Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
718 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
Bombings are brutal, deadly, and very sad. It's very destructive and a waste of precious life. They could destroy families, towns, lives. Bombings now days can be from things like terrorist attacks, wars, or battles. A battle is brutal with lots of death and destruction but at times it’s necessary to accomplish the goal of ending a war. The USA will do whatever they can to protect their people like inventing the atomic bomb which they used to end World War 2. To drop the atomic bombs to stop the war they used the planes “Enola Gay” and “Bockscar”.(atomcentral) The first bomb was “Little Boy” was carried by Enola Gay while “Fat Man” was carried by Bockscar.(atomcentral) Little Boy was the first of the bombs and was dropped on Hiroshima then Fat Man on Nagasaki.(atomcentral) The pilots of the planes were Paul Tibbets and Charles W. Sweeney.(atomcheritage) Charles W. Sweeney had a co-pilot, Charles Donald Albury.(atomcheritage) Little Boy is a uranium 235 comb and Fatman is a plutonium 239 bomb. (atomcheritage) About 80,000 people died by little boy in Hiroshima. For Fat man around 60,000 deaths due to it falling in a canyon. (atomcheritage) …show more content…
In the first bombing that hit Hiroshima it destroyed 70,000 to 76,000 buildings.(atomcheritage) Nagasaki had ⅓ of its building destroyed, burned, or damaged.(atomcheritage) Before the bombing of Nagasaki the city had around 190,000 people living there.(History) Then around 30 years later the city grew to around 500,000 people living there.(History) The population still stays around this amount to this day.(History) Although the population may be decreasing.(History) For Hiroshima the population was around 140,000 people before the bombing.(History) Unlike Nagasaki the population keeps growing and is now around 1 million

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In August of 1939, President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to construct an atomic bomb. He was also warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. Roosevelt, in response to this set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which consisted of both military and civilian representatives. In order to reach their own advancements in the nuclear field faster than Germany they were to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. At Columbia University a limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions were performed by Enrico Fermi and Leo…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The bomb caused great destruction to thousands of innocent lives. The bomb created a whole other problem, that could’ve been substituted with another weapon, that not as deadly. Bombs came with pros and cons, the bombs meant for people and those who have nothing to do with any incident. Overall the bombs were pure cruel.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war was nearing an end as many countries were losing soldiers as well as supplies left and right. However, the fighting would not have ceased if it were not for the bombing that brought a sense of peace in America. No country wanted the pathetic duty to surrender to their enemies. The bomb allowed the war to be stopped sooner, which saved many lives not only in America but other countries as well. The war lasted…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bombs completely destroyed most of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. When the bombs hit, heat force and nuclear blast tore up everything. Thousands of people who did not die the day of the bombings later died within weeks because of the after effects. The damage was so big that survivors thought it was the end of the world. The atomic explosion over Nagasaki affected about 42.9 square miles. The fire damage in both cities was massive, but was worse in Hiroshima than in Nagasaki. Fire fighting and rescue units were deprived of men and equipment so there were no rescue parties for about 30…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were ninety thousand buildings in Hiroshima before the bomb was dropped only twenty eight thousand remained after the explosion. The devastation was immense and widespread. The bodies from the bombing of Hiroshima were laying out covering the road, charcoal black, and flesh hanging off burnt to no recognition. The witnesses of the bombing remembers the masses of people crawling and dragging their bodies trying to get to the water to stop the pain. They did not know that this bombing was only a…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would you do if you were a soldier, and you knew that if your country didn’t drop the atomic bomb, then you would die? This is what many soldiers were thinking about on August 6th, 1945 when the American government decided to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. By doing this they saved millions of American lives. When they did this Japan surrendered and it won us the war. Also, it demonstrated the power of America. America did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the aftermath over 60 cities were bombed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombs caused so much damage to the country that their society was will always be scarred by it. It was important for the U.S. to defend themselves but many of the people who died had no part in the war. The method the U.S. chose to use was morally wrong. In Hiroshima, one hundred forty thousand people died and in Nagasaki eighty thousand people died. Most of the people died after the bomb because of the radiation. The radiation would kill peoples white blood cells and if you have dead blood cells they can not fight off infection and then you will die. The radiation would also leave marks on your skin that would most likely never come off. The Japanese had a lot of damage done by the the atomic bombs and they did not deserve it. William Leahy thought the exact same thing “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons”…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thesis states the petition made on July 4, 1945, to the president of the United States drafted by author Leo Szilard and cosigned by scientist of the atomic bomb committee to consider the consequences of using the atomic bomb. The organization and structure of the writing brings a strong message about the devastation an atomic bomb would do to any city in the hands of our Army, but ultimately by our Commander and Chief who has the power to use it (Szilard).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1941, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. This prompted the United States to enter World War II. Four years later and still at war, the President Franklin Roosevelt received a letter from Albert Einstein explaining efforts in Nazi Germany to build an atomic bomb. The United States Government soon after began a very secretive project known as “The Manhattan Project”. They developed a new weapon, which was called the nuclear bomb. The United States made two of these weapons, “Little Boy” which consisted of uranium-235, weighed about 9,700lbs and, two billion dollars of research was the smallest of the two. “Fat Boy” was made out of plutonium-238 and weighed around 10,800lbs and being ten times more efficient than “Little Boy”. President Truman warned Japan with the consequences if they didn’t surrender with the Potsdam Declaration. It was signed by President Truman, and by Prime Minister Attlee of the United Kingdom and with the concurrence of Chiang Kai-Shek, President of the National Government of China. Japan refused to surrender. In order to avoid an inevitable bombing campaign and land invasion of Japan that would have killed many US soldiers and citizens; President Truman issued the order to drop the bomb “ Little Boy” to save as many US lives as he could. At 9:15am August 6th 1945, something happened that would affect our world and all of human kind. Enola Gay dropped a bomb over Hiroshima, Japan. Even after having a second chance they still refused to surrender.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays