Preview

The Real Danger Is Not That Computers Will Begin To Think Like Men Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Real Danger Is Not That Computers Will Begin To Think Like Men Analysis
Research question quote – “The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers.” – Sydney G. Harris

The most basic meaning of the quote, “The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but men will begin to think like computers” according to me is that humans should think outside the box, open up our minds and to try and understand what is happening around us instead of what is being told to us. Scientists and philosophers only think about what might happen if computers will think like humans but the real issue is the total opposite of that which would be what if humans begin to think like computers. The repercussions of the latter are more devastating than
…show more content…
The quote reinforces this idea into any reader by creating fear by using the word “danger” in the quote which has an adverse effect making us believe that it is really bad for humans to think like computers before we even understand the quote fully itself. Emotions, intuition and learning from experience is what makes us humans. Computers on the other hand are solely based on computational processes, inputs and outputs no matter how complex the system is. The danger Harris talks about and fears is that we would become emotionless and not be able to differentiate between right or wrong. We would make decisions based only on logic and reasoning and not what feels right. Emotions play a huge part in being a human in shaping any human being and losing that would be losing being a human. Harris fears that one day every human being would be without any sort of personality and just do what we were being ordered to do, getting inputs, processing it and producing an output without bothering to think the situation over. There is a difference in human’s lifestyle and a computer’s life style and we should stick to it and not create an imbalance between the two is what I think was Harris’ ambition by saying this …show more content…
In the Pensées, the difference between computers and humans were explained, where computers have a “spirit of geometry” and humans have the “spirit of finesse”. The key differences between these two were that computers work using deductive reasoning and logic but humans work as mix of reasoning and emotions giving us the ability to possess an intuitive mind. For example, we know that Einstein did not have extra information which was not known to the other physicists of that time period when he came up with the theory of relativity. All he did was deduce the same information which was known to all in a completely different way, thinking outside the box, tested these deductions and hence proving them. This was all possible due to imagination which is something humans would lose if we started to think like computers. This example another quote by Einstein which is, “Laws are only reached by non-logical methods. To make a law one has to have an intellectual love of the subject”. The keywords in this quote are “love” and “non-logical”. A renowned scientist as Einstein himself agrees that imagination and feelings are far more important than just logic and reasoning so we should fear giving all this up. Human thinking is something which cannot be equated with some given set rules and theorems hence giving it that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In My Computers

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I figured out that Alan P. Lightman is trying to show us a new world, the world of computers. Today society ensures their lives to computers, they trust to death that nothing will happen if we save everything to computers. Is it really true?, I believe that computers are turning humans into their own weapon. In a weapon that will kill themselves. What I am trying to say is that if humans continue to reinsuring their lives to computers then everything will be lost. What happened to the old days? We may not be looking bright, but we are destroying the beauty of nature by putting computers as our first priority. It should not be like this and this is what computers are making to humans.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Author for the Washington Post, Joel Achenbach, in his columns, addresses issues from the secret to happiness to Artificial Intelligence. He addresses these issues in a manner of different ways, like expert testimony, analysis, and other rhetorical devices. Achenbach’s purpose as a writer is to inform the audience of the consequences of one’s actions, as mentioned in his article, “Researchers create a Computer Program that learns the way humans do,” when he states, “The breakthrough comes during a period of great excitement in the A.I. community, but also some anxiety about whether there are sufficient safeguards to ensure that machine intelligence doesn't somehow run away from its human creators.” He adopts a consistent tone throughout his columns, one of a casual, yet explanatory voice.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right as Carr finally proves his point, proceeds to refer to himself as a “worrywart.” He completely criticizes the meaning of his entire argument- maybe the aspect of the Internet isn’t such a bad thing, after all. This has the audience in utter confusion, leaving them to make the decision on their own. Although, it is still apparent that Carr believes the Internet is drastically revamping our brains, and he makes note of that when he describes society evolving into “pancake people.” Carr uses one last strong connection with the audience at the end of this article by referring to the movie mentioned in the beginning of the article. He states, “It is our intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence,” (Carr 8) leaving the audience to question whether or not Google is actually making us…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The emotion the author tries to invoke is fear because he wants the reader to be afraid of the Internet. In that specific paragraph, it quotes a scene from the movie where the supercomputer in the spaceship is losing its mind and the astronaut had just taken off into space (Carr 1). The reason why this specific example provokes fear is because when the supercomputer is in control of your destination and it says it's losing its mind then the astronaut is going to die; the reader thinks of the supercomputer as the Internet and how powerful it is that it might cause death. This is really important and plays a big part in the article because in the conclusion he states that the internet is taking over and that humans are becoming more machine-like (Carr 10). Carr tries to make the reader afraid of the future, how we rely on the Internet too much, and the technology will eventually take over the human…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Continuing, Carr’s use of the metaphor makes a strong statement in his argument and supports the idea that technology is making humans into machines well. To compare humans to machines appeals to the readers’ pathos because it makes the situation more directed towards the reader and their emotions. For those who use technology daily, the comparison would affect them more because they are more likely to be surrounded by technology and possible end up thinking like the machine they are using. Carr makes sure that this metaphor show how the human brain is changing and has adapt to work like a clock and that it will adapt to be like the other devices being used. Analyzing the two strategies, personal anecdote and figurative language, Carr uses…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is far easier to accept data on the internet superficially than it is to be skeptical of information. Carr asserts that this ideology that information collection should be based on efficiency rather than skepticism may be detrimental in the future as artificial intelligence (AI) software develops. The brain will be seen by the public as a computer, much like that of an AI, that should transmit information hastily, rather than seen as a being that should ponder and question sources. He inquires on the safety of such an ideology and encourages readers to analyze that which they read and research. People are capable of deep thought and analysis, so accepting information superficially is dangerous.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He poses that being undistracted while reading allows people to think deeply. The abilty to think deeply has a positive connetation because it allows a person the reasources to come up with their own thoughts and opinions and better understand what they are reading. “In quiet spaces opened up by the prolonged undistracted reading of a book, people made their own associations, drew their own inferences and analogies, fostered their own ideas. They thought deeply as they read deeply” (65). The ablity to thinking deeply is positive because it gives the reader the ablity to form their ideas. “Reading was like working out a puzzle. The brain’s entire cortex, including the foward areas associated with problem solving and descion making, would have been buzzing with neural activity” (61). The human brain is able to uncode and solve puzzles that other species cannot. “As we use what the sociologist Daniel Bell has called our ‘intellecutal technologies’-the tools that extend our mental rather than our physical capacities- we inevitably begin to take on the qualities of those technologies.” I agree with what Carr poses, we do take on the characteristics of technology. As the saying goes our brains are like…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    …as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central message of this text is that if people are not careful with the constant bombardment of electronic stimulation, they will go down a path of eventual knowledge bankruptcy. This bankruptcy will lead to our minds becoming hardwired differently than ever before, and could lead to future generations subsequently being more and more unintelligent.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    So how has this affected our minds? Have we turned our brains into a living computer, or are we so dependent on outside answers that we’ve ceased thinking for ourselves? In today’s society we’ve entered a state of ignorant bliss about how little knowledge and wisdom we truly hold. Neil Postman (1984), the author of “Amusing Ourselves to Death” and an educator, tackled the now apparent fact that unlike George Orwell’s prediction that our rights to thinking would be ripped away, Aldous Huxley’s prediction that we will gladly hand them away voluntarily has become more and more true. Both Orwell and Huxley are English authors. (Postman, 1984)…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a world where people are all programmed to think a certain way, where every action is robotic,. wWhere they have no freedom of thought. T, this is the reality we face that is described in the book written by Nicholas Carr, The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. Google is restructuring the human mind for its own purposes, forof faster information extraction and retrieval. The fact that Google is doing this is wrong, because we should be able to do more than parse through data as quickly as possible.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans are able to evaluate a given situation and can know the consequences of their actions. With this ability, “human beings have the ability, with their cognitive system, to generate internal mental representations with reason, thinking and understanding”(Merkulov). Humans have the ability to solve a problem and use their judgement to make sense and to respond to it intelligently.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop, will you? Stop, Dave. Will you stop, Dave?”, the reader automatically thinks that it is a sentence coming from a human but is actually coming from a machine. Carr includes this quote in order to begin his writing in a very shocking way and tie the whole article together at the end. The author of this specific scene includes this quote to show how he believes that machines will eventually become more “human” than humans are. Carr ties this into the last paragraph of his paper to show how us humans are becoming so involved and focused on getting things done that we begin to function like “clockwork”. Humans are becoming more like robots and believing what we are told is correct instead of taking the time to form our own opinions and thoughts on topics. This is especially frightening due to the fact that I have seen instances when humans seemed to be functioning just like robots.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If technology influence also increases, the human brain will not be highly valued. "The human…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does it mean to be human? What makes who we are? What drives us? Could it be the desire of becoming better, faster, and stronger, perhaps? All throughout history, humans have been known to have advanced in their respective eras through planning and their own advancements in technology. Technology is one of the many things that people in the 21st century debate about, whether it’s good or bad, or even neutral. Why do so many disagree with the idea of becoming better through the advances in technology? The main the topic of becoming something more, something post-human, revolves around the “luddites” (artisans in the early nineteenth century who protested technology by destroying it) believe we’re “playing God.” What does it even mean to play God? Technology has taken us very far indeed, but we haven’t made anything so uncanny that will surely match God himself. If anything, we’ve been doing exactly what’s in our nature: grow, expand, nurture ourselves, and evolve. We can only do as much as the environment allows us; we only make what we can with what we have. The advances in technology today are just our own way of reaching another step in our evolutionary cycle, and we shall continue to move forward. We shall reach another step in human evolution, whether it’s mentally or physically; we know that we’ll be holding technology’s hand for now and forever more, because as it is, we’ve become dependent of it. Should we fear our future endeavors within the technological age? I’m ready to move up to a new level in my evolution, whether I’m wired in circuitry, a cyborg, or fully mechanical; it’s time to let go of those fears, of those demons holding us back. Our limits are only set by our own standards, our own hands, so if we keep moving forward, then our limit is not what the kind of humans we’re now, but ‘transhumanism.’…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics