Preview

The Purposes of Punishment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1418 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Purposes of Punishment
The purposes of punishment.
What are the purposes of punishment? Which do you consider to be the most important and why?

Student: ***********

Student number: *******

Tutor name: *************

Hand-in date: 21st of November 2011

To begin with, it is necessary to say that punishment is an integral part of modern countries’ legal systems, because countries have a duty to protect society from wrongdoers and authorities could reach success in it by punishing offenders. Oxford English Dictionary defines punishment as the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offence. There are four main purposes of punishment – incapacitation, deterrence, retribution and rehabilitation – and the aim of this paper is to describe and analyze them and also to determine which purpose might be regarded as the most important.
The first aim of the punishment that needs to be described is incapacitation. Incapacitation means that an offender deprives the ability to commit further crimes. It might be achieved by diverse methods. For instance, incapacitation by cutting off thieves’ hands, as it took place in ancient times, or by imprisoning offenders in order to separate them from the community. There are two types of incapacitation: selective and collective. Selective incapacitation is a social policy the aim of which is to isolate individuals deemed to be the most dangerous for the society. Moreover, Polinsky and Shavell state that reducing the punishment duration for those who committed crime first time can be considered as a policy of selective incapacitation. In contrast, collective incapacitation is imposing the same sentences on those who committed specific crimes. Visher states that it involves standardized guidelines for the sentencing of any offender for a specific offense. It also needs to be added that there are advantages and disadvantages of incapacitation. The main advantage of incapacitating offenders is that criminals cannot re-offend being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final and stricter objective is incapacitation. This objective is usually reserved for the more heinous crimes and offenders that maybe incapable of reform. These types of crime would involve multiple murders or large amount of public terror.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another type of sentence given to a criminal is deterrence and in lamens terms it is the use of punishment as a threat to deter people from offending. Deterrence can be divided into three separate categories. “Specific deterrence, as used in criminal justice, refers to crime prevention achieved through instilling fear in the specific individual being punished such that they refrain from future violation of the law; also referred to as individual deterrence. General deterrence, as used in criminal justice, refers to crime prevention achieved through instilling fear in the general population through the punishment of offenders. Incapacitation is considered by some to be a subset of specific deterrence. Incapacitation aims to prevent future crimes not by rehabilitating…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a contemporary society where crime takes place we expect the state authority to dispense justice in the form of punishment to maintain social solidarity. There are many forms of punishment that can be given to an offender, each with their own functions for the offender and society itself.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Criminal Sentencing

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In The Limits of Criminal Sanction, Herbert Packer said that criminal punishment should serve two purposes; “deserved infliction of suffering on evil doers” and “the prevention of crime” (Packer, 1968, pp. 36-37). Punishment of offenders in the United States is delivered through criminal sentencing. Sentencing is defined as “the imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority” (Seiter, 2008, p. 40) When examining criminal sentencing, one must first understand the basic theories associated with the punishments given to criminals. There are five main goals/theories behind criminal sentencing; punishment, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restitution.…

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sentencing is very important and usually the last stage of the criminal process. The purpose of sentencing is to punish the criminals while at the same time stopping crime from continuing. The five philosophical reasons for sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and restoration. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. Deterrence is the strategy of preventing crime through the threat of punishment. It assumes that potential criminals will weigh the costs of punishments versus the benefits of the criminal act so then the punishments will more then likely be more severe. Incapacitation is a strategy for preventing crime by detaining wrongdoers in prison, separating them from the community and reducing criminal opportunities. Then there is rehabilitation, which is the philosophy that society is best served when wrongdoers are not simply punished, but provided the resources needed to eliminate criminality from their behavioral patterns. Restoration is a sentencing goal that seeks to address the damage by making the community and the victim “whole again”.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since time began, there was crime and with crime came the need to punish criminals. How criminals were punished and the methods behind the punishment changed throughout the times. Standards of punishment moved from banishment and fines to torture and “blood feuds” (Siegel & Senna, 2005). A more organized system of punishment came with the formation of Common Law, which was brought over to the United States from England. With the development of a system, there was a move away from physical punishment toward methods more acceptably used today in the United States.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Criminals

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sentencing is an important aspect in the criminal justice process. It is the punishment defendants receive when they are convicted of a crime. The punishment spectrum is wide and vast, ranging from probation to death. Punishment and sentencing present some of the most complex issues of the criminal justice system. There are four main philosophical reasons surrounding the purpose of sentencing; they are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. Retribution is the philosophy that a criminal's punishment shall be determined on the severity of the crime he or she committed. It should be noted that retribution is not the same thing as revenge and that the punishment does not satisfy the revenge theory to anyone who may have been a victim. The retribution philosophy also is inspired by the Old Testament, where it states "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." Deterrence philosophy has two parts to it, which are the general and specific deterrence. The Deterrence philosophy is based on the fact that a criminal will realize the punishment outweighs the crime that he or she is going to commit. This philosophy hopes to prevent the criminal from going through with the criminal act. The general deterrence works this way, if the punishment is seen to outweigh the crime then others will be deterred from committing the same crime. The specific deterrence is based on the theory that a criminal, once punished and released, will not want to commit another crime and receive the same punishment. The Incapacitation philosophy believes by incarcerating criminals, this takes away the criminals liberty by placing them in jail or prison; this will ultimately keep the criminal from committing further crimes among society and reduce further criminal opportunity. Rehabilitation is another means of trying to reduce criminal activity. Rehabilitation will teach a person not to commit further criminal acts. This philosophy believes that the public is better…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    a general system of punishment, the punishment of specific persons, and the specific type (and amount) of punishment to be imposed in a given scenario (Duff). With respect to the first component, which he called the “general justifying aim” of the system of punishment (Duff), there are several purposes for instituting a penal system; the most common of which are general deterrence, specific deterrence, incarceration/incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. While it is easy to see how each of these can be beneficial and justify the general punishment system in the abstract, upon closer examination the existence of multiple underlying justifications…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A punishment is the negative consequence forced upon someone by a group or person. Normally a punishment is a consequence of a rule being broken. A rule is any type of vehicle, or guide to ensure certain actions or behavior. Rules are often just written or spoken, and provide guidelines for human activity. A rule is made by higher authority, like a Parent, King, Minister, Dictator, or a Teacher. Rules are enforced with punishments, to deter people from breaking them. Besides punishments being used to deter people; they could also be used to isolate, retribution, and rehabilitate criminals. The question that is related to this essay is; what was the goal of older punishment and what is the goal of modern punishment?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prisons and Jails

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Incarceration is the most common example of punishment in the correctional system, but the death penalty and lesser penalties such as probation are also designed to be punitive. Perhaps the most obvious goals of the correctional system is to punish those who are found guilty of crimes. In theory this is suppose to serve as a deterrent against one repeating criminal activity and as an example to others of why criminal activity should be avoided. It is unclear how well the modern U.S. correctional system achieves these goals and whether the money invested in the correctional system might be better spent.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 4 Study Guide Sentencing 1. The 5 philosophies of purpose of punishment (purposes, examples, pros and cons): a. Deterrence (specific and general) b. Incapacitation c. Retribution d. Rehabilitation e. Restorative Justice 2. Corporal Punishment 3. History of punishment- banishment, sterilization, transportation 4.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay has outlined two aims of sentencing, Rehabilitation and Retribution, and how they affect offenders during and after prison. Overall, rehabilitation has an affect on the offender, depending on the crime committed; they should be put on a programme where it suits their needs. An example when a drug addict should not be put on the same programme as an alcoholic as they are two different causes. In this instance, rehabilitation is a better way for justifying punishment. It has better regard for the offender as it recognises the reality of social inequity. However, with retribution, it should be determined by the seriousness of the crime and not by consequentialist factors, such as whether the punishment is enough to deter society. In some cases with retribution, it seems to be taken advantage of the innocent. But the issue of the execution of innocent persons is also a problem for retribution, if there is a serious risk of executing the innocent then one of the key principles of retribution is that people should get what they deserve (and therefore only what they…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics