The simulation theory offers a simpler explanation for ascription of mental states. We already have the cognitive means for producing action and behavior from input and desire, and we can use this system to produce beliefs about others’ mental states. A complicated tacit theory of human psychology, as proposed by the theory theory, is not necessary for explaining how folk psychology works. For the theory theory to explain ascription of mental states, we must assume that there is a general connection between what the subject does and what the subject believes. From the simulation approach, we can simply put ourselves in the subject’s shoes to determine the subject’s mental states and decisions. With the simulation theory, we can understand a subject’s behavior even if we have not had encounters with this person. The simulation theory also fixes the problems posed by the rational norms approach. Through the simulation theory, we can attribute beliefs to a subject even if there is an inconsistency in those …show more content…
Again, we see the eliminativist making a radical assumption with little evidence to explain why folk psychology must be included in these generalizations. We have no reason to believe that folk psychology should follow the path of other folk-scientific theories. Neuroscientific advancements are still young, and it is perfectly conceivable that we will someday discover the connections between the causal mechanisms of psychology and the folk-psychological concepts of belief and desire.
Overall, the eliminativist objections of theoretical inadequacy and historical science are not sufficient for disproving the psychological attitudes of folk psychology. Folk psychology is an adequate explanation for the human ability to mind read, and the simulation theory, through its diverse applications and lack of complications, provides the most credible explanation as to what enables us to accurately mind