Preview

The Trolley Problem: An Ethical Dilemma

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Trolley Problem: An Ethical Dilemma
The trolley problem is an ethical dilemma that was developed by an English philosopher Philippa Foot. It was designed for the purpose of analyzing how people make ethical decisions in critical situations.
The trolley problem describes a trolley that is moving on tracks with non functioning brakes and there are five people tied to the tracks ahead of it. There is also a lever that switches the direction of the tracks in the way where only one person is tied to the tracks. The problem asks people to make a decision to either not do anything and let five people die, or pull the lever and, therefore, save five lives and kill just one. Under these circumstances, most people chose to save five lives and, by doing so, their decisions are considered utilitarian. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that cares about the
…show more content…
They also make these decisions depending on how much harm will be made to themselves. People who chose not to push a person under the trolley, probably think that they will be criticized a lot more than in the switch decision situation. The probability of them making non utilitarian decisions increases when the same questions are asked and people are told that they will have to kill one of their relatives or themselves.
The trolley problem is also often described when talking about the development of self driving cars. This type of cars will have to make choices based on what they are programmed and, if we look at the trolley problem, these choices may raise many questions. When asked if the car should kill the public or the driver, most of the people say that the car should kill the driver, if they are not drivers themselves. At the same time, when they are asked to think of themselves as drivers, people make non utilitarian decisions and say that they would chose the public to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Trolley Dilemma is a thought experiment where there is a runaway train and it is heading down the tracks towards five workers you cannot directly do anything to stop the train, but you happen to be standing by a lever that will switch the tracks, only problem is there one man on the other track. And by pulling the lever you will kill him only instead, so you kill one as an alternative to killing five. The other scenario is, imagine you are standing on a bridge seeing all of this happen and you by chance notice a very fat man standing on the bridge with you, he is leaning over the edge and you know that if you…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In " Will your driverless car kill you so others live?" author Eric Schwitzgebel argues that driverless car may make crucial desions when in conflict, that may risk your life. He targets the audience, by putting them in this type of situation, discussing the dangers the cars would bring to its passsengers. Schwitzgebel contradicts his argument by stating that self driving car may actually be useful for young teens who can not keep their eyes on the road.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism = an ethical philosophy that says the most ethical decision or course of action is the one that maximize utility.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting to choose who lives and who dies? This is the reason I fell in love with the Trolley Theory during one of our lectures. The Trolley Theory is an ethical experiment commonly discussed and analyzed by philosophers. In the experiment, you must decide if having a single person die in an accident is better, or worse than having five people die in an accident. In this paper I will talk about the Trolley Theory as well as the “Fat Man” theory which is based off on the Trolley Theory.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The trolley thought experiment challenges the mind in such a way that would lead someone to say it defends utilitarians. This is only due to the sense that in a trolley thought experiment using utilitarianisms perspectives of max utility and morality does save five people's lives which does inevitably end one in terms of making the best possible moral decision with such haste can be better. However, some may believe that this critiques the utilitarian. This is only based off the idea that the rapid decision making of the utilitarian where one believes that had he not changed the primary course or target of the trolley with such haste then the events currently unfolding after would not be taking place. This can only mean that if the unbeknownst…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this essay will be discussing the trolley problem devised by Philippa Foot, and exploring different aspects of utilitarianism in relation the situation. The trolley problem is as follows ‘A train is hurtling down a track and you see that it is going to hit a group of 5 people and will certainly kill them all. However you are standing on a bridge over the line next to a fat man and you are sure that if you pushed him onto the line his bulk would be sufficient to stop the train before it hit the group of people, would you push him?’.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the philosophical idea of doing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people. It removes human values and emotions from the decision making process. It is more or less a numbers game.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All engineers dream of creating something that is revolutionary; self-driving cars are a dream slowly becoming a reality. In Neil McBride’s (Sept 2015) article “The Ethics of Driverless Cars” published in SIGCAS Computer & Society, he declares that he believes our society is not ready for self-driving cars. In Milos N. Mladenovic’s and Tristram McPherson’s (August 2015) article “Engineering Social Justice into Traffic Control for Self-Driving Vehicles?” published in Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015, also agrees that we aren’t ready for self driving cars just yet. Although many agree that we are not ready, there are also others whom believe the opposite because of how much safer driving cars would be without humans.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utiliarianism

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, usually defined as maximizing happiness and reducing suffering. Utilitarian ethics emphasizes the consequences of our acts. From the utilitarian perspective, there is no mystery about ethics; the right act is simply the act that produces the greatest balance of pleasure over suffering.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the view that an act is right if it equals the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians describe moral actions as actions that boost something good and lessen something that is bad. Virtue, knowledge, and goodwill are all good but they are only good if they give people a pleasurable existence. Pain is the only thing that is intrinsically bad. Utilitarians focus on the result of an act instead of the inherent nature of the act. An example would be an individual throwing their garbage into the ocean. Utilitarians would say throwing garbage into the ocean is not necessarily bad, but the effect it leaves will cause harm sooner or later and that is what is bad. I do not think that utilitarianism can be an ethical theory. It is simply too difficult to determine whether the utilitarian theory can be justified. The dilemma of trying to focus on a positive outcome or focusing on the actions that we take in order to accomplish the greatest good is too hard to measure.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zach Scriven Mr. Belmont College Composition 1 1 November, 2016 Argumentative Ethics of Self Driving Cars Self-driving cars only been practical since the early 2000’s, but the need for a self-driving vehicle has existed since the first horse drawn cart. Many types of self driving vehicles exist, including the already mentioned car to large industrial mining machines and farm equipment. Since the self-driving car is now practical and already being tested on open roadways, the moral implications of autonomous cars are coming to light. One of these issues is who the computer in the car should be programmed to save, the driver and other occupants of the vehicle, or pedestrians and other drivers.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Doing the Right Thing

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car hurtling down the track at sixty miles an hour. Up ahead you see ve workers standing on the track, tools in hand. You try to stop, but you can’t. The brakes don’t work.You feel desperate, because you know that if you crash into these ve workers, they will all die. (Let’s assume you know that for sure.) Suddenly, you notice a side track, o to the right. There is a worker on that track, too, but only one.You realize that you can turn the trolley car onto the side track, killing the one worker, but sparing the ve. What should you do? Most people would say, “Turn! Tragic though it is to kill one innocent person, it’s even worse to kill ve.” Sacri cing one life in order to save ve does seem the right thing to do. Now consider another version of the trolley story. This time, you are not the driver but an onlooker, standing on a bridge overlooking the track. (This time, there is no side track.) Down the track comes a trolley, and at the end of the track are ve workers. Once again, the brakes don’t work. The trolley is about to crash into the ve workers. You feel helpless to avert this disaster—until you notice, standing next to you on the bridge, a very heavy man. You could push him o the…

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays