Preview

The Scramble For Africa

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Scramble For Africa
The Scramble For Africa

After the Berlin conference, European powers occupied and colonized areas in Africa, in order to gain resources. But many Africans weren't too happy with the idea of the Europeans coming in and controlling them. During the scramble of Africa, the actions and reactions of Africans was that some surrendered their territory and control over to the Europeans, while others rebelled against them. Others tried to appeal through religion and believed culture would give them an upper hand.

One of the main actions and reactions of Africans during the European scramble for their nation was that they surrendered their own territory and gave the Europeans control over to them. For example, document one is a form of contract by the Niger company to administer and develop the Niger River delta. This cedes control of African territory over to the British, that was later said to be signed by many African rulers. British people wanted to have legal control over to Africans, so the Africans were compliant and obedient.This contract was a direct result of surrendering over to the Europeans.Another example that shows that the Africans gave up to the Europeans is shown in document four where an African veteran talks to others. He states that if it weren't for the European’s technological advances, chances were they could have won, so they had no choice but to give up. “So we surrendered to the white people....” This shows again that the Africans were cooperative and surrendered their land as an action and reaction to the European scramble of Africa.

Some Africans didn't just surrender their land, they took matters into their own hands and refused to be helped by the white men, they rebelled and resisted. For example, in document two an Ashanti leader declines the British offer, of being under the protection of the British, and states that his people will remain independent. This document states that they don't want help from the British.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A hundred years later, however, a second wave of colonization took place. Within twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, every corner of the Earth was claimed by the British. It was divided up as if it had been a cake split between greedy European leaders. A company in specific called the Royal Niger Company, commissioned by the British government created a document in English for African leaders to sign in agreement to giving up their land and surrounding areas for the British to develop” (Doc 1). The Africans reacted out of fear and surrendered to the white men, acted diplomatically to agree with the British, and at…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    abundance of copper, rubber and ivory were appealing to him. He initially pledged to promote…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adowa in 1896 where Ethiopians were victorious over Italian troops is also not clear on why the Ethiopians fought back (doc.5). Another document on why the Ethiopians fought back so vigorously would be more helpful. In a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed on the Congo River in 1877, Mojimba, an Africna chief, describes how the British had overcame Africans with guns n a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed one of his men everyday and it is obvious that change ropean intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason why these Africans gave in would reveal if they saw the European threat as a to their…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The African leaders elucidated that they would never give in to European imperialism. Prempeh I, an Ashanti leader, clearly stated that he would never allow Britain to conquer the Ashanti kingdom (Doc. 2). Prempeh…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We can see in Document 1; the contract from the Royal Niger Company, that the Europeans wanted to make it seem as if they were giving the African Leaders a choice to give up their land. Leaders of these tribes would have believed that signing wasn’t an obligation and could refuse if they wanted. This shown in Document 2; The letter to Britain from the Ashanti leader, Prempeh I, where he states,” My kingdom of Ashanti will never commit itself to any such policy”. He declined in a respectful honorable manner, expecting the Europeans to leave them be. From Prempeh I’s point of view, he most likely believed that they were in charge of their own fate, but Europe did not just step back. An additional document that would support this would be from an African leader who signed the document, to see how they were treated in comparison to those who refused to…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years that followed the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) European nations divided and colonized Africa among themselves. This time period became to be known as the Scramble for Africa. It would be years until Africa freed itself of European domination. Yet in the time that the Scramble for Africa took place, European dominance was met with various reactions from the native people. Some natives unwillingly submitted, opposed to the idea of European domination, but left with no other choice. Other natives were willing to compromise, while the rest were preparing or already rebelling against the…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Africa was full of many kinds of different resources. All of which, they wanted for free. The three main powers that were invading Africa were France, Germany, and England. There were many things stopping them from getting these resources. A big one…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    European imperialism has shaped the world over and over many times, acquiring many colonies throughout the globe. The colonization of Africa was no different for the Europeans. The need for raw materials motivated Europeans to acquire new lands in order to provide resources for their industrialized economies. The strong sense of a burden to civilize and enlighten others became the perspective for the approach of colonization.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much of Africa's history revolves around it’s interactions with Europeans. The Europeans exploited and conquered much of the African continent. They were able to conquer Africa through imperialism which is a process of invasion, attack and exploitation for natural resources. Africa had many natural resources that Europeans wanted to themselves and the only solution they came up with was to conquer Africa.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been Europeans holding in africa going back past the fall of Constantinople but it wasn't until the introduction of colonies as areas of monetary value and prestige that they really started to get out of control around the world. This leads to a wild annexation and claim of the major European nations on African soil.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes it was how the Europeans presented their colonization. In document one Europeans offered money to Africans for lands. This document, a drafted contract, showed that at least some were willing to cooperate with Europeans (Doc 1). Another African kingdom, Ethiopia, embraced European settlement because they shared religion in common. One of the only christian states in Africa, Ethiopia proposed their cooperation in European colonization if Europeans would grant them seaports (Doc 3). They felt confident enough to ask for land because they thought they were more similar to Europeans than other Africans in some aspects, like religion, which they hoped would overlook their race and skin tone. It would be informational to see a document accounting the reactions of previously aligned African countries if one of them sided with Europeans and the other did not. It could possible show if there was a feeling of betrayal amongst Africans as a whole, instead other the Africans vs Europeans view that is expressed through most of the documents. As shown, it was possible for Africans to react positively to European settlement but overall the reaction and actions were against…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the late 17th century and early 18th century, almost all of Africa was under European rule. This was in great contrast to 1880, when close to none of Africa was under direct rule of the continents. This stark change in power was due to the interest in raw materials, new trade opportunities, political gain over other countries, and Europeans feeling the need to spread Christianity, democracy, and capitalism. (Spielvogel and McTighe 230-233). Although European imperialism helped to "civilize" the people of Africa and develop the continent, this justification is far outweighed by the facts that Africans were treated with immense oppression and a disregard for their culture. After imperialism, African nations were better able to prosper…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Berlin Conference was in 1884-1885, marked the start of the European competition for territory in Africa, it was called the scramble for africa. In meetings, Great Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, and King Leopold II divided their claims to African territory. During the conference the leaders also agreed to allow free trade among the colonies and made a system for negotiating future European claims in Africa. They did not provided any say for the peoples of Africa over the partitioning of their homelands.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    European Nations wanted more land, power, and natural resources. They got this by conquering and colonizing new lands. Africa was not colonized, making the continent a prime area for colonization. Prior to the 19th century European nations only used Africa for its slave trade, therefore, only settling on the coasts. The driving forces behind these European conquests in Africa were caused by political, cultural, and economic reasons.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Europe started to move closer inland of Africa, they started by making deals with the chiefs of native tribes. This started mostly with a journalists named H. M. Stanley. He explored Africa and made unfair treaties with leaders. He did this with support of the Belgian kind, King Leopold II. These treaties would often be something similar to, in exchange for a few yards of cloths and some trinkets, Belgium will be able to put their flag on the chiefs land and use the land as well as the people on it.5 Before Europe had come in and started to take over the land, the natives had known what resources they had and were very skilled in using them, and they lived largely off of trade with other regions and tribal communities. The had a livable system that was serving the community well. When Europeans took over, they saw many of the resources that were in Africa, such as diamonds and iron6 and knew the value of them on a bigger market and told the natives that there is much more worth in this land then they are getting out of it. The chiefs then let the Europeans trade the resources on a worldly scale, which, while it did give Africa a bigger, and more worldly economy, it quickly turned into a bourgeoisie/proletarian society with the African on…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays