delineates the complex nature of evil in the character of Richard. Shakespeare dramatically portrays Richard’s villainous intentions and motivations to the Elizabethan audience in the opening soliloquy announcing- “he is made villain” to “usurp” the throne like a symbolic “usurping boar” being physically and morally “deformed” by his craving for power. Subsequently, Richard uses his guises as a tool for deception; he is a passionate lover desperately “wooing Lady Anne” yet a conniving murderer killing her husband, also ironically appearing to be a “loyal loving brother” by eradicating “George” himself. Shakespeare then reaffirms the results of human’s corruption and insatiability for power to the Elizabethan audience as he “proves a villain” must “fall prey to his” own “subtle and treacherous”…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power In King Richard III

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The ends justifying the means” is a principle in ‘King Richard III’ where the protagonist Richard, a Machiavellian leader, lusts for personal power causing a complete lack of moral integrity. The extent of his consuming desires…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard tried to end the war of the roses and placate the Lancastrians by honouring Henry VI through a ceremonious reburial, and by trying to build bridges with the Woodvilles by persuading Elizabeth out of protective sanctuary and to attend court whilst paying her an annuity (Elizabeth was born into a Lancastrian family and did marry a minor Lancastrian noble before marrying the Yorkist king). He tried to end the war of the roses because they were unpopular with the kingdom and the nobles. This is a clear demonstration of how he could have been a great king. This is because he is trying to win over defected supporters and gain trust, popularity and an affinity with as many people as possible. It also shows how he tried to gain affinity with the nobility by gaining trust and showing respect to the Lancastrian history.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the opening soliloquy if King Richard III, the audience is introduced to and captivated by the actor Richard, an antagonist who wields his skills of theatricality and language to strengthen his villainous intentions of marching towards political power: the throne of England. In his Elizabethan context, Shakespeare was the leading figure in the entertainment world, a man who recognised the value of theatre to entertain and educate. He was aware that his audience were well acquainted with the Tudor myths and conventions of theatre and thus, it was within his interests to draw a well-considered line between being artistic and politically astute. In doing so, he allowed Richard III to embody the tension that existed between the more conservative, divinely sanctioned principals of God with elements of emerging Renaissance humanism that suggested an individual could actively engage in self fashioning their own destiny. This would allow Richard III to “clothe his naked villainy” and in turn, foster a charismatic connection that would see him confiding and…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays