Preview

The Sunflower By Simon Wiesenthal: An Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
984 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Sunflower By Simon Wiesenthal: An Analysis
What is forgiveness? Many people have different beliefs about forgiveness. Some believe forgiveness is a virtue, and that they can forgive everything, even if the sin wasn’t done to them. Others believe that it is impossible to forgive a sin that wasn’t done to oneself. In the memoir The Sunflower Simon Wiesenthal asked a question. What would I have done, if I was asked to forgive a person that killed three hundred Jews? In the fifth commandment God says, “You Shall Not Kill” (KJV). I believe it is God’s power to forgive or not forgive a person that has killed another human being. In implying this, I believe I would not be able to forgive a person that has killed hundreds of innocent Jews, because I’m not God and I don’t have the …show more content…
Berger, who is the Raddock Eminent Scholar and chairman of Holocaust Studies at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton, feels outraged that an SS man is asking for forgiveness after the terrible crimes he has committed against innocent people. Alan believes that Simon should and could not forgive on behalf of those so cruelly murdered. Berger states, “I may forgive one who has sinned against me. I may not forgive one who has taken the life of another” (119). What Berger is reminding us is that Simon had no right to forgive someone’s sins against other people, but he knew that if the soldier had done wrong against him, he would have forgiven him. Karl was only asking for forgiveness not because he had changed his mind about the stereotypes of the Jews. But, because he knew he was going to die in any minute and all he wanted was to die in “peace.” How can a man like Karl, Hitler, and all those SS man live and die in peace? In other words, “Do not forgive someone for whom forgiveness is forbidden” (119). I agree with Alan, because Karl hasn’t learned anything, his only desire is to clean his own soul at any cost. If he really wanted forgiveness he should have had confess his crime to a priest, because no one has the right to forgive someone who has taken the life of another human being. Only God has the right to do that. Every person is responsible for his/her own actions, and no one is able to absolve a sin that hasn’t been done to …show more content…
Berger and Telushkin response were in agreement. How could Wiesenthal forgive crimes committed against others? I agree with them, it is just impossible to forgive a crime that has been committed against someone else, only God can do that. It is also impossible to forgive someone that even at the time he is asking for forgiveness, he is still saying that Jews were guilty to when the SS man says, “those Jews died quickly, they did not suffer as I do. They were not as guilty as I am” (52). A more righteous man who really had felt sorry for what he had done, would have said, “Don’t I deserve to suffer for what I have done, while those Jews didn’t deserve such sufferings; they were innocent victims of my comrades and myself” (263). Telushkin is reminding us is that when Karl was pleading for forgiveness, he wasn’t regretting what he had done to all innocent people. He was still feeling superior than all those innocent Jews. I have learned from my religion that if you are able to forgive but you never forget what has been done to you, it’s like you never really forgive that person, it is very clear that Simon didn’t forgive the soldier, because he felt that he might never forget for all the cruel moments that he and his religion went

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his excerpt, A Plea for the Dead, Elie Wiesel discusses the inability of those who were not directly a victim of the Holcaust to truly understand it in its entirety – all encompassing its emotional, mental and physical ramifications. Anecdotally, Wiesel discusses a conversation with a judge from the Eichmann trial, in which he questions, “given your role in this trial, you ought to know more about the scope of the holocaust than any living person…do you understand this fragment of the past, those few pages of history,” (pg. 143) to which the judge replies “No, not at all. I know the facts…but this knowledge…has nothing to do with understanding” (pg. 143). Fundamentally, this introduced an inconvenient reality when discussing the Holocaust:…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The readings over Bonhoeffer and the Confessing Church challenged my understanding of grace and murder. I was shocked that as steadfast Christians and instructors of the word Bonhoeffer and his co-conspirators were fine with the consequences of killing Adolf Hitler, even if that meant spending an eternity in hell, to save the millions being killed in the Nazi concentration camps. In the church I’ve learned the ten commandments and here at Abilene Christian University I’ve studied over Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Because of my studies, I know God says, “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13, ESV) and Jesus says, “‘But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the war the Jews were killed without hesitation by the Nazi’s. If people, like Oskar Schindler, had done nothing the Jewish population would have been much smaller. Ideologically, whoever wrote this source assumes not only that Oskar Schindler is a good man, but also that there is a such thing as a good person. The Bible says that all men are evil sinners at heart in saying, “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”. The source is written by a left wing person it would seem because they are assuming that some people are good (good from birth and then you control if you are evil or not) while right wing people believe people are born evil. The strange thing is that the source focuses on individual people to do something about a problem and not people as a whole. This source is most likely written by a left wing person who has analyzed the situation that was the Nazi’s and decided that these people chose evil. Also they only way for the people who chose to do good that were individuals, of whom they must accept existed, was for them to act individually, and they did make a difference. Left wing people, such as this source, must accept that there are individuals in the world that make a difference for the better…

    • 773 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simon Wiesenthal takes his readers on a course back in time with his writings of The Sunflower. Simon recollects moments when he was subjected to live in Nazi concentration camps during World War II. Karl, a dying SS soldier implores for forgiveness for his crimes against Jews to Simon. Our main character is conflicted by the request and leaves his readers by asking what would one have done being in his position. Proving an answer to this question can be determined by the analysis of Simon’s experiences and findings of experimenters. Philip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram’s experiments demonstrate the relationship and effects that authority has on subjects. In “The Perils of Obedience”, Milgram applies his analysis of his experiments showing that…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal, Wiesenthal speaks to the reader and states, “You, who have just read this sad tragic episode in my life...and ask yourself the crucial question, ‘What would I have done?’” (98). Wiesenthal was task with the decision of whether to forgive Karl, and 22-year-old SS soldier, for his sins committed against the Jews. Wiesenthal, doesn’t forgive Karl, and I agree with this decision. If placed in Wiesenthal’s shoes, I would not, and could not, forgive Karl for his sins, and crimes, against European Jewry because only God can forgive man for sins against God, but also because Karl never seemed to show any true remorse.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being raised in a Roman Catholic household, I can tell you when it comes to forgiveness I was taught to do the Christian thing. As hard is it might be, I should find it in my heart to forgive those who have hurt me, whether they ask for forgiveness or not. What I had never pondered is the chance that someone might ask me forgiveness for something wrong they have done to someone else. Do I have the right to put them at ease or offer forgiveness? In the book The Sunflower, Simon Wiesenthal, a man who had watched countless of innocent Jews like himself be murdered because of sheer hate, shares his unique story. One that has made me think about the way I view, and use forgiveness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason The German Soldiers and some of Germany’s populations consider Jews as their problem, was because they were people that would be considered an escape, even though they didn’t do anything. The text states “Many times over the years, leaders had turned the Jews into scapegoats.” (3) It’s unfair to turn people into a solution for a problem. Many people thought this was true but since Hitler and his Nazi army were too powerful they couldn’t do anything to stop him. The boys were fighting for their freedom by speaking against the Nazi’s and making it known to the german people what Hitler was doing. They did this by spreading the truth around Hamburg. The text states “It was this mission that had brought Karl onto the blacked-out streets of Hamburg that night in 1941. His job was to distribute those leaflets throughout the city, to stuff them into mailboxes and leave them on park benches.”…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franz Stangl had gone to the institution of Scloss Hartheim where he first began to kill people. Franz had no problem killing humans; he did not think of them as humans at all. In an interview with, Gitta Sereny, he had been asked if he thought of the people as humans. “So you didn’t feel they were human beings?” “Cargo,” he had answered. “They were cargo.” In his own mind he had felt like he did nothing wrong because he thought he was getting rid of cargo. “It had started the day I first saw the Totenhlager in Treblinka. Writh had said ‘What shall we do with this garbage’ I think unconsciously that started of me thinking as them as cargo.” Although he had thought that they were cargo and garbage, he had no reason for killing them except. “They were so weak- they allowed everything to happen - to be done to them. They were people with whom there was no common ground, no possibility of communication- that is how contempt is born. I could never understand how they could just give in as they did.” Franz was simply stating an incorrect fact saying that the Jewish people did not try to fight back and had made it easy for them to be killed. He was very wrong about this since if anyone had tried to stand up or fight back, they would have been killed immediately. He was a man who had mistreated Jewish people thinking of them as cargo and took pleasure in killing…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simon Wiesenthal Thesis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In SIMON WIESENTHAL: 1908 - 2005; He would never let us forget the St. Petersburg Times mentions, "When we come to the other world,'' Mr. Wiesenthal said he responded, "and meet the millions of Jews who died in the camps, and they ask us, "What have you done?' there will be many answers. "You will tell them, "I became a jeweler.' "Another will say, "I smuggled coffee and American cigarettes.' "Another will say, "I built houses.' "But I will say, "I didn't forget you.' '' (times). Therefore, Wiesenthal is mentioning in he’s phrase that dead needed justice and a voice to go after those who have caused the pain, suffering, and inhumanity things to the millions of innocent lives taken in vein in which justice will one day be served to…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Cole

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Berger, Rebecca Goldstein, Rodger Kamenetz, and Arthur Hertzberg are all against forgiving Karl, their reasoning’s behind non-forgiveness vary. Alan Berger provides various reasons. First, he questions the repentance of Karl and ponders on if it’s genuine or not. He provides a valid reason to not forgive: the beliefs of Judaism followers. Additionally, he also feels Karl perpetuated the Nazi stereotype and expected to cleanse his own soul at the expense of a Jew. Robert Coles, however, believes that Simon does not have to forgive, but he must be prayed for. He agrees with Berger’s idea that Karl spoke in the name of all Jews, not just Simon (page 137). Rodger Kamenetz is on the same page in that he believes Karl did not address Simon as a person, rather a Jew thus removing any individualism left in Simon. Rebecca Goldstein also feels that Karl does not have the right to die in peace because he does not provide each Jew with the individualism deserved. She provides a valid comparison of the Nazi’s thinking Jews are like water. She states,…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sunflower, by Simon Wiesenthal, was an intriguing and thought –provoking novel that raised many questions on the theological and moral concept of forgiveness. Furthermore, it delved into the matter of whether an individual has the right to forgive in the name of others, or whether forgiveness of the perpetrator was even deserved in the first place. The narrative is told from the first person point of view of Simon Wiesenthal, a young man in his 30s, imprisoned in a work camp. He tells his story of a dying Nazi’s plea for forgiveness and his own subsequent actions. After we hear his story, we can read the opinions of many individuals that tell what they would have done in Simon’s place, and add their own insights into the discussion. Before we delve into the specifics of what I would have done in Simon’s place, and which contributor I can relate to most, I would like to discuss the concept of forgiveness, and what it means to me.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machete Season

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosopher Paul Ricoeur posed the question, how “can one forgive someone who does not admit his guilt?”(Hatzfeld 195) Whether this admission of guilt is enough to be forgiven or not, the “sincere” taking of responsibility for one’s actions is an absolute minimum in striving for forgiveness. Ricoeur’s question becomes especially relevant when discussing the Rwandan Genocide of 1994, in which the Hutu perpetrators, who killed hundreds of thousands of Tutsi, are now seeking forgiveness for their actions. In Machete Season by Jean Hatzfeld, a close-knit gang of such Hutu genocide perpetrators was interviewed concerning their role in the genocide as well as their views concerning regret and forgiveness. While a majority of those interviewed admit their guilt in killing the Tutsis, their lack of remorse makes their apologies and actions largely unforgivable. This insincerity can be seen through their selfish concerns and motives, emphasis on receiving forgiveness from God rather than those victimized, and vision of a return to a completely unaffected future.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simon Wiesenthal Analysis

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When retelling his early training experiences, Karl says, “We were told time after time we must be prepared for great doings. Each of us must show himself a man...He must be tough. There was no place for humanitarian nonsense”(Weisenthal 35). Karl is directly being told to prove his manhood, as being amongst others Karl wouldn't want to be perceived as weak. He was made to believe that his actions were justifiable due to a bigger cause and man would feel encouraged to partake in “great doings”. As a result, readers identify how Karl’s development as an SS was heavy influenced by his commanders. Milgram’s article provides insight on Karl's mentality by stating, “ The subjects do not derive satisfaction from inflicting pain, but they often like the feeling they get from pleasing the experimenter They are proud of doing a good job” (Milgram 75). This statement says that subjects aren’t satisfied by the pain of others, but rather fulfilled by the completion of their tasks commanded by experimenters. Milgram reasons that subjects have a hard time releasing authority because they believe they are making the experimenter content by executing their commands. Just like the subjects of Milgram’s experiments, Karl himself has been a subject in his young SS days and was motivated by the words of his leaders in which he found approval. All these circumstances explain that Karl’s thinking was altered by social ideology which drove him to believe what his actions were…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No matter how bad a crime a person commits, one should still forgive that person when he or she asks for forgiveness. Sometimes people go for the wrong thing because they’re forced to do it just like the dying Nazi. Simon Wiesenthal should have forgiven the dying Nazi because one should forgive but not forget, it is a central tenet of the Jews religion, and there’s no limit to forgiveness.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elie Wiesel, a famed author and survivor of the Holocaust stated quite simply that anyone who witnessed a crime, and did nothing to stop it is just as guilty as the one committing it. Elie Wiesel learned a lot about man's nature by surviving the Holocaust, but his statement about a bystander being just as guilty as the actual criminal is wrong.…

    • 398 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays