The Role Of Political Leadership In The USA And Central Asian Countries
The Role of Political Leadership in the USA and Central Asian Countries: Comparative Analysis
Political systems can function with no constitution, judicial or legislative branches, but not a single government can survive with no strong leader, a powerful executive to form a state policy. Howard Gardner, an American psychologist, in his book “Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership,” defined a leader as “an individual (or, rarely, a set of individuals) who significantly affects the thoughts, feelings, and/or behaviors of a significant number of individuals.” Therefore, a true leader is expected to be honest and trusted, being responsible for people’s attitude and general behavior.
A well-being of a nation is directly dependent on executive’s willingness to take an action toward an economic growth. Working in a state interest influences a rapidity of progress and competitiveness of a country. There are two main purposes of present analysis. Firstly, a research is made to apply a success of certain USA leaders to current issues in the Central Asian region. Secondly, a study disserts a competition for regional leadership within Central Asia.
Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth president of the United States, saved the country from separation by great, but drastic actions. “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.” These were words spoken by Samuel Adams, a philosopher, perfectly demonstrate what Abraham Lincoln was doing when he used his executive powers in an acceptable way to avoid collapse. He believed in protecting the rights of the people of the United States at all costs. Yet, it could be argued that he was using his executive powers incorrectly. Abraham Lincoln believed that some decisions were passed more quickly and efficiently if decided first by him, and then taken to legislation to get their approval. The United States needed a strong
Political systems can function with no constitution, judicial or legislative branches, but not a single government can survive with no strong leader, a powerful executive to form a state policy. Howard Gardner, an American psychologist, in his book “Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership,” defined a leader as “an individual (or, rarely, a set of individuals) who significantly affects the thoughts, feelings, and/or behaviors of a significant number of individuals.” Therefore, a true leader is expected to be honest and trusted, being responsible for people’s attitude and general behavior.
A well-being of a nation is directly dependent on executive’s willingness to take an action toward an economic growth. Working in a state interest influences a rapidity of progress and competitiveness of a country. There are two main purposes of present analysis. Firstly, a research is made to apply a success of certain USA leaders to current issues in the Central Asian region. Secondly, a study disserts a competition for regional leadership within Central Asia.
Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth president of the United States, saved the country from separation by great, but drastic actions. “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.” These were words spoken by Samuel Adams, a philosopher, perfectly demonstrate what Abraham Lincoln was doing when he used his executive powers in an acceptable way to avoid collapse. He believed in protecting the rights of the people of the United States at all costs. Yet, it could be argued that he was using his executive powers incorrectly. Abraham Lincoln believed that some decisions were passed more quickly and efficiently if decided first by him, and then taken to legislation to get their approval. The United States needed a strong