Preview

The significance of President Abraham Lincol

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1000 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The significance of President Abraham Lincol
Mr. Griffith
History 101
16 July 2012
The Significance of Pre-Presidential Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln was the United States of America’s sixteenth president and the most iconic figure in the struggle to end slavery. Lincoln was born in Kentucky, which was part of the South and a Slave state. However, he moved to Illinois in 1830. Lincoln worked as a lawyer in Illinois and even served a term in the United States House of Representatives in the 1840’s. He was a member and leader of the Whig Party and eventually a moderate Republican. He idolized Henry Clay and believed slavery to be immoral, but he believed it needed to be a slow process so as not to uproot the status quo in Southern States. It was his wish for the institution of slavery to eventually be ended, but understood it’s importance to the lives of Southerners. Early in 1854, Stephan A. Douglas routinely introduced a bill to the United States Senate to repeal the Missouri Compromise and allow the locals of the Nebraska Territory to decide whether their territories would be free states or slave states. Douglas’ bill would be enacted, but it would cause a “storm” of protests in the North. Northerners, for the most part, came to despised slavery. Many of them wanted it to be completely abolished, and almost none of them wanted it to expand to the new territories. This caused northerners to unite across party lines to eventually form the Republican Party. The process took about six years to truly unite the Republican Party enough to elect a president. Lincoln, who was still a leader of the Whig Party during the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was appalled by Stephen A. Douglas’ bill and his agenda. Lincoln began speaking out against slavery and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Luckily for Lincoln he and Stephan A. Douglas shared the state of Illinois and Lincoln could actively speak against Douglas and the Kansas-Nebraska Act within days, and sometimes even within hours. Illinois was a pivotal state

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He comes to us, too, as the Great Emancipator who headed the North off to Civil War to free the slaves and subsequently offered his kindred Southerners a delicate and forgetting hand. Lincoln was the man who headed the slaves into the common war and eventually liberated them from the Southerners, whom he'd lended a hand after the war. This is the generally speaking perspective of Lincoln, which isn't fully accurate, and is demonstrated to not be totally right however history, demonstrating that he didn't have totally intensive and reliable perspectives and didn't dependably help nullification. He acknowledged how wrong it was that subjection ought to exist whatsoever in a self announced free and edified republic. Lincoln's emotions of the Declaration of Independence, which inside and out say that all men are made equivalent, disaffirm his nations agreeableness and shared traits around bondage. This at last pushes Lincoln to change his perspectives on subjection, instead of supporting it before and all around the war, while it was vital. Kansas-Nebraska Act -The enactment toppled the old Missouri Compromise line, which rejected subjection from the limitless northern zone of the old Louisiana Purchase domain. The demonstration then built another recipe for managing subjection in the national grounds: now Congress might stay out of the matter, and the individuals of every region might choose whether to hold or bandit the organization. This gesture toppled the Missouri Compromise which had awhile ago avoided region in the Louisiana Purchase domain and besides counteracted Congress from mediating, permitting the individuals to take care of their own issues with prominent power. This gesture advanced Congress' freedom to its nation and made it recoil and provided for it no force in the bargains and contentions its nation was managing and additionally left open a yawning opening of chance for professional bondage control. At that point in 1857 came the notorious Dred…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska act is best understood as the breakup of the democratic party. It was introduced in January 1854 by Stephen Douglas. He was a democrat senator from Illinois. He was trying to help the country spread westward to place himself for national power. to figure out a way to overcome the sectional disputes that were remaining in the aftermath of 1850, trying to do so to organize the territories between Mississippian river and the pacific coast. His main goal was to overcome all the debates about the future of slavery. His solution was Popular sovereignty, this meant that the citizens of each new territory would decide whether slavery was permitted. This violated the principle of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that said all the Louisiana purchased north to the southern boundary of 36 30 line Missouri would be restricted. There were plenty of democrats in the north who hated that decision; Stephen Douglas and Franklin Pierce worked to support this legislation. The northern democratic party was decimated and many of those former democrats migrated to a new emerging republican party. Once it was in place, it became one of the preconditions necessary for what will become the breakup of the political party but the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1854 Kansas territory wanted become a state. The only question left to be decided was whether it would be a slave state or a free state. Stephen Arnold Douglas, the Democratic Senator of Illinois, strongly believed that the people of the territories should decide for themselves whether they wanted slavery. He sponsored the Kansas Nebraska bill and said that Kansas should be split into two states Kansas and Nebraska and that the question of slavery would be left to the vote of the settlers. He called this principle popular sovereignty. The debate over the question of slavery in the territories became more of a problem than expected. Proslavery and antislavery groups fought many wars, each side wanting to gain control of Kansas so they could have more power in Congress. More power would mean more votes for or against slavery. The bill also had its flaws. The law said that the people of Kansas were free to decide on slavery but the territories were not sovereign political units so they were not entirely free. This also caused controversy between the two sections. The wars were known as "Bloody Kansas." Neither side knew it, but with each day of fighting, they were getting a step closer to the Civil War.…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States (1861-1865) was born is 1809, he came from a very humble family of farmers. Lincoln was an ambitious young man who learned to write and read and educated himself into becoming a respectful lawyer earning his license in 1837 and becoming a renowned public figure in Springfield, Illinois. He had an outstanding impact in the 1850’s when the Republican Party was fighting against slavery also known as the ‘’ Free-Soilers, and Anti-slavery Democrats’’. Lincoln got recognized during several slavery debates in a senate run in 1858 against S. Douglas claiming that: ‘’Slavery violated the natural rights of Black people.’’ He entered the presidential election in 1860 during the midst of slavery…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abraham Lincoln was the most known for his proclamation to end slavery in the United States. President Lincoln started his demand to end the slavery four months into his presidency. He began his efforts by “countermanding a General’s order to free slaves of owners resisting the United States, fearful that this will commit him to a totally abolitionist…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq 6

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All throughout the 1800's, slavery was a very controversial topic. During the 1860 election, Abraham Lincoln was asked about his views on slavery. He simply stated that he would do anything with slavery to preserve the union. A few months later, Lincoln issued the Emancipation and this went slightly against what he had said earlier. Once this was issued, the preservation of the Union and the abolition of slavery became the main goal in the war. I believe that Lincoln's main goal was to preserve the Union and although he felt that slavery was morally wrong, he was willing to do anything to keep it together.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source B states that Lincoln “challenged the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which was essentially a pro-slavery bill… Ultimately he lost the nomination as its Vice Presidential candidate in 1856. However, he continued his campaigning against slavery.” This citation shows how though Lincoln lost all hope of getting power to stop slavery, he still encouraged the fight against slavery. During Abraham Lincoln’s youth, he strived to understand the talk of politics and what they are Source C depicts, “As a boy he listened to his father and friends talk about the issues of the day, and then worked the idea in his mind until he understood it… he would repeat things over and over until it was fixed in his mind.” Abraham Lincoln wanted to preserve the Union even though he knew other people disagreed with him. “He put in long hours attending to the countless details of running the country, including spending the entire night, sometimes, at the telegraph office, waiting for the latest news from his generals.” Source C portrays. Abraham Lincoln’s success shows us that determination leads to…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By growing in a difficult middle class, Lincoln seen and did what a typical american was living during his life and the difficulties he had. Every steps in his life brought him to make the change that will make America greater by helping the people who were living in poverty or slavery. He wanted families to had the chance he had as one of them to have a great future and made a lot of economic reform. For the abolition of slavery, Abraham always thought that slavery was the opposite of the values of the country such as : Equality and liberty. There is a moment that really gave him the motivation to change things: "The first job he was able to take involved returning to New Orleans with cargo aboard his flatboat; this trip had a profound impact on Lincoln and…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was implicitly repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, submitted to Congress by Stephen A. Douglas in January 1854. The Act opened Kansas Territory and Nebraska Territory to slavery and future admission of slave states by allowing white male settlers in those territories to determine through "popular sovereignty" whether they would allow slavery within each territory. Thus, the Kansas-Nebraska Act effectively undermined the prohibition on slavery in territory north of 36°30′ latitude which had been established by the Missouri Compromise. This change was viewed by Free Soilers and many abolitionist Northerners as an aggressive, expansionist maneuver by the slave-owning South, and led to the creation of the Republican Party.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While Abraham Lincoln was not a supporter of slavery, he was also not against it during the beginning of his presidency. Lincoln believed that the government should not terminate slavery in places where it was already occurring. While his main intention was to grant all men freedom, he was responsible for whether or not he could save union. Although Lincoln was not focused on abolishing or protecting slavery, later on he did use his powers to end slavery. Slaves were the main reason why the Confederacy had structures and food. Since they built the structures and grew the food for them. Lincoln came to the conclusion that he could approve the army to free slaves, since he had the control of ordering the Union army to take the Confederate supplies.…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The collapse of the Union was a result of the schism separating northern and southern states, originating from differing opinions on slavery which ultimately incited the South’s secession. As the election of 1860 drew near, hopeful democratic and republican candidates emerged despite the already turbulent condition of the nation over the issue of slavery. The Democratic ballot was split between the northern representative Stephen Douglas and southern representative John Breckinridge, while alone on the Republican ballot was Abraham Lincoln. Prior to the election, Lincoln and Douglas became engaged in a series of debates, most of which focused on slavery. Douglas expressed, in his opinion, that African Americans should not be allowed to gain…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln’s main stand on politics were to abolish slavery and give more rights to African-Americans.“The North's victory meant the end of slavery in the South, a land…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stephen A. Douglas created the Kansas-Nebraska Act because if he wanted Nebraska as a state so he could build a railroad that would make Chicago a hub for trading but southern states did not want to because it would come in as a free state and so he said that people of the Kansas and Nebraska could decide if they want to the state to be a slave owning state or not and called it “Popular Sovereignty.” Abraham Lincoln decided to come out of “retirement” and so object this idea publicly saying that people should not be offered the choice to own slaves. To prevent the expansion of slavery it needs to be completely banned and he also said the idea is good theoretically but people are not good enough morally and argued for the humanity of the slaves (Monroe…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise Of 1850

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Douglas in 1858. The Republicans charged that the Democrats wanted to legalize slavery in all the states not just in U.S. territory. They used this to attack many democrats, especially the sponsor of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen A. Douglas. Illinois Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln to challenge Stephen A. Douglas for his U.S. Senate seat. In his first campaign speech, he communicated how the North was afraid that the South wanted to expand slavery to the whole nation. He said, “A House divided against itself cannot stand,” which is from the Bible, “-I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved-I do not expect the house to fall-but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all other.” Abraham Lincoln said this in Springfield, Illinois, June 16,1858. They both had many debates throughout the year. They talked about the expansion of slavery. Lincoln was against the expansion of slavery. He said slavery was “a moral, a social, and a political wrong” and said that African Americans had rights under the Declaration of Independance, but he never said slavery should be abolished. Douglas said that popular sovereignty was the best way to address slavery because it was the most democratic. The Supreme Court said popular sovereignty was unconstitutional because people can not…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays