Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Open Carry

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Open Carry
Many Americans today openly carry their guns with them in public. There are different reasons why some people do open-carry, but one of the main reasons is for self protection. America has had many gun laws passed in the past years, making it more strict. With all of the shootings going on, and terroristic threats, more people have been buying guns for their own protection. People never know when a shooting could happen, and that is a scary thought to many Americans across the nation.
Twenty-nine states can openly carry a firearm without a permit or license, 15 states require a permit or license to open carry depending on the firearm, and four states prohibit open carry completely. So many gun laws have been passed, that congress felt would
…show more content…
Even if someone doesn’t have a bad record, that doesn’t mean that they are not bad people. It is very hard to tell if someone can be trusted while having a gun out in public. People should open carry, due to the fact that there is a lot of violence in this nation. According to the statistic in the article, Careful with the Panic: Violent Crime and Gun Crime Are Both Dropping, Gun crime was at its highest percentage in 1993, and has been declining since then. This decline in homicides is probably due to the fact that people got smart and started buying guns for protection. More Americans should own guns, not only because it is good protection, but if everyone knew how to at least shoot a gun, then some people would not be so afraid of them. “The first rule of not being a victim is not looking like a victim… The best way to avoid a fight is to look like you can win one”(Zimmerman). Most criminals will not mess with someone that they feel as if they could put up a fight. They want to pick out the weakest looking victim. A person carrying a gun in the open is not someone that a criminal would want to mess with most of the time. So that right there is another reason more people should openly carry a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strict Gun Control (SGC) is defined as a “collection of legally authorized limitations designed to impose firearm shortage on the general residents” (Lance K). In the USA everyone has right to own anything or right to purchase whatever they want. In the same way people are purchasing the guns for different views. Some of them are purchasing to protect themselves and also they think that they have right to own it. Whereas, the others believe that they earn money by harming or blacking others. The best example is the death of an international student Sai Kiran Goud .On June 15, 2015 this 21 year male, doing his masters at the university in Miami was apparently waylaid by a group of suspected robbers. As he refused to give his iPhone he was killed…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Various thoughts on gun regulation have been recommended to the press, local government, and people in power at the federal level. Most of which are quickly rejected as they are expected to fail or are unable to make it through Congress due to inside politics. An idea that has not yet been pushed through Congress is allowing all responsible citizens to carry firearms with the potential consequence of a minimum five year prison sentence along with fines if the weapon is not used by the carrier in a situation of self-defense. With those laws in place, criminals may consider alternatives before violating their next victim with a firearm. This will also help to cut down on straw-purchases of firearms.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Opponents of concealed carry argue that increased gun ownership leads to more gun crime and unintended gun injuries. They contend that concealed handguns increase the chances of arguments becoming lethal, and that society would be safer with fewer guns on the street, not more. Dr. John Lott, published More Guns, Less Crime which concluded that the "shall-issue" laws linked with a reduction in violent crimes in 1988. Lott argued that if states that did not permit concealed handguns in 1992 had permitted them in 1977, 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and 12,000 robberies would have been prevented between 1977 and…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past couple months, we have been hearing devastating news reports. School shootings, movie theater massacres, church shootings, there has been numerous reports of these tragic events. Many people believe that guns are the problem, but in reality it’s the people that need to think before they act. It’s true what they say, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” the more people with guns in the street, the safer it can be. There have been many states that have passed laws that let people openly carry guns, and Oregon is considering passing it as well. Oregon should allow law abiding citizens to carry guns openly. There have been many other states that has proven the open carry law works and is beneficial. Passing the open carry…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Smith is a 15 year old student. He comes home from school and finds the police are at his house. The police then tell him that his mother has been shot and killed. The heartache, the grief, and the horror that goes through him as he hears this is unbearable. Smith’s pain could have been prevented with a gun. According to polled felons, 3/5 of them won’t target an armed victim. That means three out of five crimes could have been stopped if only the victim had a gun. Altering the gun laws we have now would make it so that more lives would be lost and would also be unconstitutional. That is why we must not alter the gun laws we have now.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open Carry Research Paper

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The new Open Carry law in Texas has created a lot of heat recently. This law allows previses owners of the concealed handgun license (CHL) to now freely display their weapon at the side of their hip or shoulder as long as it is inside a holster. In order to actually be able to openly carry a handgun in Texas you must: be at least twenty-one years of age, have a clean criminal and psychological record, and also complete the classroom training; while passing a shooting test. So imagine walking down your neighborhood or public park and seeing someone with a loaded handgun at the side of their hip. This may be concerning for some citizens because they do not know if this is someone whom will go buck-wild and open fire at anyone in their crosshair or they could be the only person whose lead encouragement will protect your very life. This law has complete support from the peculiar views of the second amendment, yet still has a copious amount of combined restrictions for the: gun owners, businesses, non-gun owners, and even the police. Texas has allowed its citizens to carry a concealed handgun for over twenty years; you have probably encountered a countless number of civilians with a concealed weapon and never realized it. So while open carry may be fairly new to being revitalized in Texas, it…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open carry allows individuals to openly carry firearms without of the need of a permit, some states require a permit or…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This however is not so due to the fact most people that commit violent crimes do not use a gun that they obtained legally. Of the guns used in violent crimes 39.6% were obtained from a friend or relative, 39.2 % from the street or an illegal source, 0.7% at a gun show, 1.0% from a flea market, and 3.8 % from a pawn shop (Olmstead, J. S.). All of these circumstances do not require the criminal to go through a background check which would most likely not allow them to obtain the weapon. With these numbers it only leaves 8.3% of criminals obtaining their guns legally (Olmstead, J. S.). This shows that by making it harder to obtain weapons it only hurts the law abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves.…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter gun laws should not be put in place because people feel safer owning a gun. Since it is impossible for our government to protect every family from every break in or every assault, it is necessary to own a gun. Even walking around on the street with a concealed carry firearm would make anyone feel safer. In fact, (1) states that implemented "shall-issue" concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%. So not only does it make you feel protected, it also gives criminals a reason to not go after you. This is just one of the many reasons why more strict gun control laws would not be the best idea.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is true that people have the right to bear arms because of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states that "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” But, just because people have the right to bear arms doesn’t mean that every should have a concealed weapons. Criminals are 75% more likely to carry when committing a crime too because there is a greater chance of finding a civilian with a concealed weapon.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.” The second amendment and open carry laws give law abiding citizens give those who apply the sense of security, protection, and safety to those who cannot protect themselves. Banning the right to bear arms and the right to openly carry would cause more harm than allowing legal citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Banning guns can cause a major issue in many ways. For example, if you ban public carry of guns, what's gonna happen if a spree shooting takes place in front of you and your unarmed. You have just become a sitting duck. Taking away guns takes away a sense of security for about 11 million citizens trying to protect themselves and their families. “People are safer in states where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons.” Most parents would do anything to keep their children safe, even give their life for the well-being of their kids. For example, the movie theater shooting in colorado. If a parent and their child were seeing a movie and the parent was armed, they could better their chances to get out alive if they are carrying then sitting and waiting for the police to disarm the criminal. Taking away or not allowing that right to be enacted is increasing the chances of harm more than making the streets safer without guns. “Banning weapons does not guarantee safety.” The saying goes, “A right unexercised, is a right that is lost”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On May 29, 2015 the Open Carry law passed in the Texas and Senate house but the law would not take effect until January 1, 2016 and Greg Abbott the Governor of Texas positively tweeted: “Open Carry just passed in both the Texas House & Senate. Next destination: My Pen. #txlege #tcot @NRA — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) May 29, 2015”. Many citizens are not happy with this because many children or young teens even adults get startled by seeing a gun out on the open like that. It’s disturbing not being able to have a world that’s in peace because it has gotten to the point that the people are having to carry fire arms in case of an emergency and it’ll be justified as self-defense. Statewide almost 70 percent of sheriffs oppose to the open carry law. The United States Supreme Court, after adding the 2nd amendment to the Bill of Rights had not made a decision to change anything until the United States V. Miller in 1939, after the argument of unregistered firearms for militia, the ‘National Firearms Act’ was added to the 2nd amendment, so now a “12-gauge shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches long without having registered it and without having in his possession a stamp-affixed written order for it” if going pass the requirements of the amendment it won’t protect…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech On Gun Control

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Infact a shooting happened on April 2007 at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, “in which gunman Seung-Hui Cho killed thirty-two people. Just about any adult can go and buy a gun, without showing identification or passing a background check. As a result, Seung-Hui Cho, with a record of mental health problems, was able to open fire on classrooms at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in April 2007, killing and wounding many students and teachers.” Gunman Seung-Hui Cho bought his gun at a gunshow, with no background checks. If firearms were not available to the american public these 32 innocent victims wouldn't have died. The man who was lucky to have survived the shooting investigated the subject himself. He found out that at gun shows you can buy a gun in five minutes, and at a bit of a higher price you can skip the background checks. Every situation where there are armed civilians there are more chances of people…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays