Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Fracking

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
674 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Fracking
The topic in question is hydraulic fracturing, more commonly known as fracking. Said practice is vital to study because at the moment there are many questions about its potential negative effect on our environment, yet oil companies are pushing for its complete legality. The four articles used include Fracking practices in offshore California waters by oil companies probed by regulators (Jason Dearen and Alicia Chang, Los Angeles Daily News), Fracking war: Sierra Club says bill not good enough (Marc Lifsher, Los Angeles Times), As Obama Visits Upstate New York, the Fracking Debate Takes Center Stage (Bryan Walsh, Time Magazine), and Fracking is Eating Away at Our National Parks (Mary Catherine O’Connor, Outside Magazine). The authors all …show more content…
Tupper Hull, spokesman for the Western States Petroleum Association, was also quoted. The two had very different opinions on fracking’s overall safety. The article from the Los Angeles Times uses information provided by Kathryn Phillips, the California director for the Sierra Club, along with information from liberal activist groups Credo and MoveOn, and finally from Paul Deiro, lobbiest from the Western States Petroleum Association. Obviously, Deiro’s opinion on fracking’s safety was much more favorable for the oil companies than from any of the other sources, who all oppose the practice. The Time Magazine article quoted Walter Hang, the head of an organization called Toxic Targeting, along with President Obama, and New York State Governor Andrew Cumo. Finally, the Outside Magazine article quoted James Nations, leader of the NPCA 's Center for Park Research, a U.S. Geological Survey, and Clay Jenkinson, a Theodore Roosevelt scholar who appears in a short film that goes along with the …show more content…
This comes as no surprise because the issues brought up in all three could have negative impacts on the lives of the authors of the articles. In my opinion, fracking should be totally illegal until more conclusive studies have been performed, and prove said practice does not have a detrimental effect on our environment, specifically groundwater and ocean water. To improve the articles there should be more diagrams and graphs to better display the information in a more straightforward manor. The only way for the public to have a better understanding of these issues is if popular television media focuses on important environmental debates such as fracking, instead of stories that will have little to no lasting impact. Further, the environmental groups need to advertise as much as they can, whether it be on television or the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: There is major debate both for and against using the fracking method to extract natural gas from the ground, but I propose that the federal government establish, monitor, and regulate environmental and health risks, and then create a minimum standard which the states are required to follow. Background: In the 1940’s the Halliburton Corporation developed a process to revitalize well production and prolong the life of wells nearing the end of their production cycle. The fracturing process, called “fracking”, pumps a mixture of water and sand, along with some chemical additives, at high pressures to create additional fractures in the sedimentary rock.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mooney, C 2011, ‘The truth about Fracking’, Scientific American, vol. 305, no. 5, pp. 80-85.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is nothing fictitious about the arguments in fracking. Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is a way of obtaining oil and gas through the practice of cracking open rocks at high pressures using water, sand, and various chemicals (Jackson, 2016, para. 1). All over America, numerous interest groups participate in a continuous debate on the ethics of this procedure. Two prominent documentaries that circulate the media are FrackNation by Phelim McAleer and Gasland by Josh Fox. Each documentary presents its view of pro-fracking and anti-fracking, respectively through a series of various logical fallacies. FrackNation efficiently refutes the claims of Gasland through the effective use of logical fallacies.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gasland Josh Fox Analysis

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once he finds out that fracking (hydraulic fracturing) has been taking place in 35 states he begins his trip. Almost all the people he interviews feel that fracking is contaminating drinking water sources. The people interviewed also had to say that the public health and safety is least of the concern for these natural gas companies. The film shows that it has affected people through out United States. Many of those who lived close to extraction sites had shown symptoms of diseases or poisonings for example loss of hair, headaches and muscle aches. There were some severe cases like cancer, neuralgia and permanent brain damage. The loopholes created by politicians like Dick Cheney to exempt fracking from certain emission standards including Safe Drinking Water act and the corporate greed has been blamed for all the problems that is considered to be associated with…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now this all sounds very nice, but fracking is one of the most debated topics recently out of following reasons: It takes an immense amounts of water, it poses the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaslands Part II

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie Gaslands: Part II highlights the many problems with fracking for natural gas in the United States. It starts by showing the support of politicians and President Barack Obama himself. Gradually, the movie starts to show the wrongs that the oil companies are committing while fracking. The natural gas is so profitable that the injustice seems like a minor setback in the quest for the end results. Throughout the movie, it shows how families are affected, and just how spread out these families are throughout the country, which goes to show the extent to which the country is affected.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Pros And Cons

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hydraulic fracturing, also termed hydrofracturing, hydrofracking, or simply fracking, is hotly debated for its economic and environmental impacts. Fracking is the process by which rock is fractured by a pressurized fluid containing water. chemicals and sand to access natural gas, petroleum and brine from great depths of the Earth’s surface. Fracking produces the economic benefit of more accessible hydrocarbons, not to mention the 2.5 million fracking related jobs that were recorded in 2012 worldwide, one million of which were in the United States alone (FracFocus: ECHO-EPA Violations). However, many fear the environmental effects. Risks include ground and surface water contamination, air and noise pollution, and an increase in seismic activity. Hazards to public health and the environment are yet to be discovered, because the first commercial application did not begin until the late 1940’s; however, hydraulic fractures have been recorded naturally throughout time (The Truth about…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern environmental justice movement began in the mid- 20th century, when the country realized that the environment needed help. This movement throughout the last several decades has evolved from protecting woodland areas from deforestation to protection against the gas industry. Hydraulic fracturing is the process by which natural gas is extracted from the earth’s shales. The process begins with drilling through several layers of the earth, like the freshwater aquifer. Next, water with “fracking fluid” is injected into the drilled area to crack the shale. This water comes back up to the surface and is put into a pit to evaporate. The natural gas flows up, and is then stored. The process is simple enough, but so are the consequences. Hydraulic fracturing has detrimental environmental consequences and should be banned.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russell Gold’s book, The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World, is a great book for anyone who wants to know exactly what fracking is and the effects that come with it. Gold also reports in his book about the pros and cons of fracking and the impact it has had on our world.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some agencies and individuals are calling for an immediate halt to the process claiming that we are leaking tons of carcinogens, radionuclides, heavy metals/salts, and harmful hydrocarbons into our drinking water. The energy industry, and many proponents of the obvious economic advantages of fracking say these claims are misleading and overstated. They claim there is a lack of evidence to support these ideals, and much of the research being touted as proof of environmental impact is outdated, and does not reflect the current state of the art methods being implemented to mitigate toxic…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial new method of extracting natural gas from the earth has become a danger for Americans. This method is called Hydraulic Fracturing, or Fracking. This drilling has made it possible to retrieve methane gas trapped in the shale rock that lays thousands of feet below the ground. For some, fracking can be seen as a good thing for our country. Fracking is boosting the nation’s economy, creating jobs and energy export opportunities, and strengthening the energy independence of the United States. Although it may help in some aspects, it comes at a very high cost to the American people. Fracking is extremely harmful to the water supply, the environment, and the population.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree Mr. Murdoch's opening statement against political correctness and his assertion that America is an influential force for the "vindication of human values". However, I am disagree with his viewpoint on fracking. Although I can see the merit in his view that fracking will allow a great many people to benefit economically from it, he never mentions the environmental implications of it. I think that the importance of the preservation of the environment while we still can merits restrictions on the use of fracking. It's an environmentally unsound technique that is wasteful and unsustainable. Additionally, it also presents safety and health hazards to those who live near fracturing sites. I agree that we should strive to minimize both intellectual…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fracking Problem

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page

    The problem we have is fracking. Fracking is the process of putting high pressure liquid into rocks, boreholes, etc. to force gas to release from the rock. Fracking is associated to air and water pollution, it also increases the potential for oil spills that can harm the soil and vegetation around the rock. Fracking can also cause earthquakes. The scale of the problem is very big as fracking can have negative effects on both the environment and the public health. The problem fracking causes to biodiversity is that the fluid contaminates streams and rivers that fish live in causing fish to die. Birds are also poisoned by chemicals in wastewater ponds.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counter arguments against hydraulic fracturing include the lack of government regulations, and environmental issues. While most energy companies are conscientious and put forth every effort to make fracking safe, without oversight, some companies are reeking havoc on communities, individuals, and nature. John Rumpler, Senior Attorney for Environment America, says those taking advantage of unrestricted production are responsible for complaints of coercion, contaminated drinking water, flammable well water, physical illnesses of those living close to sites, noise pollution, death of domestic animals and wildlife, and destruction of pristine landscapes (Bambrick). Consequently, the 2005 Energy Policy Act made fracking exempt from the Clean Water…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand how actors create a controversy over a technology it is best understood from Ulrich Beck’s theory of risk society. Beck explains how society moves from an industrial society to a risk society through two phases. Phase one: where self-harm is systematically produced but is not a public issue or in any way the center of political conflict, and phase two: hazards from the industrial society now dominate the political and public debates (Beck, 1999, pp. 72). These phases are distinguished due to an increase in knowledge distribution, and the understanding that calculable risks in an industrial society became incalculable and unpredictable now in a risk society. Understanding the different levels of risk interpretation by different actors builds support on why they may or may not support a technology. In the case of hydraulic fracturing, proponents argue fracking outcomes result in simplistic risks, which means they are manageable and can be easily calculated. In responding to…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics