Preview

The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists
Imagine living in a society where everyone gets along and agrees with everything. Thankfully, we live in a society where people have their sets of beliefs and tend to disagree with one another. When creating the Constitution there was a huge debate regarding the future of the United States and how it was going to be regulated. This was one of the biggest debates to be known throughout United States history. It led down to two different opposing groups the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists. There are pros and cons about people disagreeing. For instance, the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists both had some of the similar political thoughts as well as some political thoughts that they did not agree with one another. Though, both of the parties had different outlooks on what they thought, they would eventually come together and decided what is better for everyone as a nation.
After the constitution was created in 1787, members of the Anti- Federalists believed that they could not ratify the constitution. The Anti- Federalists also believed that the United
…show more content…
They divided their power within everyone else. Especially when it came to the division of the powers between the legislative, judicial, and the executive branches that would avoid any President from becoming a person with complete higher power. “The separation of powers and elaborate series of checks and balances that the Constitution created, as well as the system of federalism itself, reflects fear. The Federalists divided power; unlike the Antifederalists, they did not.” The Federalists believed in and supported the idea of government. They believed in the source of Majority Rule. They took everyone’s opinion in to consideration. Therefore, in the end it was all a success, all of the troubles that the Federalists had to go through were worth

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Federalists, who most of them gained their livelihoods as merchants, shopkeepers, professionals, artisans, and commercial farmers, desired a government that would foster the growth of a market economy and facilitate trade with other countries. They also believed that society benefited when people pursued individual goals. Federalist James Madison claimed that the Constitution would be beneficial because a large republic contained more safeguards than a small one, but Anti-Federalists disagreed with that, because they favored small republics and because they feared the actions of men who would likely dominate the central government. Anti-Federalists, who were small farmers, many of them debtors, wanted nothing to do with this Constitution. They believed that the power should remain in the states. They argued that a republic must be geographically small with a homogeneous population in order to meet the needs of its people. Anti-Federalists also thought that the Constitution lacked adequate protection against corruption and abuse of power.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They also felt as if the Union to last there must be a stronger central government. Lastly they wanted the central government to have power that they lacked in the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists that the constitution made the government have too much power. Because the Constitution was making the Central government too strong, the Anti-federalists feared that the states would have no power. They also feared that if the president was elected again, he may abuse the power and act like a king. The federalists would also have no Bill of Rights, and many state constitutions had only one. Later the federalists promised to add the Bill of Rights if the Anti-federalists voted for the Constitution. Both the federalists and the Anti-Federalists gave strong points on why people should or should not vote for the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP GOV FEDERALISM HOMEWORK

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The anti-federalists opposed the constitution because, they thought that new constitution would cause “an immense increase of taxes” spent by an ever-growing federal government.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To create a stronger national government and to guard against the misuse and abuse of its powers, the Federalists believe that the government should have separate powers, so they wanted to divide the governing powers up between different branches of the government. I agree with what the Federalists wanted to do here because one branch can only take so much. So, to make things easier and fair, they wanted to split the powers up.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    anti feds essay

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The constitutional convention is trying to decide on a plan to use, the Federalists or Anti Federalists. The Federalists wanted a strong central form of government. The Anti Federalists wanted less power to the national government and more power to the states. Even though the rights of the people may have been secured in the constitution, the Anti Federalists had the best plan because the Federalists gave the national government too much power and the constitution had no clearly stated bill of rights. The Anti Federalist plan included having a bill of rights that would clearly state and secure the rights of the people.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Dbq

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1787, a couple of years after America broke away from England, the constitution we use today was made. Before, starting in 1777, the states operated under a government they called the “Articles of Confederation.” This government said that each state should have its own independence, and should operate within their own government. After 6 years, this government didn’t work well, because of civil unrest, bad trade, and inflation. A group of men led by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and others, believed in this constitution. These people were called Federalists. These federalists believed that the states should be operated by one unified single government. The Federalists wanted to write a new constitution,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists believed that the constitution would take away too much power from state and local governments. They argued that the nation is too large for national government to look after each problem or concerns of people on a state. Federalists argued that the original context of the Constitution did not include the bill…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even president Jefferson at one point took advantage of the widening gap between Federalist groups and the obvious disagreements that led to less and less decision making.1 The Federalists lost power because of their infighting. Such infighting allowed their enemies to exploit weaknesses in the party and gain power over the Federalists, slowly inching them to their demise. Madison’s retirement proved to be another crushing blow to the Federalists, as it allowed their enemies, the Anti-Federalists, to have a leader that would have no antithesis with the Federalists.2 Madison supported Federalist ideas because while he was not a pledged Federalist, he had been in his earlier days. His position of power would have allowed for the Federalists to pass a few laws, but that opportunity was short lived and was not taken advantage of, therefore delivering a blow to their power. Loss of power once again proved detrimental to the Federalist when they squandered a majority in Congress. If not for the headstrongness of the members, the Federalists would have remained in power when they had a majority and could have done much to keep themselves in power or to benefit themselves.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism Pros And Cons

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After reading the Federalist Papers, specifically number 10 and 51, it is my belief that the Federalists believed that a strong, centralized government would “break and control the violence of factions” (10). Madison defined faction as a number of citizens that were united and acted under a common impulse or interest; he stated that factions needed to be checked because they are often able to bypass the rules and interests of the minority in order to achieve what the majority wants (10). He believed that there were two ways to remove factions: first, remove liberty from society; second, make sure that everyone in society shared the same opinion. Madison believed both of these were not “folly;” however, the proposed Constitution largely diminished…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalists wanted our government to remain the same; a monarchy. This would cause distrust in the government because of the possible corruption. Federalists felt we should have a central government. They preferred a government with three branches. I feel they cared more about the feelings of the people. Which is why I have sided with the federalist.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After gaining independence from Britain America had to find the ideal form of government where centralized power and state power was well balanced. This however became a difficult task when the country was divided between Federalist, those who wanted a strong federal government and Antifederalist, the ones who believed in strong state power. Antifederalist often opposed the Constitution as well, since they believed it gave the central government too much power over the people. When war between Britain and France broke out this dispute only grew since the Federalist sided with Great Britain and, Anti- Federalist favored the French. However, after several years of discord between Federalist and Antifederalist the foreign policy disaster which…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays