Preview

The Similarities Between Humans And Neanderthals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Similarities Between Humans And Neanderthals
Neanderthals, also known as archaic homo sapiens, that inhabited Europe, Africa,and Asia 300,000 years ago. Controversies have surrounded on whether they were considered modern human when their fossils were first discovered in Neander Valley, Germany in 1856. At first, Neanderthals were considered inferior to Homo sapiens. However, after years and discoveries later, scientists and paleontologists have found they are very much like modern human, but with different physical appearances. When comparing the modern human skeleton to the Neanderthal’s, one would be able to notice some differences between that of a modern human and a Neanderthals. One very notable difference between the two skeletons was that Neanderthals’ were more robust than that of a human, due to the fact that they have been living in colder climate. For an example, compared to the legs of a human, Neanderthal’s were more huge, but identical to that of a human (Hard Times). Most of the robustness in arm bones are shown in the muscle and ligament attachment area. That area was joined by their massive trunk and limb bones, which only a few modern human could achieve (Trinkaus 58). This meant that the …show more content…
In fact, they were very skilled at it. Neanderthals used and crafted tools from the Mousterian class. As seen in “Decoding Neanderthals”, Neanderthals sharpened a stone using a process of flaking called Levallois. Afterward, they used pitch, which was created using a complex thermal process, to attach the sharpened stone to a stick (Decoding Neanderthals). This weapon not only indicated that they were excellent craftsmen, but also excellent hunters. Hunting was important to Neanderthals because, without it, they would die out. Research have been carried out to show that meat played a large part of their diet. The chemical signature in their fossils have shown that Neanderthals at the same amount of meat as any carnivore would (Larsen

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jared Diamond discusses how the ancestors of humans began to develop many years ago. Human ancestors began walking straight up around 4 million years ago. Archaeologists called this period of new technology and inventions the Great Leap Forward. After the Great Leap Forward, the human race started to expand its territory. Many humans stayed in Africa and Eurasia for many years.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Families were smaller, due to the fact that the population must stay small. Women and children gathered berries and nuts, while men hunted animals. When agriculture was created there was less hunting so men started to do the women’s jobs.This threw off the balance of equality. More children were forced to do laborious work, and families began to grow. Social classes began to form after agriculture. At this point only two variations of humans existed: Homo erectus and Homo sapiens. These early humans spent most of their days advancing with toolmaking and setting up civilizations around their agriculture.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quality of Bipedalism: Neanderthals walked with a fully upright posture. They remain far more closely related to us than most of the other extinct hominins.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitively, Neandertals possessed a relatively wide range of thoughts and abilities considering their primitive status. It is possible to study the Neandertal mind through studying their daily activities. One of their regular activities was hunting, this is pretty obvious. They needed to hunt in order to survive. But specifically what they hunted, and how they hunted shows a great deal about the workings of their mind. Neandertals mainly hunted big game. Specifically they hunted mammoths, reindeer, tur, gazelle, and occasionally some small animals. For mammals this size it was important for Neandertals to strategize about how they would go in for the kill. They needed to know the lay of the land like the back of their hand and they needed to use the terrain to their advantage. It is theorized that women and children also participated in the hunt, they probably would not do the direct killing but they could have participated by driving the animals or beating bushes to expose game. At the site of La Cotte Neandertals used the advantage of a steep cliff (terrain usage) to drive a herd of mammoth…

    • 1535 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    H. neandertal speech capabilities have proven in recent years to be a task capturing much of the time and research of anthropologist. In the 20th century it was commonly thought that H. neandertal was too brutish and simple to have evolved into modern humans, and had very little modern behavior or capabilities. As the fossil record grew and the technology progressed the scientific community found evidence of modern behavior and possibly speech capabilities, that would portray H. neandertal as the advance subspecies he was instead of the brutish, unintelligent being that had been reinforced through the 20th century.…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Compared with australopithecines and earlier Homo, Homo erectus had smaller teeth, a shorter face, and a humanlike projecting nose. The numerous skulls that have been discovered show a significant increase in brain size compared with earlier hominins. On average, the cranial capacity of Homo erectus was about 900 cc, although its range (750 cc–1,250 cc) overlaps that of modern humans (1,000 cc–2,000…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Denisovan Genome Decoded

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Until recently, most scientists thought that there were only two species of humans (i.e., modern humans and Neanderthals) living in Eurasia in the Upper Palaeolithic (50 – 10 thousand years ago). However, over the past decade several finds have indicated that there were several more. Svante Paabo and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute (MPI) of Evolutionary Anthropology have revealed further proof of this fact with genetics. They sequenced the genome from the bones of an individual that had been found in Denisova Cave in southern Siberia. The results indicated that the individual was not a modern human or a Neanderthal. The new species has been named Denisovans. Together with Neanderthals, Denisovans are the closest extinct relatives of modern humans. It is likely that all three species knew of each others existence and may have even lived together in what is today Siberia. Future genomic comparative studies should help scientists uncover important genetic differences that contributed to the development of modern human culture and technology.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neanderthals have long thought to be lesser than modern humans in many ways, such as intelligence, wit, appearance, and ways of life; however, this is not entirely the case. The first Neanderthal discovered was in the Neander Valley of Germany, where part of a skull and limb bones were present (“Neanderthals | Evolution | Earth Facts,” n.d.). Although this is not the oldest Neanderthal skeleton ever found, it was the first and it led to the discovery and understanding of a whole new species. This species was known to us as Homo sapien neanderthalensis, or for those who believe the differences to be so vast that it should be its own distinct species, Homo neanderthalensis (O’Neil, 2010). Homo (sapien) neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens lived side by side for thousands of years (O’Neil, 2010), but it is speculated that it was because of the advanced nature of Homo sapiens which allowed them to strive and eventually outlive the Neanderthals. Although the Neanderthals eventually became extinct and Homo sapiens strived, there are many similarities in both appearance and behaviour that suggest that perhaps the few differences that exist between the two were the difference that allowed for one species to prevail while the other faded out.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human Worksheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who was the first group who had bodies like ours, lived in social groups, and cared for each other? _Homo erectus_…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characteristic that separates primates from hominids is bipedalism; means walking in two feet. These characteristics can be seen in the skeletal structures that have different traits that are: the pelvis is vertical, the spine is curved in an S shape and the last trait is that the arms are shorter than the legs.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is consequently reasonable to assume that hostility, culminating in a sort of primitive warfare, would have emerged between the two species. Numerous discoveries in both Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens bones seemed to show inter-species violence from injuries including indents in the bones that could only have originated from spear or other projectile heads fashioned with common tool-making means contemporary to the period (Bryner 2009, 1). Examples of Neanderthal mass massacres such as El Sidrón, northern Spain, where evidence of tools being used to cut flesh from bones (Zimmer 2010, 1). give a bleak insight into the everyday struggles some populations may have faced, with constant competition with Homo Sapiens for resources, and some engaging in cannibalism, the idea that the emergence of early modern humans was a majorly contributing factor to their extinction is a highly plausible one. Competitive edge regarding surviving/hunting on the part of early modern humans has accounted for the decline of Neanderthals' during a span of thousands of years (Banks et. al 2008, 1). Early modern humans use of superior weapon technology and supposed domestication of wild dogs presumably gave them the upper hand when it came to hunting fauna, an examination of contemporary sites of Neanderthals and early modern humans with animal remnants…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neanderthal Culture War

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They set the model so that the more culturally advanced a group was, the larger it could grow. Because humans were spreading into Neanderthal territory, it’s likely that those leading the charge arrived in small numbers, compared with the established Neanderthals. Despite this disadvantage, the cultural skills they brought with them could have allowed them to hunt, settle land and otherwise use resources more efficiently than the original residents. Eventually, their numbers would swell, making them even more…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neanderthal Research Paper

    • 2929 Words
    • 12 Pages

    It is known from fossil records that Neanderthals disappeared at almost the exact time that that humans arrived. It has been widely believed for years that Neanderthals were our predecessors, but today we can tell that Neanderthals were a completely different, but almost parallel evolutionary relative. This is known by genetics. The last known Neanderthal fossil dates back to 28 thousand years ago. Before the humans invaded the land, the territory belonged to the Neanderthals. Their brains had completely different evolutionary paths than us; they may have appeared very similar to us, but were, in actuality, quite different. The brain of the Neanderthal evolved differently and not as drastically as that of the human brain. The evolution of the Neanderthals mind hit a plateau, and it is seen in the fossil records that the tools of the Neanderthals remained unchanged for a quarter million years before their extinction. Other than human competition, the main reason for the disappearance of the Neanderthals was a change in climate and landscape. They couldnt survive in an area with a disappearing habitat. They were so dependent on what they were accustomed to, that the transition couldnt be made and the result was an eventual extinction of their species. In the rapidly cooling European areas, humans used their intelligence to adapt, but Neanderthals were isolated to pockets of still wooded areas. One by one, the Neanderthals died…

    • 2929 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One undeniable outcome that all humans share in is our underlying fate, because no matter how much we may detest it or how much we may try to realistically reverse time to extend our existence, every fleeting moment must be cherished because our extinction is looming and our days are numbered, given the inevitable reality and inexorable truth that lies within humans is that we will all perish or die one day, regardless. This same sentiment holds true for the Neanderthals, but it also begs the questions how did they ultimately meet their end, what existential circumstances lead to their downfall, and if Neanderthals possessed at least a minimal amount of astute cognitive intelligence, why did the Modern Humans flourish while Neanderthals ceased…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays